Organizations: Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Defense University
Abstract
Multi-modal test-time adaptation (TTA) enhances the resilience of benchmark multi-modal models against distribution shifts by leveraging the unlabeled target data during inference. Despite the documented success, the advancement of multi-modal TTA methodologies has been impeded by a persistent limitation, i.e., the lack of explicit modeling of category-conditional distributions, which is crucial for yielding accurate predictions and reliable decision boundaries. Canonical Gaussian discriminant analysis (GDA) provides a vanilla modeling of category-conditional distributions and achieves moderate advancement in uni-modal contexts. However, in multi-modal TTA scenario, the inherent modality distribution asymmetry undermines the effectiveness of modeling the category-conditional distribution via the canonical GDA. To this end, we introduce a tailored probabilistic Gaussian model for multi-modal TTA to explicitly model the category-conditional distributions, and further propose an adaptive contrastive asymmetry rectification technique to counteract the adverse effects arising from modality asymmetry, thereby deriving calibrated predictions and reliable decision boundaries. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance under a wide range of distribution shifts. The code is available at https://github.com/XuJinglinn/AdaPGC.
Conventional test-time adaptation (TTA) approaches typically adapt the model using only a small fraction of test samples, often those with low-entropy predictions, thereby failing to fully leverage the available information in the test distribution. This paper introduces DualTTA, a novel framework that improves performance under distribution shifts by utilizing a larger and more diverse set of test samples. DualTTA identifies two distinct groups: one where the model's predictions are likely consistent with the underlying semantics, and another where predictions are likely incorrect. For the first group, it minimizes prediction entropy to reinforce reliable decisions; for the second, it maximizes entropy to suppress overconfident errors and unlearn spurious behavior. These groups are adaptively selected using a new reliability criterion that measures prediction stability under both semantic-preserving and semantic-altering transformations, addressing the limitations of purely entropy-based selection. We further provide theoretical analysis and empirical justification showing that our approach enables a tighter separation between reliable and unreliable samples, in the context of their suitability for adaptation, leading to provably more effective model updates.
Nam Nguyen Phuong, Duc Nguyen The Minh, Phi Le Nguyen +2
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) seeks to improve model robustness under distribution shifts by adapting parameters using unlabeled target data. However, in the absence of supervision, entropy-based adaptation is fundamentally underconstrained: multiple distinct parameter updates can achieve similarly low entropy while inducing drastically different decision boundaries. This phenomenon, known as underspecification, renders standard TTA brittle and prone to collapse into spurious modes. In this work, we reinterpret TTA through a posterior-inspired lens induced by entropy minimization, where low-entropy solutions define a pseudo-likelihood over parameters. Instead of committing to a single point estimate, we introduce a particle-based diversification framework that explores multiple plausible adaptation trajectories simultaneously. Our method can be viewed as a structured exploration of multiple plausible adaptation solutions, implemented through multi-level diversification at the output, parameter, optimizer, and input levels. Crucially, the framework acts as a plug-and-play wrapper compatible with existing TTA methods. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in stability and robustness, achieving improvements of 3-4% under mixed shifts, 2-3% with batch size one, and 1-2.5% under label shifts, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Our results suggest that treating TTA as a multi-hypothesis inference problem, rather than a single-point optimization task, is key to mitigating underspecification and enabling reliable real-world deployment.
Vision-language models transfer well in zero-shot settings, but at deployment the visual and textual branches often shift asymmetrically. Under this condition, entropy-based test-time adaptation can sharpen the fused posterior while increasing error, because an unreliable modality may still dominate fusion. We study this failure mode through a majorization view of multimodal posteriors and cast adaptation as a constrained de-mixing problem on the fused prediction. Based on this view, we propose MG-MTTA, which keeps the backbone frozen and updates only a lightweight gate or adapter. The objective combines fused-posterior entropy minimization with a reliability-aware gate prior built from anchor-based modality consistency and cross-modal conflict. Our analysis gives conditions under which entropy reduction preserves the correct ranking and a threshold that characterizes modality-dominance failure. On the ImageNet-based benchmark, MG-MTTA improves top-1 accuracy from 57.97 to 66.51 under semantics-preserving textual shift and from 21.68 to 26.27 under joint visual-textual shift, while remaining competitive in the visual-only benchmark. These results show that multimodal test-time adaptation should control modality reliability, not just prediction entropy.