Watts-per-Intelligence Part II: Algorithmic Catalysis

Thermodynamic computers are stochastic physical devices designed to perform calculations at the thermal energy scale. Their operation is constrained by the equations of stochastic thermodynamics, among which are a set of bounds, known as speed limits, that relate a thermodynamic computer's run time to its computational progress and the heat it dissipates. Using the Wasserstein speed limit we assess the thermodynamic efficiency of a simulation model of a thermodynamic computer trained to perform a standard machine-learning classification task. On this task the thermodynamic computer is as capable as a simple multilayer perceptron. We show that different inference protocols allow the computer to operate within 40% of the thermodynamic limit of efficiency without loss of accuracy, or to perform inference increasingly rapidly at fixed accuracy and thermodynamic efficiency. These results indicate that a thermodynamic computer designed for a particular task retains considerable freedom in its thermodynamic operation.

The theory of computation was built to answer Turing's question: what is effectively calculable by an unbounded, immortal, disembodied agent following rules? Intelligence answers a different question (nature's): what can a \emph{finite}, mortal, energy-limited agent do quickly enough to survive in a non-stationary world? We argue that a complete answer requires two operators: \emph{computation} and \emph{memorizaion}. Computation, $\dpar$, transforms structure toward closure; memorization, $\kap$, condenses a validated closed cycle into a reusable token. Turing formalized $\dpar$ and abstracted $\kap$ away, because his agent had infinite time and never needed to amortize. The new insight of our position paper is that the coupling of the two is not optional but \emph{forced}, and forced by a precise mathematical fact: \textbf{neither operator alone can be complete}. We prove that symbolic computation confined to a discrete sector suffers Gödel's diagonalization incompleteness, that geometric descent confined to a continuous sector suffers a Morse forced-saddle incompleteness, and that these two are not analogies but the parity-conjugate faces of a single obstruction on a coherent complex with $\dpar^2=0$ - the even face realized by diagonalization, the odd by the topologically forced saddle, and no resolution confined to one parity able to come full circle. Intelligence must therefore couple both modes. We then locate the price of the coupling: its hinge operation, context-identification (the recognize-versus-discover decision), is exactly where the two incompletenesses coincide, hence undecidable and carrying an irreducible error floor. Finally we argue that the coupling is a universal law, realized, in the emergent sense of Anderson's ``more is different,'' at every scale from genes to thoughts to cultures, and give its falsifiable core and honest scope.

Can intelligence be measured? We propose that intelligence can be defined as the lawful amplification of rare but valid futures: a system increases the probability of outcomes that would be unlikely under passive dynamics but remain admissible under the constraints of the domain. We start with the premise that an intelligent system must model the world and its own place within it. Because the system is part of the world it models, this leads naturally to recursive self-simulation: the system represents futures in which its own actions are part of the trajectory. Our central results give a necessity statement and a conditional near-sufficiency statement connecting this architecture to a precise thermodynamic measure of lawful amplification of rare-valid futures: high rare-valid lift is impossible unless the internal simulation identifies rare-valid futures with high fidelity; conversely, when rare-valid fidelity is high and the simulation contains an effective policy, the achievable lift approaches the actuation-limited optimum. Thus recursive self-simulation is not merely a plausible feature of intelligence but, under the stated assumptions, is necessary and nearly sufficient for high thermodynamic intelligence. The resulting framework makes intelligence measurable on a universal scale, from passive matter and feedback controllers, large language models, and humans as text generators to Maxwell-demon-like information engines.