Pedestrians play chicken with an autonomous vehicle

As automated vehicles (AVs) increasingly share roadways with human-driven vehicles (HDVs), understanding how pedestrians respond to different vehicle types in safety-critical interactions is essential for the safe deployment of automated driving technologies. This study extracts safety-critical pedestrian-vehicle interactions from the Argoverse 2 dataset to capture real-world crash avoidance behaviors in encounters involving AVs and HDVs. To model vehicle-type-specific pedestrian crash avoidance behavior, we develop a Smooth-Mamba Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient framework, termed SMamba-DDPG, which integrates smooth action constraints with efficient temporal representation learning. To quantify pedestrian behavioral differences, the framework trains separate crash avoidance policies for pedestrian interactions with AVs and HDVs. Results show that SMamba-DDPG outperforms baseline reinforcement learning and supervised learning models in reproducing pedestrian crash avoidance behaviors. Reconstructed trajectories demonstrate strong behavioral realism, accurately reproducing crash avoidance kinematics in both AV and HDV scenarios. Reaction time analysis shows that the model captures human-like response delays and reveals that pedestrians respond more quickly to AVs than to HDVs. Counterfactual analysis further indicates that pedestrians adopt lower crossing speeds when interacting with AVs. Large-scale safety analysis of model-generated data revealed that pedestrian-AV interactions consistently yielded lower conflict rates and higher pedestrian yielding rates compared to pedestrian-HDV interactions. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating vehicle-type-specific pedestrian behavioral models for safer automated driving system design and more realistic traffic simulations in mixed-traffic environments.

Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) must make reliable decisions in dense urban environments where pedestrian behavior is variable, sometimes abnormal, and often unseen during training. Reinforcement learning (RL)-based AV control systems perform well in structured traffic but struggle to generalize to unpredictable pedestrian interactions and out-of-distribution scenarios. Their reliance on handcrafted rewards and opaque decisions further limits their suitability for safety-critical, pedestrian-rich environments. To address these limitations, we introduce a Large Language Model (LLM)-based decision-making framework for pedestrian-aware behavioral planning. The system converts structured scene observations into natural-language reasoning prompts, enabling the LLM to infer pedestrian intent, anticipate risk, and generate cautious tactical driving decisions. These decisions are executed by a motion planner that ensures smooth, kinematically feasible control. We evaluate the framework in SUMO across multiple pedestrian-interaction scenarios, including unexpected jaywalking, turn-back crossing, hesitation, and bidirectional crossing. In zero-shot evaluation, the LLM-based agent achieves a 68% collision-free success rate, substantially outperforming deep RL baselines (17.7%). With few-shot episodic memory in a single-pedestrian scenario, performance increases to 96.0%, exceeding a custom DQN controller (82.0%). Cross-behavior evaluation further shows that memory derived from turn-back interactions transfers to unseen hesitation and bidirectional crossing scenarios, achieving 82.0% and 90.0% success, respectively. The system consistently initiates earlier responses, maintains wider safety buffers, and produces interpretable, human-aligned decisions.

Understanding human responses to autonomous vehicle (AV) behaviors is essential for socially aware interaction, which is crucial for socially compatible navigation in shared traffic environments. We characterize human driving responses in interactions with AVs as feedback laws over the coupled state space of the human driven vehicle and the AV. We model the human driver's actions using a response map, a concept based in game theory, and employ a linear representation to capture driver behaviors as a function of AV behaviors, based on empirical data from a driving simulator study. Our results show that 1) human driver acceleration behavior can be captured using response maps, and 2) human driver responses differ significantly with respect to AV behaviors of yielding, non-yielding, and responsive to the human driver.