Random Cloud: Finding Minimal Neural Architectures Without Training

Training-free neural architecture search promises efficient discovery of high-performance networks without costly training. However, existing zero-cost proxies rely on fragmented heuristics that fail to capture the fundamental question: what makes an architecture trainable? This paper introduces Intrinsic Trainability (InTrain), a unified theoretical proxy that formalizes trainability as an architectural invariant emerging from two synergistic components: geometric capacity and optimization resilience. We operationalize intrinsic trainability through analysis of neural information processing. Geometric capacity is quantified via the participation ratio of activation covariance eigenspectrum, capturing the effective dimensionality of representation manifolds. Optimization resilience is measured through cumulative gradient health, assessing the robustness of backpropagation across network depth. InTrain synthesizes these dimensions through a scale-invariant multiplicative coupling, which we hypothesize is essential for capturing their synergistic, non-additive relationship. Extensive experiments on standard NAS benchmarks and search spaces demonstrate that InTrain achieves ranking correlations on par with state-of-the-art ensemble-based proxies and outperforms other single-metric methods.

We study a Marchenko--Pastur (MP) random-matrix approach to pruning deep neural networks with very small post-pruning fine-tuning budgets. The main practical contribution is accuracy retention under short calibration and fine-tuning schedules, rather than a long post-pruning reoptimization pipeline. The theory gives deterministic data-path certificates: if the removed component $R$ has small propagated logit effect $L_s \| R ψ_1(s) \|_\infty$, pruning decreases an elastic-net objective and preserves samples whose dense margin exceeds twice the perturbation. The zero-budget case gives perfect pruning; a prune--restore extension models weight restoration inside a fixed sparse-execution pattern; and an additive $L_2$-regularized model shows admissible random-like components vanish at the training limit, with persistent spikes stabilizing as the MP bulk collapses. Under iid-Gaussian sufficient conditions, the fitted MP edge $σ_+$ gives a high-probability layerwise budget signal. On ImageNet-1k, after only three distillation epochs, ViT-B/16 $2{:}4{+}$ToMe reaches $83.41\%$ top-1 ($-1.70$ pp from dense) at $59.81\%$ sparse-execution MAC reduction, with $1.388\times$ best-observed A40 native-$2{:}4$ backend speedup for the same checkpoint and ToMe graph; a separate no-ToMe A100 endpoint gives $2.705\times$. At structured sparsity, ViT-B/16 $6{:}12$ reaches $83.74\%$, ViT-L/16 $8{:}16$ dense+permutation reaches $85.33\%$ ($-0.51$ pp), and ConvNeXtV2-Base $12{:}16$ reaches $86.35\%$ ($-0.37$ pp). For CNNs, ResNet50 $8{:}16$ dense+permutation reaches $75.87\%$ ($-0.26$ pp), and ResNet152d CAST-conv+permutation reaches $81.33\%$ ($-1.53$ pp) at ${\sim}50\%$ MAC accounting with a $1.62\times$ A40 im2col$+2{:}4$ sparse-GEMM audit.

Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles. This work evaluates progressive magnitude-based pruning as a single-cycle alternative. The method gradually increases sparsity during training using a linear schedule and updates pruning masks based on active weight magnitudes. We conduct systematic experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST across ResNet, VGG-style, and LeNet architectures, comparing the proposed method with representative iterative and initialization-based pruning baselines, including LTH, SNIP, and GraSP. On CIFAR-10, the method achieves 95.12% accuracy on ResNet-18 at 72.9% sparsity, compared with 90.5% reported for LTH. At extreme sparsity, it achieves 93.13% accuracy on a VGG-like architecture at 97% sparsity, compared with approximately 92.0% for SNIP, and 93.44% accuracy on VGG-19 at 97.97% sparsity, compared with 92.19% for GraSP at 98% sparsity. A sparsity-accuracy analysis on ResNet-18 further shows that accuracy remains within 0.1 percentage points of the dense baseline across 70--85% sparsity. These results indicate that progressive magnitude-based pruning provides an effective single-cycle approach for neural network sparsification under the evaluated settings.