Cloud Is Closer Than It Appears: Revisiting the Tradeoffs of Distributed Real-Time Inference

Cloud robotics enables robots to offload high-dimensional motion planning and reasoning to remote servers. However, for continuous manipulation tasks requiring high-frequency control, network latency and jitter can severely destabilize the system, causing command starvation and unsafe physical execution. To address this, we propose Speculative Policy Orchestration (SPO), a latency-resilient cloud-edge framework. SPO utilizes a cloud-hosted world model to pre-compute and stream future kinematic waypoints to a local edge buffer, decoupling execution frequency from network round-trip time. To mitigate unsafe execution caused by predictive drift, the edge node employs an $ε$-tube verifier that strictly bounds kinematic execution errors. The framework is coupled with an Adaptive Horizon Scaling mechanism that dynamically expands or shrinks the speculative pre-fetch depth based on real-time tracking error. We evaluate SPO on continuous RLBench manipulation tasks under emulated network delays. Results show that even when deployed with learned models of modest accuracy, SPO reduces network-induced idle time by over 60% compared to blocking remote inference. Furthermore, SPO discards approximately 60% fewer cloud predictions than static caching baselines. Ultimately, SPO enables fluid, real-time cloud-robotic control while maintaining bounded physical safety.

Industrial systems increasingly depend on Machine Learning (ML), and operate on heterogeneous nodes that must satisfy tight latency, energy, and memory constraints. Dynamic ML models, which reconfigure their computational footprint at runtime, promise high energy efficiency and lower average latency for modest accuracy tradeoffs; however, their deployment is complex due to the additional hyperparameters they rely on. These hyperparameters, controlling the accuracy versus average latency tradeoff, are often tuned on a calibration dataset that must match the test time distribution, an assumption that rarely holds in real-world scenarios, leading to suboptimal operational conditions, possibly below static models. We propose a two-tier adaptive architecture that co-optimizes model and system decisions. At the global level, a scheduler configures and deploys, for each edge node, a cascade of classifiers composed of lightweight specialized models and a generalist fallback, satisfying latency and memory constraints. At the node level, a local controller tracks data drifts and hardware resources, enabling or disabling specialized predictors (SP) to preserve high energy efficiency and avoid latency-constraint violations under varying conditions. This design allows longer operating times without forcing a global redeployment step, and enables efficient execution in case of an unreachable remote global controller. We evaluate the approach on two datasets under controlled distribution mismatch scenarios, showing average per-inference reductions of latency up to 2.45x and energy up to 2.86x, with less than 4% accuracy drop compared to static baselines. Our contributions are:(1) a budgeted SP-cascade formulation that preserves worst-case latency constraints;(2) a hierarchical controller that maintains efficiency under data and resource changes; and (3) an experimental evaluation on embedded hardware.

Inference systems increasingly combine a fast path that returns predictions within the application's latency deadline together with a higher-accuracy slow path that runs higher-compute methods on stronger, remote hardware, so its results can be returned on time and combined with the fast path predictions. Across several application domains, we abstract this inference architecture as a fast path, a slow path, and a coordination layer with two functions: a router that invokes the slow path and a merger that decides whether to incorporate its returned predictions. In this work, we show that this new coordination layer exposes a new attack surface: shaped workload attacks, e.g., Yo-Yo bursts, can exploit contention at shared resources along the slow path to push benign users' slow-path predictions past their latency deadlines. The merger then discards those predictions, while the fast path continues to return timely outputs. We refer to the resulting loss of slow-path accuracy benefits as accuracy collapse. We demonstrate accuracy collapse in a two-tier edge-cloud multi-object tracking pipeline in autonomous driving. In simulation, approximately 4,000 burst-shaped requests increase benign p99 latency from 92ms to 2s, nearly eliminating the benefit of the slow path's cloud inference, reducing object tracking quality by 7.0 HOTA points on average. We further find that accuracy degradation can significantly vary (2.0-18.7 HOTA points), depending on the video intervals that are targeted in the attack, and that certain rare classes (e.g., stop signs) lose nearly half of their pre-attack prediction accuracy. These results show that workload attacks can degrade prediction quality without needing either access to model weights or victim data, and motivate research on attacks and defenses for routing, merging, scheduling, and resource isolation in these emerging inference pipeline architectures.