The Perceptual Bandwidth Bottleneck in Vision-Language Models: Active Visual Reasoning via Sequential Experimental Design

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) deployed as situated agents in high-resolution visual environments require active perception -- the ability to dynamically decide where to look through operations like zooming, cropping, and panning. However, current training paradigms produce models that mimic the surface form of such operations without functionally depending on their outputs, a phenomenon we term lazy perception. We trace this to a fundamental learning asymmetry: when coarse global views combined with language priors suffice for moderate accuracy, the model has no incentive to learn harder multi-step visual search. If a model can succeed without actively looking, it will never learn to look. This motivates Starve to Perceive, a training paradigm that constrains visual bandwidth -- restricting each observation to a tight token budget so that no single view suffices for task completion, making active perception the only viable strategy. Despite requiring no auxiliary losses, reward shaping, or architectural changes -- serving as a minimal, plug-in modification to standard post-training pipelines -- models trained under perceptual starvation achieve substantial gains of 5% average relative improvement across diverse benchmarks.

Vision-language models benefit from high-resolution images, but the increase in visual-token count incurs high compute overhead. Humans resolve this tension via foveation: a coarse view guides "where to look", while selectively acquired high-acuity evidence refines "what to think". We introduce Foveated Reasoner, an autoregressive vision-language framework that unifies foveation and reasoning within a single decoding trajectory. Starting from a low-resolution view, the model triggers foveation only when needed, retrieves high-resolution evidence from selected regions, and injects it back into the same decoding trajectory. We train the method with a two-stage pipeline: coldstart supervision to bootstrap foveation behavior, followed by reinforcement learning to jointly improve evidence acquisition and task accuracy while discouraging trivial "see-everything" solutions. Experiments show that the method learns effective foveation policies and achieves stronger accuracy under tight visual-token budgets across multiple vision-language benchmarks.

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) emphasize long chain-of-thought reasoning; yet, we find that their performance on visual tasks is primarily limited by a lack of visual perception as opposed to reasoning itself. In this work, we systematically study the interplay between perception and reasoning in VLM post-training by decomposing their capabilities into three separate training stages: visual perception, visual reasoning, and textual reasoning, incorporating specialized training data. We demonstrate that visual perception (a) requires targeted optimization with specialized data; (b) serves as a fundamental scaffold that should be solidified through staged training before refining visual reasoning; and (c) is more effectively learned via RL than caption-based SFT. Our experiments across multiple VLMs demonstrate that staged training consistently improves both visual perception and reasoning performance over merged training. Notably, models trained with our approach achieve 1.5% higher reasoning accuracy with 20.8% shorter reasoning traces, suggesting that superior perception reduces the need for excessive reasoning. Furthermore, we show that this capability-based staging represents a new curriculum dimension orthogonal to traditional difficulty-based curricula, and combining both yields further additive gains. Our staged-training models achieve superior performance among open-weight VLMs, establishing advanced results on several visual math and perception (e.g., +5.2% on WeMath and +3.7% on RealWorldQA) tasks compared with the base counterpart.