Autonomous spacecraft docking requires control policies that simultaneously ensure collision avoidance and target reachability under coupled, high-dimensional translational-rotational dynamics. Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability provides formal reach-avoid guarantees, but classical solvers are limited to low-dimensional systems. Learning-based approaches have begun to scale HJ analysis, yet they struggle in reach-avoid settings, especially where goal and failure sets are tightly coupled, as in docking. We propose a learning-based Backward Reach-Avoid Tube (BRAT) framework that addresses this challenge by tightly integrating HJ structure with MPC-based supervision. In the offline phase, we train a neural approximation of the HJ value function using PDE-based losses augmented with curriculum-driven MPC supervision, which provides informative value targets and stabilizes training in regions where purely PDE-based methods fail. In the online phase, the learned value function is deployed through two real-time controllers: (i) a value gradient-driven controller, and (ii) a value-function-augmented terminal MPC that explicitly enforces reachability at the horizon. We evaluate the proposed method on a 6D planar docking problem against grid-based ground truth and then scale to the full 13D system. Across both settings, our approach outperforms existing methods in success rate and computational efficiency.
This article presents a Hamilton--Jacobi (HJ) reachability framework for a two--satellite collision avoidance problem operating in the same circular orbit, where relative motion is modeled in the radial--tangential--normal (RTN) frame using planar Hill--Clohessy--Wiltshire (HCW) dynamics. We define the target state space as unsafe relative configurations in the orbit plane corresponding to minimum separation requirements consistent with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) orbital standards. The interaction between spacecraft is formulated as a zero--sum differential game, where Player 1 is the controlled satellite and Player 2 is modeled as a bounded adversarial disturbance with unknown intent. We present the HJ formulation and compute backward reachable sets that characterize relative states from which collision cannot be avoided under worst-case disturbances, while states outside this set admit provably collision-free trajectories. These reachable sets are integrated with supervisory hybrid control logic to determine when evasive maneuvers must be initiated, enabling mathematically grounded safety guarantees for scalability.
Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability provides a mathematically rigorous framework for safe control of dynamical systems, but its practical application is bottlenecked by the computational complexity of solving Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs variational inequality PDEs in high dimensions. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to classical mesh-based solvers, yet their performance is highly sensitive to the choice of collocation sampling. In order to learn accurate safety value functions, existing PINNs-based HJ reachability solvers must rely on complex training pipelines and auxiliary supervision. In this work, we propose STEER2REACH (S2R), a PINNs-based HJ reachability solver that requires minimal modification on top of standard PINNs training. S2R's key contribution is a lightweight, low-overhead adaptive collocation sampling distribution constructed by steering forward trajectories using a combination of the optimal control and disturbance signals induced by the current value function, with injected stochastic exploration noise. We demonstrate that despite its simplicity, S2R achieves competitive--and in some cases improved--performance on safety metrics while reducing relative L2 error across a range of reachability benchmarks compared with SoTA MPC-guided HJ reachability solvers, all without requiring multi-stage training or MPC-based supervision.
Emergency collision avoidance under extreme driving conditions demands safety-critical control that accounts for both obstacle proximity and vehicle dynamic stability over a future time horizon, yet existing methods often rely on instantaneous or local safety evaluations. This paper proposes a safe reinforcement learning framework guided by a Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability based motion safety set that provides forward-looking safety supervision for constrained policy optimization. Specifically, a unified signed safety function is formulated by combining geometric collision margins and chassis stability limits, and is then extended through reachability analysis into a finite-horizon motion safety set that characterizes whether safety can be maintained under future vehicle state evolution. To enable practical computation, the motion safety set is approximated from offline extreme driving data, mitigating the computational burden of grid-based HJ solvers. The learned motion safety set is then embedded as a continuous safety cost into a constrained Markov decision process, and a PID-Lagrangian policy optimization scheme is employed to adaptively regulate the Lagrange multiplier for safety constraint enforcement. Simulation and real-vehicle experiments on low-adhesion obstacle-avoidance scenarios demonstrate that the proposed method achieves higher goal-reaching rates, produces smoother avoidance maneuvers, and maintains larger unified safety margins than baseline methods.