Worst-Case Discovery and Runtime Protection for RL-Based Network Controllers

Congestion controllers (CCs) are critical to network performance, and yet their robustness under adverse conditions remains insufficiently understood. While recent learning-based CCs have demonstrated strong performance in controlled environments, it is unclear how they compare to traditional CCs when controllers' input signals are corrupted or when environmental conditions become systematically challenging. In this paper, we introduce CCLab, an adversarial testing framework for systematically evaluating the robustness of both learning-based and non-learning-based CCs. CCLab includes a reinforcement learning (RL)-based adversarial agent that operates in a closed loop with the congestion control policy, generating bounded perturbations either on input signals (feature-level) or on external network conditions (environment-level), while preserving realism through explicit constraints. Using this framework, we compare learning-based CCs with non-learning-based CCs under both feature-level and environment-level adversarial conditions. While both types of CCs suffer from performance degradation under adversarial testing, we find that learning-based CCs, in general, are more robust than traditional human-designed algorithms. Finally, we show that our adversarial traces can be used to train more robust CCs that outperform existing learning-based CCs under both challenging and normal conditions.

Timely delivery of delay-sensitive information over dynamic, heterogeneous networks is essential for NextG interactive applications, yet providing strict End-to-End (E2E) peak latency guarantees remains an open challenge. Two obstacles limit the adoption of learning-based network control in this setting: traditional volume-based routing metrics, while highly effective for general traffic management, are not designed to capture traffic urgency; and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) controllers trained from scratch suffer from sample inefficiency, long training times, and early-stage exploration volatility. This paper introduces a deployment-focused network control framework that addresses both obstacles. First, we present Effective Congestion (EC), a deadline-aware metric family that quantifies interface congestion by packet urgency and proactively filters non-viable traffic, coupled with a Uniform Path Grouping (UPG) distribution heuristic promoting robust load-balancing; the resulting policies are embedded into Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Effective Congestion ($p^*$) (MADRL EC ($p^*$)), a hybrid architecture combining a distributed scheduler with a centralized RL-based router. Second, we introduce a unified training objective that generalizes existing policy-learning paradigms---behavioral cloning, offline Reinforcement Learning (RL), online RL, and offline-to-online schemes---as special cases, combining a live-reward term, a pre-collected-reward term, and a policy-imitation term. From this objective, we derive the Model-Guided Annealed Reinforcement Learning (MGA-RL) protocol, instantiated on a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) backbone: a deployment-oriented, demonstration-driven training approach that generalizes conventional Offline-to-Online (O2O) schemes, in which trajectories from a lightweight [...]

A properly calibrated rule-based autoscaler can beat every one of six mainstream deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms on cost across every workload we test - so when, if ever, does DRL actually help? We study this in RLScale-Bench, a reproducible benchmark and evaluation protocol for DRL on adaptive resource control, where an agent allocates compute to a dynamic workload under cost and service-level constraints. We evaluate PPO, DQN, A2C, SAC, TD3, and DDPG under matched architectures, training budgets, and reward functions against a calibrated rule-based baseline across six workload patterns and five seeds (240 runs), instantiate the benchmark on Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaling, and probe distribution-shift generalization. Three findings challenge common assumptions: (i) the calibrated controller achieves the lowest cost on all six workloads, though it trails the best RL agents on bursty and flash traffic; (ii) discrete-action algorithms outperform continuous-action ones by one to two orders of magnitude in constraint violations due to action-space mismatch; and (iii) no single algorithm dominates across workloads, with rankings shifting by up to four positions. The bottleneck in RL-based resource control is not algorithm selection but baseline calibration, reward engineering, and realistic evaluation protocols.