Edge-specific signal propagation on mature chromophore-region 3D mechanism graphs for fluorescent protein quantum-yield prediction

Protein-language systems are often evaluated by whether they generate plausible biological text, but a structural question has a sharper semantics: it denotes a measurement in a 3D coordinate system. We introduce ProtStructQA, an executable benchmark for protein structural question answering in which each natural-language question is generated from a hidden typed domain-specific language (DSL) program and the answer is obtained by executing that program on an AlphaFold-predicted structure. ProtStructQA releases 382.2K questions covering confidence, distances, predicted aligned error (PAE), solvent exposure, secondary structure, topology and contacts, and held-out compositions: a 330K active benchmark over 10K proteins from four species, plus a 52.2K hard-negative robustness pool. Without fine-tuning, we evaluate Qwen3 models from 0.6B to 8B under direct prompting, chain-of-thought, grammar-constrained executable voting, executable voting with chain-of-thought, and multi-turn ReAct-style tool use, and replicate the headline finding on Gemma-3-1B and Gemma-3-12B. We find a capability-dependent denotation threshold between Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B: below it, tool-mediated ReAct dominates because models often fail to produce executable denotations; above it, chain-of-thought flips from mostly harmful to strongly beneficial and becomes the strongest strategy on most splits. Parse-failure and family-level analyses show that the threshold is a transition from unparseable language to executable structural denotation, while grammar and execution remain selectively valuable for PAE and secondary-structure queries. ProtStructQA reframes scientific QA as compilation from language to measurement and provides a diagnostic testbed for when language models can map words to executable 3D structural measurements.

How do protein structure prediction models fold proteins? We investigate this question through causal interventions on the folding trunks of ESMFold, OpenFold, and Boltz-1. Across all three models, we find a shared two-stage computational structure. In the first stage, early blocks initialize pairwise biochemical signals: features like charge propagate from sequence into pairwise representations through architecture-specific pathways. In the second stage, late blocks develop pairwise spatial features: distance and contact information accumulate in the pairwise representation. We verify these mechanisms causally by showing that steering charge and distance features induces predictable structural changes. Furthermore, these representations are functionally interchangeable: pairwise states can be linearly aligned and substituted across models. Together, these results suggest that folding trunks with different architectures, inputs, and training procedures converge on a shared representational organization for mapping sequence chemistry into spatial geometry.

Small quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies are difficult when close molecular analogues have different activity labels. This paper asks whether a quantum kernel can add similarity information to a Morgan/Tanimoto fingerprint model, and which molecules account for the change. QBioFusion-QSAR uses quantum multiple kernel learning (QMKL): a support vector machine combines a Morgan/Tanimoto kernel with a quantum fidelity kernel constructed from fold-local components derived from RDKit and Mordred descriptors and Deep-PK features. Linear and radial basis function descriptor kernels are included as classical controls. On the 54-molecule PsychLight-A benchmark, Morgan/Tanimoto was the strongest single representation. In the primary stratified five-fold evaluation, QMKL increased accuracy from 0.815 to 0.833 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) from 0.613 to 0.645. Matched-regularization auditing attributed the change to N-Me-5-HT and N-Me-tryptamine changing from false-negative to true-positive predictions; activity-cliff subset MCC increased from 0.07 to 0.22. Repeating the five-fold protocol over ten random partitionings showed that learned QMKL did not exceed Morgan/Tanimoto on mean MCC; paired held-out bootstrap intervals for the matched comparison also span zero. These results support QBioFusion-QSAR as an auditable QMKL framework for identifying localized residual quantum-kernel contributions in small-data, activity-cliff-aware ligand classification.