Inductive Power Grid Cascading Failure Analysis with GRU-Gated Graph Attention

Networked systems, from power grids to traffic networks and cloud clusters, carry loads across nodes with limited capacity. A node whose load exceeds its capacity fails and sheds its load onto its neighbors, which can trigger a system-wide cascade. We study how to allocate a fixed capacity budget across nodes to resist these cascades under local load redistribution. The problem is difficult because no optimal allocation is known, and the fail-or-survive objective is non-differentiable and piecewise constant, so exact and gradient-based optimization methods do not directly apply. We introduce TANGCO (Topology-Aware Neural Graph-Guided Capacity Optimization), which uses a graph neural network policy trained through the cascade simulator with policy-gradient learning and a heuristic anchor. We evaluate TANGCO on five synthetic graph families and five real networks spanning power, road, air, and Internet topologies. The learned policy improves on the best of four hand-designed heuristics in all 450 synthetic instances and in 40 of 45 real-network conditions, with robustness gains ranging from 1.6% to 246%. The learned policies transfer to unseen graphs within a family and partially across related topologies, and TANGCO$^{pre}$, pre-trained on synthetic graphs, matches per-network training on unseen real networks. Training scales near-linearly with graph size, and TANGCO$^{pre}$ allocates on a new network with no per-target training, matching the deployment cost of a hand-designed heuristic. Free-vector variants without the GNN, stay close to the heuristics, so the graph representation carries the gain beyond numerical search. Finally, analysis of the learned allocations identifies when local risk is sufficient, leads to an improved closed-form heuristic, and reveals the regimes where a topology-aware learned policy remains necessary.

Cyber-physical power systems are vulnerable to cascading failures caused by tight interdependencies between power and communication infrastructures. Evaluating these failures over large N-k contingency sets with a high-fidelity simulator is computationally prohibitive for resilience planning. Using the previously published Modified Implicative Interdependency Model (MIIM) as the ground-truth cascade simulator, this paper develops a machine-learning surrogate that predicts contingency severity from leakage-free structural features and derives a component-criticality ranking for prioritized hardening analysis. On the IEEE 118-bus system, the Gradient Boosting surrogate achieves Spearman correlations of 0.849 for per-contingency severity prediction and 0.853 for per-component criticality ranking, while remaining stable across three independently sampled datasets. MIIM-derived component criticality itself reproduces only to a Spearman of approximately 0.85 under the present sampling pipeline, and the surrogate operates at this empirical ceiling to within sampling variation. Topological centrality measures on the full interdependent network provide meaningful baselines (Spearman 0.60-0.69), and feature ablation shows that the surrogate's advantage is driven primarily by inter-layer dependency information. These results support a two-stage workflow in which the surrogate rapidly ranks candidate components and MIIM is reserved for selective verification.

TokaMind is a multi-modal transformer (MMT) foundation model pre-trained on tokamak plasma diagnostics data from MAST, where it was shown to outperform CNN-based approaches on fusion benchmarks. We investigate whether its learned representations generalize to physically distinct but structurally analogous domains. Through systematic experimentation across four domains-industrial bearing degradation, NASA CMAPSS turbofan degradation, and two independent power grid PMU datasets-we identify four transfer-favoring characteristics that help explain where TokaMind's pretrained representations are most effective. Power grid synchrophasor data matches this target-domain profile most directly, while industrial degradation datasets demonstrate that TokaMind can still yield useful performance under partial alignment, especially when task design and feature construction expose physically meaningful degradation structure. On the GESL/PNNL 500-event benchmark with provider-aware evaluation, TokaMind achieves test $\text{F1} = 0.837 \pm 0.040$ (3seeds) for severe event classification. Our central finding, however, is not the aggregate score: classification difficulty is structurally determined by provider-level grid topology, not model capacity. In the single-window early-warning regime, TokaMind outperforms a CNN baseline (F10.889 vs.~0.878)--a reversal that disappears as more event windows are provided. Furthermore, Critical Slowing Down (CSD) indicators, used as a confidence gate rather than a classification label, improve F1 from 0.696 to 0.750 at 63% coverage-outperforming the CNN baseline (0.636) at any coverage level. These results establish the first cross-domain validation of TokaMind outside nuclear fusion and propose a transferability framework and revised evaluation protocol for multi-source PMU datasets.