Zero-shot proxies, also known as training-free metrics, are widely adopted to reduce the computational overhead in neural network evaluation for scenarios such as Neural Architecture Search (NAS), as they do not require any training. Existing zero-shot metrics have several limitations, including weak correlation with the true performance and poor generalisation across different networks or downstream tasks. For example, most of these metrics apply only to either convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or Transformers, but not both. To address these limitations, we propose Sample-Wise Activation Patterns (SWAP), and its derivative, SWAP-Score, a novel and highly effective zero-shot metric. SWAP-Score is broadly applicable across both architecture families and task domains, demonstrating strong predictive performance in the majority of tasks. This metric measures the expressivity of neural networks over a mini-batch of samples, showing a high correlation with the neural networks' ground-truth performance. For both CNNs and Transformers, the SWAP-Score outperforms existing zero-shot metrics across computer vision and natural language processing tasks. For instance, Spearman's correlation coefficient between the SWAP-Score and CIFAR-10 validation accuracy for DARTS CNNs is 0.93, and 0.71 for FlexiBERT Transformers on GLUE tasks. Moreover, SWAP-Score is label-independent, hence can be applied at the pre-training stage of language models to estimate their performance for downstream tasks. When applied to NAS, SWAP-empowered NAS, SWAP-NAS can achieve competitive performance using only approximately 6 and 9 minutes of GPU time, on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet respectively. Our code is available at: https://github.com/pym1024/SWAP_Universal
Training-free neural architecture search promises efficient discovery of high-performance networks without costly training. However, existing zero-cost proxies rely on fragmented heuristics that fail to capture the fundamental question: what makes an architecture trainable? This paper introduces Intrinsic Trainability (InTrain), a unified theoretical proxy that formalizes trainability as an architectural invariant emerging from two synergistic components: geometric capacity and optimization resilience. We operationalize intrinsic trainability through analysis of neural information processing. Geometric capacity is quantified via the participation ratio of activation covariance eigenspectrum, capturing the effective dimensionality of representation manifolds. Optimization resilience is measured through cumulative gradient health, assessing the robustness of backpropagation across network depth. InTrain synthesizes these dimensions through a scale-invariant multiplicative coupling, which we hypothesize is essential for capturing their synergistic, non-additive relationship. Extensive experiments on standard NAS benchmarks and search spaces demonstrate that InTrain achieves ranking correlations on par with state-of-the-art ensemble-based proxies and outperforms other single-metric methods.
Single-prompt first-token probabilities from zero-shot vision-language model (VLM) safety classifiers are treated as decision scores, but we show they are unreliable under semantically equivalent prompt reformulation: even when the binary label is constrained to a fixed output position, equivalent prompts can induce materially different unsafe probabilities for the same sample. Across multimodal safety benchmarks and multiple VLM families, cross-prompt variance is strongly associated with prompt-level disagreement and higher error, making it a useful fragility diagnostic. A training-free mean ensemble improves NLL on all 14 dataset-model evaluation pairs and ECE on 12/14 relative to a train-selected single-prompt baseline, and wins more head-to-head NLL comparisons than labeled temperature scaling, Platt scaling, and isotonic regression applied to the same prompt. Ranking gains are consistent against the train-selected baseline on both AUROC and AUPRC, and against the full 15-prompt distribution remain consistent on AUPRC while softening on AUROC. Labeled calibration on top of the mean provides further gains when labels are available, identifying prompt averaging as a strong label-free first stage rather than a replacement for calibration. We frame this as a reliability stress test for zero-shot VLM first-token safety scores and recommend prompt-family evaluation with mean aggregation as a standard label-free reliability baseline.
Recent work, such as Vision Banana, shows that lightweight instruction tuning can enable an image generator to achieve state-of-the-art performance across multiple visual perception tasks. Motivated by this perspective, we ask how far image generators can go on public visual perception benchmarks in a zero-shot setting. We introduce ProbeGen, a benchmark for zero-shot generative perception that casts monocular depth estimation, referring/reasoning segmentation, and object counting as conditional generation tasks specified through text prompts, and compares 20 models in total---including proprietary and open-weight image generators, specialist perception models, and MLLMs---across 11 published benchmarks. We observe that pretrained image generators show measurable zero-shot perceptual competence, but with a clear trade-off: specialist models remain stronger for in-distribution accuracy and efficiency, while generative models are often more robust under distribution shift and better at compositional semantic reasoning. We hope this study helps establish zero-shot generative perception as a meaningful research direction and provides a useful foundation for future work at the intersection of visual generation and understanding.