EGL-SCA: Structural Credit Assignment for Co-Evolving Instructions and Tools in Graph Reasoning Agents

Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks, where an agent powered by a large language model (LLM) sequentially samples the graph as evidence to support its final prediction. Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph, but both essentially rely on a shared reasoning policy across different graph regions, which can be suboptimal for graphs with heterogeneous structural and semantic patterns. Inspired by the progress of multi-agent collaboration on complex reasoning tasks, a natural remedy is to let multiple agents own different memory and collaborate; however, applying this paradigm to graphs directly faces two challenges. First, existing AGL methods typically verbalize graph structures into natural-language descriptions for LLM agents, making the reasoning process sensitive to the ordering of structural information and thereby breaking the permutation-invariant nature of graphs. Second, incorporating increasingly large sampled neighborhoods leads to rapidly growing contexts. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework. MAAGL partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization. MAAGL represents structural and semantic evidence separately. Structural evidence is summarized by a dynamically updated structural signature that is permutation-invariant and fixed in size, while semantic evidence is filtered to the top-k nodes ranked by relevance. Based on historical trajectories with similar signatures, agents estimate their confidence and trigger debate-style collaboration when needed. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.

Skill ecosystems for LLM agents have matured rapidly, yet recent benchmarks show that providing agents with more skills does not monotonically improve performance -- focused sets of 2-3 skills outperform comprehensive documentation, and excessive skills actually hurt. The bottleneck has shifted from skill availability to skill orchestration: agents need not more skills, but a structural mechanism to select, compose, and execute them with explicit causal dependencies. We propose GraSP, the first executable skill graph architecture that introduces a compilation layer between skill retrieval and execution. GraSP transforms flat skill sets into typed directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) with precondition-effect edges, executes them with node-level verification, and performs locality-bounded repair through five typed operators -- reducing replanning from O(N) to O(d^h). Across ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, WebShop, and InterCode with eight LLM backbones, GraSP outperforms ReAct, Reflexion, ExpeL, and flat skill baselines in every configuration, improving reward by up to +19 points over the strongest baseline while cutting environment steps by up to 41%. GraSP's advantage grows with task complexity and is robust to both skill over-retrieval and quality degradation, confirming that structured orchestration -- not larger skill libraries -- is the key to reliable agent execution.

Visual agents employ external visual tools within visual chains of thought to incorporate fine-grained evidence. While prior work has mainly studied these tools in visual search tasks, their role in more complex visual reasoning remains underexplored. In this paper, we move beyond simple visual search tasks to investigate more challenging tasks, including 3D spatial reasoning and medical visual question answering, where agents must integrate tool-acquired local evidence with the global context. We identify a {tool-use collapse phenomenon: models progressively stop using tools while still achieving higher task accuracy. Moreover, we observe a clear asymmetry: (i) completely eliminating tool use degrades performance, whereas (ii) incentivizing tool use yields only marginal gains despite substantially increasing usage. We find that vanilla training and tool-use encouragement both reduce rollout diversity, explaining why higher tool use does not yield stronger reasoning performance. Motivated by these findings, we add an entropy regularization term to encourage diverse rollout exploration, achieving the best performance despite gradually declining tool usage. Overall, our findings suggest a training-time view of tools as scaffolding, where broader exploration over language generation and visual tool invocation improves reasoning despite tool-use collapse. Project page: https://scaffolded-exploration.github.io