Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to optimize system performance in tasks such as resource management and network simulation. Unlike traditional ML tasks (e.g., image classification), networked systems often operate in heterogeneous, long-running, and dynamic environment states, where input conditions (e.g., network loads) and operational objectives can shift over time and across settings. Existing learning-based systems offer little support for adaptation, resulting in costly model training, extensive data collection, degraded system performance, and slow responsiveness. This paper presents EMA, the first model adaptation system supporting learning-based systems to adapt to evolving environments with minimal operational overhead. EMA takes a system-driven, data-centric approach that accommodates diverse system and model designs while addressing two key deployment challenges. First, it reduces expensive model training by introducing state transformers that align the input state of a new environment with previously similar states, allowing models to warm-start adaptation. Second, it addresses the often-overlooked yet costly process of data labeling--collecting ground truth for exploring and training on various system decisions--by prioritizing labeling high-utility data while balancing the tradeoff between training and labeling cost. Evaluations on eight representative learning-based systems show that EMA reduces adaptation costs (e.g., GPU training time) by 14.9-42.4% while improving system performance (e.g., network throughput) by 6.9-31.3%.
As machine learning(ML) systems evolve to continual adaptation, each re-training cycle uses compute, annotation, and energy. We introduce TIMEGATE, a policy layer managing adaptation by budgeting time, labeling, training, and evaluation. TIMEGATE emits a metric-availability signal M for partial vs. full-evaluation decisions. We validate: (i) labeling outperforms training by 2.3x on Adult tabular; (ii) it transfers to LLaMA-3.1-8B + QLoRA on SST-2 (accuracy 0.80 to 0.96; M =1 in 35/36 runs); (iii) M is informative, 28-cell sensitivity shows M drops to 0.81 at tight thresholds; (iv) 100-cycle simulation achieves 66% evaluation-compute savings with no silent mis-promotions; (v) 10%-slice evaluation on LLaMA uses 89% less wall-clock and energy on a single H200 (ratios agree to 0.2%).
Abhijit Chakraborty, Suddhasvatta Das, Yash Shah +2
Adapting pretrained models typically involves a trade-off between the high training costs of backpropagation and the heavy inference overhead of memory-based or in-context learning. We propose FAAST, a forward-only associative adaptation method that analytically compiles labeled examples into fast weights in a single pass. By eliminating memory or context dependence, FAAST achieves constant-time inference and decouples task adaptation from pretrained representation. Across image classification and language modeling benchmarks, FAAST matches or exceeds backprop-based adaptation while reducing adaptation time by over 90% and is competitive to memory/context-based adaptation while saving memory usage by up to 95%. These results demonstrate FAAST as a highly efficient, scalable solution for supervised task adaptation, particularly for resource-constrained models. We release the code and models at https://github.com/baoguangsheng/faast.
Stream learning is commonly evaluated through predictive performance and adaptation to concept drift. However, sustained operation of a stream learner also requires predictable and bounded resource usage even on long streams. This requirement becomes even more critical when learning moves from servers to near-sensor embedded systems where memory and processing are scarce resources. In state-of-the-art stream learning, however, we perceive a strong focus on concept drift adaptation, whereas resource usage is often an evaluation byproduct. To close this gap, we benchmark seven representative stream classifiers on 13 real and synthetic streams under model-size budgets from 128,KiB to approximately 8,MiB. Our benchmark comprises a total of 6,463 experiments. We measure failure-aware accuracy, peak model size, time to budget exhaustion, and prediction-plus-update latency. The results reveal two distinct resource failure modes. Adaptive ensembles can exceed small budgets almost immediately because of their initial footprint, even when their size remains stable thereafter. Incremental trees can fit initially but grow throughout a long stream, with HoeffdingTrees (HT) and Extremely Fast Decision Trees (EFDT) increasing by median factors of 7.37 and 5.87. Explicitly compact methods remain the only viable option under the smallest budgets, but are usually overtaken as larger budgets make adaptive ensembles competitive. Hence, many state-of-the-art methods are only partially applicable in embedded systems or for long-running systems. We therefore call on the stream-learning community to make bounded resource usage a first-class design objective alongside drift adaptation, and propose concrete steps toward this goal, including an API through which stream learners can explicitly expose and respect resource budgets.
Sebastian Buschjäger, Nuwan Gunasekara, Heitor Murilo Gomes