Detecting Privilege Escalation in Polyglot Microservices via Agentic Program Analysis

The advent of agentic vulnerability detection is already becoming a watershed moment for software security. Audits conducted entirely by autonomous LLM agents are uncovering critical vulnerabilities in fundamental software underpinning digital society. Many of these vulnerabilities remained masked for years, surfacing only now with AI agents. Yet the reasoning behind these discoveries remains alarmingly opaque and unvalidated. What assumptions did the agent make about a function's inputs when it deemed that function to be secure? Failures in reasoning and incorrect assumptions can lead to missed vulnerabilities and reduce trust in agentic analysis. We propose a security-specification-first paradigm that (1) exposes the agent's tacit assumptions explicitly as security specifications and (2) continuously refines those specifications via runtime falsification. We realize our approach in Code-Augur, a novel harness for agentic vulnerability detection. Given a codebase, Code-Augur analyzes each component of the system for vulnerable code. When it deems a component to be secure, it commits the local invariants behind that judgment as in-source assertions. In parallel, Code-Augur leverages a guided fuzzer to attempt to falsify those assumptions. When the fuzzer triggers an assertion, this either reveals a genuine vulnerability or a flawed specification to refine. In both cases, this process grounds the agent's understanding, aligning its view of code intent with how the code actually behaves. On real-world subjects, Code-Augur effectively leverages security specifications to detect more vulnerabilities than other state-of-the-art agents. Additionally, Code-Augur found 22 new vulnerabilities in key open-source projects. Compared to curated specialized models like Claude Mythos, Code-Augur offers effective agentic vulnerability detection built on widely available LLMs like Sonnet and DeepSeek.

Automated vulnerability discovery in large codebases remains challenging: traditional static analysis produces high false-positive rates, while dynamic approaches such as fuzzing require substantial infrastructure and often target narrow classes of bugs. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable semantic reasoning about program behavior, but applying LLMs to repository-scale security analysis introduces challenges related to context management, cost, and verification. We present OpenAnt, an open-source vulnerability discovery system that integrates static program analysis with LLM-based reasoning in a multi-stage pipeline. OpenAnt introduces three key techniques. First, codebases are decomposed into self-contained analysis units filtered by reachability from external entry points, reducing the analysis surface by up to 97% while preserving attack-relevant code. Second, candidate vulnerabilities undergo adversarial verification through constrained attacker simulation, where the model evaluates exploitability under realistic attacker capabilities. Third, findings are validated through dynamic verification, in which exploit environments are generated automatically, executed in sandboxed containers, and discarded after use. Evaluation on widely used open-source projects including OpenSSL, WordPress, and Flowise shows that this architecture can identify previously unknown vulnerabilities while maintaining manageable analysis cost and substantially reducing false positives. Our results suggest that closed-loop vulnerability discovery pipelines, combining semantic reasoning with exploit validation, provide a practical path toward scalable automated security analysis. OpenAnt is released as open source under the Apache 2.0 license at https://github.com/knostic/OpenAnt.

LLM agents have been increasingly adopted for solving security tasks. However, existing evaluations usually require source code access, while commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) binaries dominate deployed software and require reasoning from stripped, optimized machine code. This discrepancy raises an important question: can modern LLM agents reason about vulnerabilities in critical COTS binaries? Motivated by this question, we build SLYP, a REACT-style pipeline for end-to-end vulnerability discovery and validation of COTS binaries. SLYP combines extensible MCP servers for binary exploration and dynamic debugging, and validates candidate vulnerabilities by synthesizing debugger-verified proof-of-concept (PoC) crashes. We evaluate SLYP and production coding agents, including Claude Code and Codex, on COTS Windows binaries centered on a 20-object COM benchmark. SLYP uncovers all 64 vulnerable entry functions while default production agents miss up to 15; SLYP also surfaces more true vulnerabilities than the state-of-the-art static analyzer, which discovers at most 35 with a large number of false positives. For validation, SLYP generates debugger-verified PoCs for 67.5% of cases, while default production agents generate none. Further ablations show that tool sets and model choice materially affect COTS binary reasoning. Our additional evaluation also demonstrates the generalizability of SLYP on Windows kernel targets. To date, SLYP has uncovered 39 zero-day vulnerabilities, 31 in COM/RPC services and 8 in kernel drivers, all disclosed to the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), with 23 assigned CVEs and $203,000 bounty awards.