Credit default prediction is a tabular learning problem with severe class imbalance, heterogeneous features, and tight latency budgets. Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) approach this problem through in-context learning, which makes their predictions sensitive to how the context window is built. We benchmark four classical models and five TFMs on the Home Credit and Lending Club datasets, varying the context-construction strategy (seven options) and the context size (1K to 50K). On both datasets, the choice of context strategy explains more variance in AUC-ROC than the choice of TFM family: balanced and hybrid sampling add 3 to 4 AUC points over uniform sampling, and the gap exceeds the spread between TFMs. With a balanced context of 5K to 10K examples, the strongest TFMs reach the AUC of classical baselines trained on the full data, while also recovering meaningful default-class recall that default-threshold GBDTs do not. We frame this as evidence that context construction, rather than architecture choice, is the primary deployment lever for TFMs in imbalanced credit-risk settings.
Predictive models play a pivotal role in credit risk management, guiding critical decisions through accurate estimation of default probabilities and losses. Extensive research has introduced new modeling techniques, complemented by large-scale benchmarking studies consolidating the state-of-the-art. Today, quasi-standards such as gradient-boosting models paired with SHAP explainers have emerged, yet continuous improvement of risk models remains a top priority. Concurrently, rapid advancements in AI, most notably large language models, have disrupted predictive modeling paradigms. Foundation models, pretrained on extensive datasets from diverse domains, have demonstrated remarkable performance by leveraging prior knowledge. While prevalent in natural language processing and computer vision, foundation models for tabular data have only recently emerged. We conjecture that pretraining on out-of-domain data is particularly beneficial in small-data settings, such as SME lending or specialized corporate portfolios, and may help address longstanding challenges including low default portfolios and class imbalance. This paper benchmarks recently proposed tabular foundation models against a broad set of competitors, including established and advanced machine learning techniques, across two core tasks: PD and LGD modeling. Our evaluation encompasses various datasets, performance indicators, and experimental conditions. We find that tabular foundation models generally perform best across datasets and tasks. Moreover, they offer significant improvement in predictive performance as dataset size shrinks. These results are remarkable given that the models are tested out-of-the-box, without hyperparameter tuning, ensuring ease of use and mitigating computational costs.
Bart Baesens, Andreas Goethals, Stefan Lessmann +10
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) now match or beat tuned gradient-boosted trees on a growing fraction of tabular tasks, but no single TFM wins on every dataset. Ensembling is the go to fix here, and it works less well than expected. Six modern TFMs form a near-redundant pool: their mean pairwise Q-statistic is 0.961, close enough to 1 that any convex combination is bounded above. We benchmark six ensemble strategies over six TFMs on 153 OpenML classification tasks. The best ensemble, two-level cascade stacking, buys +0.18% accuracy over the strongest single TFM at 253× the compute. A Friedman and Nemenyi analysis places three ensembles and the best base TFM in a single equivalence group; three other ensembles are significantly \emph{worse} than the best base. Stacking with a logistic-regression meta-learner is the most striking case: competitive accuracy and ROC-AUC, the worst log-loss rank among the ensembles. The meta-learner improves accuracy by sharpening class boundaries, which destroys calibration. We recommend greedy selection as the practical default.
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for in-context learning on structured data, enabling direct prediction on new tabular tasks without task-specific training. However, their effectiveness is constrained by context length limits, restricting application to medium-scale data and degrading performance when inference-time data exceed pretraining size distributions. Our work introduces VIP-COP, estimating the Value of Importance for Prediction of training examples and features for hard Context OPtimization for TFMs. Its explicit selection mechanism suppresses noise and isolates influential data, enabling the model to also benefit from data augmentation by prioritizing high-value augmented samples and features. VIP-COP is (i) fast, boosting performance often within minutes of optimization, based on an online KernelSHAP-based regression with iterative refinement, value-guided context sampling, and multi-fidelity pruning; (ii) budget-aware and any-time, improving with additional test-time compute unlike heuristics that produce fixed contexts; (iii) model-aware yet fully black-box, requiring no access to model internals, making it compatible with both proprietary and open-source TFMs; (iv) interpretable, identifying discrete ``Very Important Predictors'' (samples and features) that maximize signal-to-noise, which makes it (v) robust, isolating high-value data from noise. In contrast, soft-prompt optimization requires model gradients, produces abstract latent tokens, and lacks explicit signal discrimination. Extensive experiments show that VIP-COP consistently outperforms heuristic and optimized baselines across large-scale high-dimensional testbeds, including data augmentation and data-noise settings, establishing a new state of the art in test-time context refinement for TFMs.