A Heuristic Approach for Performance Tuning in RL-based Quadrotor Control via Reward Design and Termination Conditions

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for quadrotor flight control typically relies on Domain Randomization (DR) for sim-to-real transfer, resulting in overly conservative policies that struggle with dynamic disturbances. To overcome this, we propose a novel adaptive control architecture that actively perceives and reacts to instantaneous perturbations. First, we train an optimal outer-loop policy, then replace its reliance on ground-truth disturbance data with a Residual Dynamics Predictor (RDP). The RDP estimates the external forces and moments acting on the aircraft in flight online using only the history of states and control actions. For seamless hardware transfer, we introduce a data-efficient linear calibration bridge and an online thrust correction mechanism that align the simulated latent space with reality using mere seconds of flight data. Real-world validations on a Crazyflie micro-quadrotor demonstrate that our adaptive controller significantly outperforms baselines, maintaining precise trajectory tracking under severe uncertainties including mass variations, asymmetric payloads, and dynamic slung loads

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly quadcopters, present unique challenges for autonomous control due to their underactuated dynamics: only four available control inputs must govern six degrees of freedom. This paper investigates a physics-aware, end-to-end deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach that acts directly on low-level body inputs, total thrust and body torques $(T, τ_x, τ_y, τ_z)$, and closes the loop through a high-fidelity Simulink environment. Our simulator integrates a 12-state rigid-body model (MATLAB Level-2 S-Function) with (i) an Action2RPM allocation based on the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of a coefficient matrix derived from thrust and drag terms, and (ii) first-order actuator dynamics for each motor (time constant $T_m = 0.076$ s), including rotor gyroscopic coupling. A shaped reward balances goal-reaching and stability using an exponential position well, attitude penalties, and quadratic velocity costs. Four DRL algorithms, DDPG, TD3, PPO, and SAC, are evaluated in two stages: (S1) thrust-only hover and (S2) hover with pitch torque and a translated goal. Results show that SAC and TD3 achieve superior stability and exploration efficiency, while PPO is less sample-efficient. The study highlights the significance of modeling actuator lags and aerodynamic moments for stable low-level control and provides a reproducible benchmark for quadcopter DRL.

Small multirotor aircraft are increasingly tasked with operations in the atmospheric boundary layer, where turbulent winds comparable to the vehicle's airspeed degrade trajectory tracking and can defeat conventional feedback control. This work illustrates a two-stage learning pipeline that first estimates the local wind from onboard kinematics and dynamics and then exploits that estimate inside a reinforcement learning (RL) flight controller. The wind estimator, an attention-augmented gated recurrent network trained on thousands of simulated flights through von Karman turbulence with power-law shear and veer, recovers the horizontal wind vector with a per-flight root-mean-square error of 0.40 m/s and a direction error of 3.2 degrees on unseen wind regimes, an accuracy near the floor imposed by unresolved turbulence, and generalizes to vertical ascent profiles with a skill score of 0.861 over a constant-wind reference. A proximal policy optimization controller receiving the frozen estimator's output reduces horizontal trajectory tracking error by 48% relative to a wind-blind proportional-derivative baseline across mean winds of 4 m/s to 12 m/s, winning on 100% of evaluation episodes. A three-way ablation decomposes this improvement into a kinematic component, available without wind information, and a wind-perception component; the perception share rises with wind speed, from small in light winds toward roughly half the total benefit in strong winds, consistent with the quadratic scaling of aerodynamic drag. The controller degrades gracefully on out-of-distribution winds of 13 m/s to 15 m/s, where the baseline fails catastrophically.