Authors: Francesco Granata, Lorenzo Lamazzi, Misael Mongiovì, Francesco Poggi, Valeria Secchini
Organizations: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Italy · Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology, National Research Council, Italy
We present RAGEAR (Retrieval-Augmented Graph-Enhanced Academic Recommender), a neurosymbolic recommender system for academic course recommendation. RAGEAR combines dense retrieval over full lecture transcripts with a symbolic Knowledge Graph modelling courses, lessons, transcript chunks, credits, study plans, and curricular information. The Knowledge Graph supports symbolic filtering and contextualisation based on structured constraints, such as credits, academic disciplines, study plans, and prerequisites. Unlike metadata-based approaches, it exploits fine-grained instructional content by retrieving transcript chunks semantically aligned with a student's query. The main contribution is a graph-aware aggregation function that propagates chunk-level evidence to course-level recommendations. The score combines three factors: the share of retrieved similarity associated with a course, the rank-based strength of its relevant chunks, and the distribution of evidence across lessons. We evaluate RAGEAR on 152 student-like queries through a human evaluation sample and a large-scale LLM-based relevance assessment. Results show that lecture transcripts improve over metadata-only retrieval, and that RAGEAR further improves ranking quality over a transcript-based normalized SumP baseline, especially for top-ranked recommendations.
The correct sequence of courses in the curriculum based on prerequisites between courses is of great importance for students to develop their knowledge and skills holistically. However, students crafting this sequence in isolation frequently struggle with recognition limitations and information overload that leads to confusion. Simultaneously, education institutions encounter difficulties in providing adequate academic advice for the correct sequence due to limited education resources. To address these challenges, we propose a locally deployed RAG-based academic advising system grounded in syllabus information. By combining large language models with retrieval from structured syllabus data, the system is designed to support course selection, prerequisite understanding, and personalized study planning in a privacy-preserving manner.
We present a comparative evaluation of six information retrieval methods for the task of academic advisor discovery: ranking CS faculty members by relevance to a graduate applicant's research interest statement. The methods span sparse lexical matching (Jaccard overlap, TF-IDF, BM25), dense semantic retrieval (all-MiniLM-L6-v2 sentence embeddings), hybrid score fusion, and learning-to-rank. Evaluation uses a new domain-specific collection: 768 faculty profiles scraped from 9 US CS departments, with 162 graded relevance judgments (grade 0/1/2) across 5 queries representing distinct graduate student research profiles. Across all five queries, Reranked achieves the highest mean NDCG@10 (0.477, std 0.138), followed by Semantic (0.450), Hybrid (0.421), BM25 (0.406), Jaccard (0.303), and TF-IDF (0.246). After Bonferroni correction across all 15 pairwise comparisons, TF-IDF is significantly worse than BM25, Semantic, Hybrid, and Reranked; no other pairwise difference survives correction at 5 queries. A field ablation reveals that biography alone (NDCG 0.634) outperforms the full model combining biography with research area tags (0.593). A controlled experiment shows that concatenating arXiv paper abstracts reduces NDCG@10 by 0.176, motivating a late-fusion architecture. All code, scrapers, and relevance labels are released openly.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for next-generation recommender systems, offering strong semantic understanding and natural-language reasoning abilities. Despite recent progress, current LLM-based recommenders still face key challenges in constructing decision-relevant contexts from heterogeneous evidence. First, existing methods often rely on fixed context construction strategies: collaborative behavioral evidence and item-side metadata are typically incorporated through predefined prompts, static retrieval pipelines, or handcrafted injection mechanisms, making it difficult to determine what information is truly beneficial for each instance. Second, heterogeneous evidence introduces a severe context-efficiency bottleneck. Rich metadata and collaborative interaction records can quickly overwhelm the context window, while aggressive compression or heuristic filtering may discard fine-grained evidence critical for accurate recommendation. To address these challenges, we propose RRCM, a ranking-driven retrieval-and-reasoning framework over collaborative and metadata memories for LLM-based agentic recommendation. RRCM starts from a lightweight user-history context and learns whether to recommend directly, retrieve collaborative evidence, retrieve item metadata, or interleave both through reasoning. Both memories are represented in natural language and accessed through a unified retrieval interface, enabling flexible evidence acquisition without handcrafted CF injection or fixed retrieval rules. We optimize this memory-reading policy with an outcome-only ranking reward, instantiated using group relative policy optimization, so that retrieval decisions are directly driven by final top-k recommendation quality. Extensive experiments show that RRCM significantly outperforms traditional baselines and diverse LLM-based recommendation approaches.