cs.CVMay 30, 2026

CAFOSat: A Strongly Annotated Dataset for Infrastructure-Aware CAFO Mapping Using High-Resolution Imagery

Authors: Oishee Bintey Hoque, Nibir Chandra Mandal, Mandy L Wilson, Samarth Swarup, Madhav Marathe, Abhijin Adiga

Organizations: University of Virginia · Biocomplexity Institute, University of Virginia

Abstract

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) play an important role in agricultural production but are also associated with environmental, public health, and disease surveillance concerns. Large-scale mapping of CAFOs from remote sensing imagery remains challenging due to heterogeneous infrastructure layouts, noisy location records, inconsistent annotations, and incomplete inventories. We introduce CAFOSat, a strongly annotated, infrastructure-aware dataset for CAFO mapping across the United States. CAFOSat integrates high-resolution National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery with multi-source CAFO inventories collected across multiple states and transforms weak geolocation records into refined annotations through a human-in-the-loop pipeline combining AI-assisted annotation, GradCAM-based localization, and geometric clustering. To improve dataset quality, we curate challenging negative samples using land-cover-guided sampling with spatial exclusion constraints and provide infrastructure-level annotations, including barns, manure ponds, and grazing-related features, through manual verification. The resulting dataset contains more than 45,000 image patches spanning 20 states and four major CAFO categories. We benchmark a diverse set of convolutional, transformer-based, and vision-language models, demonstrating the value of refined annotations and curated negative samples for CAFO classification and generalization. In addition, we introduce a synthetic augmentation pipeline that generates infrastructure-aware variations to increase training diversity and improve robustness under distribution shifts. CAFOSat provides a large-scale benchmark for advancing infrastructure-aware agricultural monitoring and CAFO mapping from high-resolution remote sensing imagery.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 14, 2026cs.CV

Weakly Supervised Spatio-Temporal Candidate Discovery of Dairy Farm Sites from Seasonal Satellite Imagery

Farm site discovery from satellite imagery is a spatiotemporal candidate ranking problem because farm evidence is distributed across pasture, field boundaries, roads, buildings, and seasonal vegetation patterns. Direct farm labels are often incomplete, which makes fully supervised detection difficult. This paper proposes a weakly supervised pipeline for ranking dairy farm candidate clusters from seasonal Sentinel imagery and open map priors. The method uses aligned spring, summer, and autumn image tiles from County Cork, Ireland, with spectral bands, vegetation indices, built area indices, and a pasture channel. A Barlow Twins encoder learns multi-season tile embeddings without farm labels. In parallel, weak OpenStreetMap farm priors are split into a prior and a held-out set. Prior features support a rule-based tile score that combines farm proximity, seasonal pasture evidence, and summer greenness, while held-out features are reserved only for proxy evaluation. The rule score is smoothed over a spatial representation graph using geographic proximity and embedding similarity, and high-scoring tiles are grouped into ranked candidate clusters. From 26,722 valid tiles, the main run selects 535 high-confidence tiles and forms 71 candidate clusters. The top 5 clusters achieve 0.60 precision within 500 m and 0.80 precision within 1000 m of held-out OpenStreetMap farm features. The top 10 clusters achieve 0.40 precision within 500 m and 0.80 precision within 1000 m. The results show that seasonal representation learning and weak geographic priors can reduce large satellite image collections into compact candidate sets for human review.
Usman Haider, Fatima Khalid, Karl Mason
Satellite ImagerySpatiotemporal RepresentationsCandidate
AskPDF
Jul 24, 2026cs.CV

Farmland Extent and Visible Boundary Mapping from 1 m NAIP Imagery Using Residual U-Net and Text-Prompted SAM 3 Refinement

Agricultural field maps are often proprietary, incomplete, or outdated, yet they provide the spatial framework for crop monitoring, production accounting, and land-conversion analysis. This study presents a reproducible workflow for mapping farmland extent and visible boundaries from 1 m NAIP RGB imagery. Thirty-seven scenes spanning open cropland, peri-urban interfaces, semi-arid irrigation geometries, and fragmented mosaics were annotated in CVAT and converted to binary masks. Non-overlapping 256 x 256 patches yielded 5,698 samples, split by source scene into 3,850 training, 770 validation, and 1,078 test patches. A residual U-Net (ResUNet) trained with a Dice-dominant loss, L = 2.5(1 - Dice) + BCE, achieved test accuracy 0.8808, IoU 0.8605, Dice 0.9234, precision 0.8766, and recall 0.9794. A frozen SAM 3 branch prompted with "agricultural farmland field" was fused with ResUNet by logical OR. On selected difficult patches, Dice improved from 0.858 to 0.955 (orchard rows) and from 0.804 to 0.903 (fragmented parcels). Sliding-window stitching produced coherent regional masks (example tile Dice 0.898 and 0.919). The product is a semantic farmland-extent layer, not a cadastral parcel map, and supports agricultural monitoring where current field layers are unavailable.
Mohammadreza Narimani, Vikram Anand, Parastoo Farajpoor
Precision AgricultureU-NetImage CroppingRed-Green-BlueBoundaries
AskPDF
Jun 29, 2026cs.CV

Benchmarking Geospatial Foundation Models for Agriculture Applications

Geospatial foundation models pretrained on satellite imagery promise broad generalization across remote sensing tasks and regions, but their geographic transferability has not been systematically tested, especially in agriculture applications. This paper presents a controlled benchmark that evaluates three models, Prithvi, SpectralGPT, and SatMAE, on multi-temporal crop segmentation and change detection across four U.S. states, Iowa, North Carolina, California, and Minnesota. By assigning each train, validation, and test split to a separate region, we measure how well each model transfers to land it has not seen. All three degrade sharply under regional distribution shift, predicting only the most common crops while missing rare ones. We further find that fitting these models to a shared input format affects each one differently, which complicates direct architectural comparison. These results expose key limitations of current geospatial foundation models for agriculture and point to region aware evaluation as a necessary standard.
Zhuocheng Shang, Sanmay Das, Ahmed Eldawy
Geospatial Foundation ModelsPrecision AgricultureSatellite ImageryFoundation Model
AskPDF