Closed-Loop Molecular Design with Calibrated Deference

Early-stage molecular design is an iterative process, not just a task of generating molecules. Researchers turn broad goals into design strategies, refine candidates, assess many properties, and gather evidence before synthesis and tests. AI methods can generate molecules, optimize several goals, predict properties, dock compounds, and account for synthesis. Yet these functions are spread across specialized tools. Experts must still coordinate each step, judge interim results, and integrate evidence. The central challenge is thus to turn research intent into adaptive, traceable runs grounded in scientific tools. We cast this challenge as intent-to-evidence molecular design workflow execution and present CAi Copilot, an expert-oriented agent with three linked layers. The Research Interface Layer turns intent into an executable plan. The Agent Reasoning Layer uses interim results to guide each run. The Execution Substrate supplies molecular tools, metrics, reusable utilities, and backend services. Across 45 tasks, CAi achieves the strongest overall performance, with an outcome score of 84.59, exceeding the next-best result by 18.07 points. Additional benchmarks test how CAi coordinates generation, screening, and multi-criteria evaluation, while exposing limits in long-horizon execution. These results show that CAi turns broad molecular-design intent into transparent, traceable workflows that connect interim decisions to candidate-level evidence.

Can a general-purpose large language model design molecules with the precision of a seasoned chemist? Current LLM-based frameworks answer this question with scalar feedback loops - generate, score, reject - that amount to informed trial-and-error. Here we show that replacing a single number with the full physicochemical rationale from first-principles calculations transforms the LLM from a stochastic sampler into a causal reasoner. Our system couples retrieval-augmented generation with a self-reflection module that feeds orbital energies, atomic charges, and electron densities - rather than compressed scores - back into the design loop. On HOMO-LUMO gap targets from 2.0 to 5.0 eV, this structure-property-relationship (SPR) reflection achieves a deviation as low as 0.0014 eV with a 100% success rate under the SPR+RAG configuration, consistently outperforming scalar-feedback and non-reflective baselines in median and mean deviation. The framework generalizes seamlessly to dipole-moment design, synthetic accessibility optimization, and molecular docking, and proves robust across 7 distinct LLM backbones. These results establish a new paradigm: when the model understands not only that a molecule fails, but why, iterative molecular design becomes genuinely mechanistic.

Inverse design of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) requires searching a combinatorially vast space where property labels are expensive and most machine-learning models reveal little about why a structure succeeds. We introduce LLM4MOF, a closed-loop framework in which language-model agents reason about chemistry, build candidate MOFs, and test them in simulation, refining hypotheses over ten autonomous iterations. One agent proposes interpretable design hypotheses over metal nodes, linkers, pore geometry, and functional chemistry, and a second translates them into constraints that select candidate MOFs, each made of a metal node, organic linker, and matching topology. Each hypothesis is tested through four diagnostic beams that apply different subsets of its constraints, so comparing them shows whether geometry, chemistry, or metal choice drives performance. Even when blind to the global property landscape of databases, LLM4MOF concentrates its search on top-performing structures across six adsorption, separation, and electronic-structure tasks within 400 property evaluations. The same loop also generates new MOFs de novo and validates them in live simulation, where it adapts the geometry to each requested condition, outperforming random search and a genetic algorithm at roughly $1 per campaign. LLM4MOF shows that language-model agents can run interpretable, simulation-grounded inverse design without training a model per objective.