Horse Eye Blink Detection and Classification for Equine Affective State Assessment

Monitoring respiration parameters such as respiratory rate could be beneficial to understand the impact of training on equine health and performance and ultimately improve equine welfare. In this work, we compare deep learning-based methods to an adapted signal processing method to automatically detect cyclic respiratory events and extract the dynamic respiratory rate from microphone recordings during high intensity exercise in Standardbred trotters. Our deep learning models are able to detect exhalation sounds (median F1 score of 0.94) in noisy microphone signals and show promising results on unlabelled signals at lower exercising intensity, where the exhalation sounds are less recognisable. Temporal convolutional networks were better at detecting exhalation events and estimating dynamic respiratory rates (median F1: 0.94, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) $\pm$ Confidence Intervals (CI): 1.44$\pm$1.04 bpm, Limits Of Agreements (LOA): 0.63$\pm$7.06 bpm) than long short-term memory networks (median F1: 0.90, MAE$\pm$CI: 3.11$\pm$1.58 bpm) and signal processing methods (MAE$\pm$CI: 2.36$\pm$1.11 bpm). This work is the first to automatically detect equine respiratory sounds and automatically compute dynamic respiratory rates in exercising horses. In the future, our models will be validated on lower exercising intensity sounds and different microphone placements will be evaluated in order to find the best combination for regular monitoring.

Automated pain recognition from facial expression could make continuous welfare assessment practical in sheep, but adoption depends on trust: a stockperson cannot act on a score that arrives without justification. We ground a model in the Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale (SPFES) by letting each detected facial region attend over text embeddings of the clinical descriptors and then test whether the resulting explanations mean anything. They do not. Ablating an entire descriptor changes the predicted logit by about $10^{-4}$, and the most-attended cue agrees with the predicted pain level in only $32.6\%$ of regions, although the attention maps, the learned gate, and the generated text all proposed otherwise. We therefore remove the appearance bypass with a concept bottleneck whose classifier reads only SPFES concept scores, supervised by per-region state annotations that image-level pipelines discard. This costs $0.05$--$0.10$ in Cohen's $κ$ but yields concepts that are demonstrably learned: minority pain-indicating states are recovered at $3.5$--$8.3\times$ their base rates, and the ear and eye severity orderings emerge without severity supervision. Removing the supervision alone leaves $κ$ unchanged while concept accuracy falls to $0.109$, showing that architectural necessity does not imply semantic validity. We also show that pooled concept accuracy is misleading under clinical imbalance and provide a cross-validated, protocol-matched benchmark of seven methods on this dataset.

Infectious bovine pinkeye is a contagious ocular disease that adversely affects cattle health, welfare, and agricultural productivity. Conventional diagnosis relies primarily on clinical observation, which can be subjective, time-consuming, and difficult to implement efficiently in large herds or remote settings. This study evaluated and compared You Only Look Once (YOLO) v11 and YOLOv26 for automated bovine pinkeye classification and investigated the effects of class-balancing strategies on model performance. Five variants (n, s, m, l, and x) of each architecture were trained and evaluated using the original imbalanced dataset, Random Minority Oversampling (RMO), and an adapted Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Both YOLOv11 and YOLOv26 demonstrated strong classification performance, although the effects of class balancing varied across model variants. For YOLOv11, RMO-s achieved an accuracy of 0.99, a macro F1-score of 0.98, and a true positive rate (TPR) of 1.00, with no false-negative classifications. RMO-m also achieved a TPR of 1.00 with no false negatives. For YOLOv26, the original l, RMO-m, and RMO-l variants each achieved an accuracy of 0.99 and a macro F1-score of 0.98, with RMO-l attaining a TPR of 1.00 and no false negatives. Overall, RMO generally provided greater improvements in minority-class detection than adapted SMOTE, whereas the strong performance of the original YOLOv26-l demonstrates that oversampling was not necessary for all model variants. These findings demonstrate the potential of YOLOv11 and YOLOv26 for automated detection of bovine pinkeye and support further evaluation for livestock health monitoring.