A Resilience-as-a-Service assessment framework for coordinated disruption response in interdependent urban transit systems

Demand-responsive transit (DRT) is a flexible alternative to traditional, fixed-route mass-transit networks. Although DRT can function well in low-density communities, high operating costs and low reliability are common issues. We propose that these issues can be mitigated by moving from a centralized, manually-scheduled scheme to a distributed system capable of dynamically routing multiple vehicles using a slime-mold-inspired routing algorithm to maximize network effectiveness. We additionally introduce the method of dynamic transfers to further optimize transit network efficiency. All passenger allocation and dynamic transfers are handled via a continual cooperative bidding process by the buses. In this paper, we present simulated results for a swarm-driven transit network in suburban, urban, and semi-rural scenarios, using map networks pulled from OpenStreetMap. We show that our approach increases passenger delivery rates relative to a fixed-network approach by 28%, 49%, and 101%, respectively, and results in over 75% reduction in walking time in all cases.

Equilibrium analysis of urban mobility systems is formulated in a high-dimensional indicator space, whilst data availability varies sharply across cities and disruption contexts. This paper gives a formal treatment of that mismatch. It presents a dynamic multi-layer equilibrium attractor for disrupted urban mobility, in which a fast performance layer relaxes towards an indicator-dependent target, a slow strategic layer supplies a joint traffic, modal and learning fixed point, and antifragility is classified through a statistical decision rule on the post-to-baseline performance ratio. It then characterises when a lower-dimensional indicator projection is faithful to this equilibrium structure, establishing four results: conditions for exact and approximate projectability of the attractor with an explicit error bound; preservation of the coupled two-layer fixed point up to a contraction boundary; the retained Fisher information and decision power of any indicator support under a measurement model on observable urban indicators; and a one-sided restoration-time bias, whereby reduced monitoring can only understate recovery duration. A simulation study on three stylised pilot-city configurations verifies each result, and shows that two observable channels suffice for the candidate classification target where the indicator catalogue permits. The framework gives city authorities a principled basis for deciding which indicators must be maintained.

Accurate and coherent passenger demand forecasting is essential for Urban Rail Transit (URT) operations. Passenger demand has a hierarchical structure in which origin-destination (OD) flows aggregate to station-level inflows and outflows through conservation constraints. In practice, station-level and OD-level forecasts are often generated independently, producing incoherent predictions that violate these constraints and introduce inconsistencies into operational decision-making. Such issues become more severe during disruptions, when forecasting reliability is most critical. This paper presents the first hierarchical forecast reconciliation framework for joint station-level and OD-level URT demand prediction. A neural Fully Connected Reconciler (FCR) learns a non-linear mapping from incoherent base forecasts to coherent hierarchical predictions while guaranteeing exact structural consistency by construction. The method is benchmarked against OLS, WLS, and Minimum Trace (MinT) variants using Rejsekort smart-card data from the Copenhagen S-train network under one-step, multi-step, and disruption forecasting scenarios. Results show that reconciliation consistently improves OD forecasting accuracy while ensuring hierarchical coherence. Under normal conditions, FCR performs competitively with MinT-based methods. An oracle analysis indicates that perfect station-level forecasts could reduce OD prediction error by up to 34 percent, highlighting the value of improved base forecasts. Under severe disruptions, FCR outperforms classical methods, reducing OD forecasting error by up to 17.45 percent in multi-step destination-side delay scenarios. These findings establish hierarchical reconciliation as an effective mechanism for improving forecast robustness, with the largest benefits occurring under the most challenging operating conditions.