FMplex: Model Virtualization for Serving Extensible Foundation Models
Authors: Hetvi Shastri, Pragya Sharma, Walid A. Hanafy, David Irwin, Mani Srivastava, Prashant Shenoy
Organizations: University of Massachusetts Amherst · University of California Los Angeles
Abstract
Foundation models (FMs) are increasingly used as backbones for downstream tasks across language, vision, time-series, and multimodal applications. Yet existing model-serving systems deploy each customized task as an independent model instance, thereby replicating heavyweight backbones, wasting accelerator memory, and losing opportunities to amortize batching and loading costs. This paper presents FMplex, a serving system that treats FM backbones as a virtualization substrate for deployment sharing. FMplex presents each task with a virtual foundation model (vFM), a logically private FM instance backed by a shared physical FM. This abstraction lets independently customized tasks share a backbone while preserving task-specific extensions, independent lifecycles, and task-level isolation. In addition, we propose a batch-aware fair-queueing scheduler that combines weighted task-level sharing with inter- and intra-task batching across colocated tasks. We implement a FMplex-based serving stack spanning task construction, sharing-aware deployment, and runtime execution. Across 7 FM backbones (16 variants) and 92 downstream tasks, FMplex reduces latency by up to 80% over spatial partitioning and 33.3% over best-effort co-location, while hosting up to 6x more tasks at cluster scale.
AI applications have shifted from single, monolithic foundation models (FM) to compound agentic systems. Yet today's stacks remain fragmented: even as protocols (e.g., MCP, A2A) ease tool/agent connectivity, each framework embeds an implicit runtime for state, memory, budgets, and guardrails, making behavior non-portable and governance brittle. It mirrors computing before operating systems, when every program re-implemented basic services. This position paper argues that the field now needs a Foundation Model Operating System (FMOS) -- a system layer that virtualizes FM interactions analogous to how virtual machines abstract physical hardware, giving applications the illusion of dedicated, trustworthy FM instances with effectively unbounded capabilities. Internally, the FMOS orchestrates knowledge across memory tiers, model selection and resource allocation, and verification and policy enforcement. Like the human brain switching between fast intuition and slow deliberation, the FMOS learns when to intervene and when to let inference proceed directly and continuously adapting its policies based on operational experience.
Foundation models, including large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used for transportation management center (TMC) tasks such as anomaly detection, incident reporting, and traveler information. Deploying multiple such models across TMC functions raises a portfolio question: which model should serve each function, in which deployment mode, and under what shared hardware budget? We formulate this as the Foundation Model Deployment Portfolio (FMDP) problem, a mixed-integer program minimizing total cost of ownership (TCO) subject to per-function quality, latency, and safety constraints over shared GPU capacity. We prove the problem NP-hard by reduction from the 0-1 knapsack problem and propose a polynomial-time greedy heuristic. In an illustrative case study with five TMC functions and 19 candidate (model, mode) pairs, FMDP identifies a mixed portfolio costing $34/mo (97% below the cheapest feasible all-closed-API baseline) by routing four functions to open-source APIs and the one function whose quality floor no open-source model meets to a closed API. Break-even analysis shows that on-premise GPU investment becomes reasonable only above approximately 309 vision queries/hour or if API prices double.
We are entering a new era of composite model architectures that integrate diverse components such as vision encoders, language backbones, diffusion and flow heads, audio codecs, action generators, and world-model predictors. Such architectures underpin a broad class of multimodal models, including unified multimodal models, omni models, speech-language models, vision-language-action policies, and world models. However, existing model serving frameworks were built on narrow assumptions about model structure, making them ill-suited to accommodate this new architectural diversity. Here we present M*, a universal serving system for efficient serving of composite AI models. M* represents models as dataflow graphs, processing requests spanning diverse modalities and tasks as traversals over these graphs. The core insight is a modular abstraction that supports arbitrary composition of model components, flexible placement onto a physical cluster, and model-agnostic optimizations within a distributed runtime. We call this abstraction the Walk Graph and show how it can concisely capture composite models from a broad range of families. We instantiate M* on representative models and find that it achieves, on average, 20% lower end-to-end latency than vLLM-Omni for text-to-image workloads on BAGEL, while delivering up to 2.9x lower real-time factor and 2.7x higher throughput for text-to-speech workloads on Qwen3-Omni. M* also outperforms the V-JEPA 2-AC rollout baseline for robotic planning by up to 12.5x. Thus, our work paves the road towards more efficient serving of complex models with minimal developer effort.