Free-Placement Optimization of Ground Station Locations for Low-Earth Orbit Satellites

Satellite constellation design requires optimizing orbital parameters across multiple satellites to maximize mission specific metrics. For many types of mission, it is desirable to maximize coverage and minimize revisit gaps over ground targets. Existing approaches to constellation design either restrict the design space to symmetric parametric families such as Walker constellations, or rely on metaheuristic methods that require significant compute and many iterations. Gradient-based optimization has been considered intractable due to the non-differentiability of coverage and revisit metrics, which involve binary visibility indicators and discrete max operations. We introduce four continuous relaxations: soft sigmoid visibility, noisy-OR multi-satellite aggregation, leaky integrator revisit gap tracking, and LogSumExp soft-maximum, which when composed with the $\partial$SGP4 differentiable orbit propagator, yield a fully differentiable pipeline from orbital elements to mission-level objectives. We show that this scheme can recover Walker-Delta geometry from irregular initializations, and discovers elliptical Molniya-like orbits with apogee dwell over extreme latitudes from only gradients. Compared to simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithm (GA), and differential evolution (DE) baselines, our gradient-based method recovers Walker-equivalent geometry within ${\sim}750$ evaluations, whereas the three black-box baselines plateau at with significantly worse revisit even with roughly four times the evaluation budget.

Optimal wireless transmitter placement is a central task in radio-network planning, and exhaustive search becomes prohibitively expensive at scale. This paper studies the single-transmitter setting under a learned propagation model, enabling exhaustive per-pixel assessment at scale in a regime where measurement-based labeling is infeasible and ray-tracing-based labeling is computationally out of reach. We introduce a dataset of 167525 urban scenarios (RadioMapSeer-Deployment) with dual ground-truth labels for coverage-optimal and power-optimal transmitter locations. Benchmark analysis reveals an asymmetric coverage-power trade-off: coverage-optimal placement sacrifices 13.86% of received-power, whereas power-optimal placement sacrifices 5.50% of coverage; the best balanced placement lies at $\bar{d}=2.60$ from the ideal point (100%,100%). We evaluate two learning formulations: indirect heatmap-based models predicting received-power radio maps, and direct score-map models predicting the objective landscape over feasible transmitter locations. Within the heatmap family, discriminative models deliver one-shot predictions 1350-2400$\times$ faster than exhaustive search, while diffusion models additionally support multi-sample inference that improves single-objective performance and, by reusing the same sample pool under a balanced criterion, recovers strong balanced placements without explicit multi-objective training. Dual score-map strategies combining power and coverage score-maps match the exhaustive balanced optimum ($\bar{d}=2.60$) and remain close to it across smaller candidate budgets, at 14-22$\times$ speedups including the cost of evaluating shortlisted candidates. Dual score-map methods are strongest overall, whereas heatmap formulations remain attractive for their physically meaningful intermediate maps and, in the diffusion setting, for inference-time search.

In this paper, we propose a dueling double deep Q-network (DDQN)-based adaptive multi-objective handover framework for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks. The proposed method enables dynamic trade-off learning among throughput, blocking probability, and switching cost under time-varying network conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms conventional baselines, achieving up to 10.3% throughput improvement and near-zero blocking under typical operating conditions.