ZiMPedance: Impedance-Aware ZMP Modeling and Control for Payload Carrying with Quadruped Robots
Authors: Giovanni B. Dessy, Lorenzo Amatucci, Victor Barasuol, Claudio Semini
Abstract
Load transportation with quadruped robots is strongly affected by the dynamics of the physical interface between the robot and the load. Passive spring-based arms reduce weight and complexity compared to active manipulators, but their spring-damper dynamics can introduce oscillatory forces that degrade locomotion stability. This paper derives an extended Zero Moment Point (ZMP) formulation that includes passive payload-interface dynamics, relating stiffness, damping, and payload mass to the stability margin. The analysis shows that underdamped configurations can resonate with locomotion harmonics. Based on this insight, we augment a Single Rigid Body Dynamics model with passive subsystem dynamics and integrate it into a Model Predictive Control framework. In simulation, the proposed controller reduces stability violations by up to 10×, from 7.0% to 0.7%, and increase locomotion efficiency by lowering horizontal ground reaction force effort by up to 15% compared to a nominal baseline. Hardware experiments with a 2kg payload show stable locomotion under pull-release disturbances where the nominal controller fails. The same model also enables end-effector tracking through passive arm dynamics without direct arm actuation.
Passive mechanical interfaces offer a lightweight alternative to actuated manipulators for quadruped payload carrying, but their impedance directly couples the payload dynamics with the locomotion pattern. This paper analyzes how passive-arm stiffness-damping selection affects payload-carrying locomotion under different gait and payload conditions. We compare damped and underdamped passive-arm impedance configurations in simulation during flat-ground locomotion. For crawl gaits, where the support polygon remains well defined, the results show that underdamped impedance increases passive-joint oscillations and can reduce the ZMP margin with respect to the support polygon. Trot is retained as a dynamic excitation case for the passive arm, but it is not used for direct ZMP-margin stability comparison. The results are summarized in gait-payload-stiffness-damping maps, where ZMP-margin reduction is evaluated for crawl gaits and trot is retained only as a passive-arm excitation case.
Giovanni B. Dessy, Claudio Semini, Victor Barasuol
This paper presents a hierarchical control framework using model predictive control (MPC) and reinforcement learning (RL) for active roll control to manage lateral load transfer during autonomous racing of a wheeled quadruped. The framework integrates offline time-optimal raceline generation, an online MPC planner that actively minimizes the lateral Load Transfer Ratio (LTR), and a low-level, whole-body RL policy deployed directly onto the robot's 16 actuators. The MPC is based on a vehicle dynamics bicycle model of the Unitree Go2-W platform. The robot's leg actuators act as active suspension where knee joints generate anti-roll torque to bank into turns. Physical track experiments demonstrate that active roll control reduces mean LTR by up to 44%, improves the fastest lap time by 8.7%, and boosts peak lateral acceleration capability by 21.3% to 1.98 m/s2, maintaining robust high-speed stability beyond the range of a non-tilting baseline controller. Supplementary code and video can be found at https://github.com/meisman-ucb/go2w-roll-control-mpc
LIPM is everywhere in legged-locomotion control, but almost always as a modeling choice rather than as something the controller's cost actually prefers. This note tries to make that link more explicit. Working from a small centroidal OCP that penalizes the rate of angular momentum, we look at what its optimum tends to look like. Three things come out. With full-rank stance, the optimum drifts toward a pendular force pattern at a rate determined by the SVD of the moment Jacobian; the constant is set by foot-span geometry and matches the experiments to within 16%. With N=2 stance, as in trot, the friction cone introduces a lower bound on ∥H˙G∥ that no amount of weight tuning fixes; we also see a non-smooth feasibility kink at a critical horizontal acceleration that we can write in closed form. Adding a task term that asks for a nonzero H˙G moves the optimum off the pendular set in a predictable way. None of this is far from the classical ZMP/DCM picture. We test these claims on a point-mass quadruped and on the Unitree Go1 in MuJoCo (open-loop QP and a torque-level closed-loop controller), and we note where the asymptotic story stops being a good description of what the closed loop actually does.