From Celebrities to Anyone: Characterizing AI Nudification Content, Technology, and Community Dynamics on 4chan

Generative AI systems increasingly enable the production of highly realistic synthetic media. Civitai, a popular community-driven platform for AI-generated content, operates a monetized feature called Bounties, which allows users to commission the generation of content in exchange for payment. To examine how this mechanism is used and what content it incentivizes, we conduct a longitudinal analysis of all publicly available bounty requests collected over a 14-month period following the platform's launch. We find that the bounty marketplace is dominated by tools that let users steer AI models toward content they were not trained to generate. At the same time, requests for content that is "Not Safe For Work" are widespread and have increased steadily over time, now comprising a majority of all bounties. Participation in bounty creation is uneven, with 20% of requesters accounting for roughly half of requests. Requests for "deepfake" - media depicting identifiable real individuals - exhibit a higher concentration than other types of bounties. A nontrivial subset of these requests involves explicit deepfakes despite platform policies prohibiting such content. These bounties disproportionately target female celebrities, revealing a pronounced gender asymmetry in social harm. Together, these findings show how monetized, community-driven generative AI platforms can produce gendered harms, raising questions about consent, governance, and enforcement.

Despite the impressive generative capabilities of text-to-image diffusion models, they remain vulnerable to implicit sexual prompts, where subtle cues disguised as benign terms or adversarial tokens unexpectedly generate the inappropriate content due to model biases or latent correlations in training data. Existing safety mechanisms face fundamental limitations: detection methods primarily identify explicit content and fail to capture implicit malicious intent, while mitigation approaches rely on static negative prompts inadequate for diverse implicit scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose UniNDM, a unified noise-driven framework that rethinks safety mechanisms through the lens of noise dynamics in diffusion processes. Our key insight is that early-stage predicted noise exhibits inherent separability between normal and sexually explicit content, which we theoretically demonstrates quadratically increasing semantic concentration with timestep. Leveraging this property, we develop a lightweight noise-based detector achieving superior accuracy with virtually no computational overhead. For mitigation, we introduce noise-enhanced adaptive negative guidance: dynamically generating context-specific negative prompts via large language models to handle diverse implicit content, while optimizing initial noise by suppressing attention concentration on explicit tokens to provide comprehensive protection. Besides the U-Net-based diffusion models, we further extend our framework to emerging Diffusion Transformer architectures through region-constrained semantic guidance tailored for their unified multimodal attention. Comprehensive experiments across U-Net models and DiT models on both natural and adversarial datasets demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods, including SLD, UCE, Safree, etc. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Aries-iai/UniNDM.

State-of-the-art toxicity detectors for text-to-image generation adopt a one-size-fits-all approach: a single universal model applying fixed safety guidelines to all users. Our empirical evidence shows that these detectors fail to shield marginalized communities: approximately 35% of generated images labeled safe are considered harmful by disability communities. In this position paper, we argue for community-specific toxicity detection (CTD). To demonstrate its feasibility, we collaborate with disability experts to develop safety guidelines for two communities: dwarfism and blind/low vision. Using a dataset of 2,400 annotated T2I-generated images we demonstrate that both large vision-language models and existing general-purpose toxicity detectors catastrophically fail to recognize harmful content under these guidelines in zero-shot settings with F1 score lower than random guessing (F1 0.32 and 0.37). Promisingly, prompt-based adaptation methods (ICL, VQA) substantially improve harm detection performance (GPT-4o: F1 0.50 and 0.78), while parameter-efficient fine-tuning improves smaller models (0.5b-7b with best F1 0.48 and 0.59) with less than 100 demonstrations, but remains sensitive to evolving guidelines. Despite these gains, CTD performance remains far below F1 $\approx 0.9$ achieved for general-purpose toxicity detection, highlighting the challenge and the need for sustained research effort.