Uncertainty Estimation in Pathology Foundation Models via Deep Mutual Learning

Pathology foundation models (PFMs) have transformed computational pathology through powerful representation learning from histopathological images. PFMs provide rich, discriminative representations for whole slide image (WSI) analysis, enabling tasks such as slide-level classification under multiple instance learning (MIL). However, these representations may also encode non-biological signals associated with acquisition centers, potentially introducing spurious shortcuts into downstream predictions. In this work, we evaluate center-associated robustness in WSI classification using a controlled training setting with increasing class-center correlations quantified by Cramér's V. We benchmark six PFMs across four datasets and two MIL aggregators, while evaluating ComBat as a robustification strategy. We further introduce the Area Under the Cramér's V Curve (AUCC) to jointly capture absolute classification performance and its degradation as spurious correlation increases. Results show that center-related information encoded by PFMs propagates to WSI-level predictions, with robustness depending on both the PFM representation and MIL aggregation strategy. Additionally, ComBat harmonization does not provide consistent robustness gains across datasets.

Foundation models (FMs) have emerged as powerful representation extractors for medical data, yet their generalizability to datasets under distribution shift remains underexplored. This work systematically evaluates FM-based representations on a suite of computational pathology tasks across two real-world commercial cohorts, IH-BC and IH-NSCLC, drawn from the licensed in-house (IH) oncology dataset. The analysis focuses on two modalities, whole-slide images and transcriptomic profiles, drawn from the IH multimodal data. We first benchmark unimodal probing performance across five FMs on eight downstream classification tasks, and find that image and omics representations carry complementary predictive signals. Then we investigate whether multimodal fusion can yield additional gains over unimodal baselines by comparing three image-omics fusion strategies built on paired representations. The trustworthiness of selected unimodal and multimodal pipelines is further assessed through conformal prediction. Our results show that FM representations achieve competitive performance on out-of-distribution data and that multimodal fusion helps mainly when no single modality dominates the signal. Conformal prediction reveals that in the majority of cases where a point prediction fails, the true diagnosis remains recoverable within the prediction set, reinforcing the value of uncertainty-aware inference for clinical support.

Pathology foundation models (FMs) produce powerful tile-level representations which remain sensitive to scanner and staining variability, undermining deployment across laboratories. We develop a novel fine-tuning recipe that improves the robustness of pathology FMs to acquisition factors. Applied to ten different FMs, our fine-tuning strategy consistently improves robustness for every model as well as downstream performance, with no observed trade-off. On average, it raises the PathoROB robustness index by 23% (from 0.72 to 0.87) and increases the overall cross-benchmark performance by 43% on Patho-Bench, HEST and THUNDER combined, with individual gains reaching up to 72% in robustness (Phikon-v2) and 76% in performance (Midnight-12k). We publicly release the fine-tuned versions of Phikon-v2 (Phaet) and Midnight-12k (Mascaret) at https://huggingface.co/wearewaiv/models.