A Synthetic-Driven Vision System for Assembly Step Recognition

Assembling objects from parts requires understanding multimodal instructions, linking them to 3D components, and predicting physically plausible 6-DoF motions for each assembly step. Existing datasets focus on simplified scenarios, overlooking shape complexities and assembly trajectories in industrial assemblies. We introduce AssemblyBench, a synthetic dataset of 2,789 industrial objects with multimodal instruction manuals, corresponding 3D part models, and part assembly trajectories. We also propose a transformer-based model, AssemblyDyno, which uses the instructional manual and the 3D shape of each part to jointly predict assembly order and part assembly trajectories. AssemblyDyno outperforms prior works in both assembly pose estimation and trajectory feasibility, where the latter is evaluated by our physics-based simulations.

Industrial visual inspection systems often suffer from a severe scarcity of labeled defect data, particularly during the early stages of New Product Introduction (NPI). This limitation hinders the deployment of robust supervised detectors precisely when automated quality control is most needed. We present an end-to-end generative framework for high-fidelity, few-shot defect synthesis that enables both in-domain augmentation and cross-domain transfer. Our approach disentangles defect morphology from background appearance by combining masked textual inversion for defect representation learning, noise-blended conditioned generation for surface-aware synthesis, and gradient-aware post-processing for seamless visual integration. We evaluate the framework in two practically relevant settings: few-shot data augmentation, where synthetic samples enrich a small set of real defects, and zero-shot adaptation, where defects learned from a source domain are transferred to a novel target surface without any real target-domain defect examples. Using RF-DETR as the downstream detector, we show that the proposed pipeline substantially narrows the domain gap on a private industrial dataset. In the few-shot setting, synthetic augmentation improves mAP from 78.8% to 83.3%. In the zero-shot setting, synthetic domain adaptation improves mAP from 65.0% to 85.1%. These results demonstrate that high-fidelity defect synthesis can meaningfully accelerate NPI by enabling effective inspection models before sufficient real defect data has been collected.

Industrial visual sim-to-real is often described as transferring from synthetic images to real images, but industrial deployment usually involves a broader mismatch between available evidence and required decisions. A system may be built from CAD renderings, simulated RGB-D observations, normal reference images, synthetic defects, pretrained feature spaces, or language prompts, yet deployed under different sensors, lighting, materials, fixtures, calibration, production variation, and rare defect modes. This review reframes industrial visual sim-to-real as a domain-gap problem organized by prior availability. We distinguish CAD-available settings, where explicit object geometry can support rendering, calibration, pose estimation, segmentation, and test-time geometric verification; CAD-unavailable settings, where geometry is replaced by normal-reference appearance, feature distributions, teacher-student residuals, synthetic anomaly assumptions, foundation features, or vision-language priors; and boundary-prior settings, where approximate models, templates, reference views, or semantic correspondences preserve only part of the CAD role. This framing connects CAD-based detection and 6D pose-estimation literature with industrial anomaly and surface-inspection literature that is usually reviewed separately. To make the taxonomy concrete, we use empirical anchors on T-LESS/BOP, MVTec AD, and VisA. The anchors show that CAD render count alone does not close transfer; source-distribution design, detector capacity, and small real calibration can matter more. They also show that CAD at test time creates a distinct verification channel through mask, pose, and depth consistency, whereas CAD-unavailable inspection relies on calibrated normality and feature deviation. The review therefore argues against a single cross-task leaderboard and instead asks what prior grounds the deployment decision.