cs.LGJul 7, 2026

K-ABENA: K-Adaptive Backpropagation with Error-based N-exclusion Algorithm : (Compensated Loss-Based Sample Exclusion with Unbiased Gradient Estimation)

Authors: Jean-Francois Bonbhel

Abstract

We present K-ABENA (K-Adaptive Backpropagation with Error-based N-exclusion Algorithm), a selective gradient computation framework that reduces per-iteration training cost by excluding a fraction of low-loss ("minor") observations from the backward pass. Its canonical form (v3) combines a defensive-mixture sampling design over the minor set with Horvitz-Thompson inverse-probability reweighting, yielding a design-unbiased Horvitz-Thompson gradient estimator (Lemma 2) and whose self-normalized practical variant carries a bias of order O(1/m) with an explicit constant (Lemma 3). We prove an O(1/sqrt(T)) non-convex convergence guarantee for SGD under the estimator, with an additive term that quantifies the residual bias (Theorem 1). We further prove that uncompensated loss-based selection - a family that includes OHEM, SBP, and the two earlier K-ABENA variants - admits no stationary point at any minimizer where its selection bias is bounded away from zero (Proposition 2), and we quantify this failure empirically: at 0.17% class imbalance, uncompensated variants reach test AUC 0.53-0.62 versus 0.9998 for full-batch SGD, while the compensated estimator attains 0.9991 at identical 28.4% compute savings. On real datasets (Breast Cancer, Digits, Wine, Diabetes) the compensated estimator is statistically indistinguishable from full-batch SGD (paired permutation tests, p >= 0.5; Section 7) while saving 28-54% of per-epoch gradient computation. A biased "regularized mode" (the earlier half-domain variant) is retained as an option with a proven exact bias decomposition (Lemma 5) and quantified contraindications: it collapses to 0.386 accuracy under 40% label noise (baseline: 0.832) and to 0.53 AUC under extreme imbalance. Every advantage and every limitation reported in this paper is either proved or measured; all experiments are CPU-scale (NumPy/scikit-learn) and their scope is stated explicitly.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 4, 2026math.OC

Robust and Fast Training via Per-Sample Clipping

We propose a robust gradient estimator based on per-sample gradient clipping and analyze its properties both theoretically and empirically. We show that the resulting method, per-sample clipped SGD (PS-Clip-SGD), achieves optimal in-expectation convergence rates for non-convex optimization problems under heavy-tailed gradient noise. Moreover, we establish high-probability convergence guarantees that match the in-expectation rates up to polylogarithmic factors in the failure probability. We complement our theoretical results with multiple numerical experiments. In particular, we demonstrate that PS-Clip-SGD outperforms both vanilla SGD with momentum and standard gradient clipping when training AlexNet on the CIFAR-100 dataset, even after accounting for the additional computational time caused by per-sample clipping. We also empirically show that, in the presence of gradient accumulation, applying clipping at the mini-batch level can improve training performance while incurring virtually no additional computational cost. This finding is particularly interesting, as it contradicts the common practice of applying clipping only after all accumulation steps have been completed.
Davide Nobile, Philipp Grohs
Gradient ClippingStochastic Gradient DescentConvex Optimization
AskPDF
May 19, 2026stat.ML

Increasing Missingness to Reduce Bias: Richardson-SGD with Missing Data

Stochastic gradient methods are central to modern large-scale learning, but their use with incomplete covariates remains delicate since imputation schemes generally introduce systematic gradient biases, as shown for linear models. In this work, we prove that all parametric models exhibit similar gradient bias for various imputation procedures and characterize exactly the dependence on the missingness ratio vector pp, with O(∥p∥)O(\|p\|) as the leading term. We exploit this analysis to propose a simple debiasing procedure for stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with missing values based on Richardson extrapolation, which leverages the exact expression of the gradient bias. The key idea is to \emph{deliberately add missingness}: from an already incomplete observation, we generate a further-thinned version at a higher, controlled missingness level, and combine the two resulting stochastic gradients to cancel the leading bias term. We prove that one Richardson step reduces the gradient bias from O(∥p∥)O(\|p\|) to O(∥p∥2)O(\|p\|^2) under several missingness scenarios. Our proposed method is computationally efficient, model-agnostic and applies to any parametric loss whose stochastic gradient can be computed after imputation. Furthermore, when missing indicators are independent, the population gradient bias is a multilinear polynomial in pp and depends only on population gradient errors induced by declaring a single coordinate missing. In this case, our method generalizes to a multi-step Richardson procedure which recursively cancels higher-order terms. Empirically, Richardson debiasing improves optimization and estimation across several generalized linear models and combines positively with widely used imputation procedures such as MICE. These results suggest that, somewhat counter-intuitively, adding controlled missingness on top of existing missing data can make stochastic learning from incomplete data more accurate.
Ferdinand Genans, Erwan Scornet
Missing DataImputationStochastic Gradient DescentBias MitigationCovariate ShiftGradient Concentration+2
AskPDF
Sep 14, 2026cs.LG

Quantile-based Loss Filtering for Outlier-Robust Stochastic Gradient Descent

We study loss-based filtering for finite-sum optimization with a subset of corrupted component functions whose gradients may be highly unreliable. Motivated by minimum-loss-based SGD (min-kk-loss) and quantile-based methods for corrupted linear systems, we propose and analyze a general loss-filtering framework -- Quantile-kk-Loss SGD (QkkL-SGD) -- that samples kk component losses at each iteration and updates using an index chosen uniformly from the lower empirical qq-quantile. We prove linear convergence of this family of methods under standard convexity assumptions, requiring the sample size to scale with the number of corruptions and a subset strong-convexity threshold. For the cases when large enough sampling is impossible or undesirable, we give a complementary small-sample probabilistic analysis that covers any sample size kk and the convergence behavior depends on the probability of selecting an outlier and on the curvature of the selected good step. Experiments on polynomial regression, regularized logistic regression, and regularized hinge loss show that intermediate quantiles often outperform both standard SGD and min-kk-loss SGD. In particular, min-kk often stalls by repeatedly selecting nearly solved components, while intermediate quantiles retain robustness and produce more informative updates.
Jamie Haddock, Anna Ma, Elizaveta Rebrova
Stochastic Gradient DescentQuantile RegressionGradient DescentConvex SetsDiscrete-Time Linear Systems
AskPDF