Poisoning attacks against public datasets lead to major concerns, such as (i) misclassification of perceived objects when the poisoned data is used for training and (ii) embedding of backdoors that may eventually be triggered later on, when specific conditions in the system apply over the learned models. Its impact over data augmentation models is unclear. While data augmentation reduces the likelihood of poisoning attack success, some valid questions remain. Is data augmentation affecting the impact of poisoning attacks? can it increase the number of poisoned samples or injected backdoors? We explore in this paper some of these questions. We assess the effects of augmenting poisoned 3D point cloud datasets and validate that poisoning is able to evade the sanitizing nature of augmentation techniques when using the concrete case of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) techniques to exemplify the case of data augmentation processing. We also validate that poisoning propagates over the augmented datasets and perturbs the decision made by general-purpose classifiers, in the end. All the experimental material (including tools, datasets, and classifiers) is publicly available, to facilitate reproducibility and to foster further research in the topic.
The advent of deep neural networks has led to remarkable progress in 3D point cloud recognition, but they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Although various defense methods have been studied, they suffer from a trade-off between robustness and transferability. We propose Adversarial Point Counterattack (APC) to achieve both simultaneously. APC is a lightweight input-level purification module that generates instance-specific counter-perturbations for each point, effectively neutralizing attacks. Leveraging clean-adversarial pairs, APC enforces geometric consistency in data space and semantic consistency in feature space. To improve generalizability across diverse attacks, we adopt a hybrid training strategy using adversarial point clouds from multiple attack types. Since APC operates purely on input point clouds, it directly transfers to unseen models and defends against attacks targeting them without retraining. At inference, a single APC forward pass provides purified point clouds with negligible time and parameter overhead. Extensive experiments on two 3D recognition benchmarks demonstrate that the APC achieves state-of-the-art defense performance. Furthermore, cross-model evaluations validate its superior transferability. The code is available at https://github.com/gyjung975/APC.
Despite extensive progress in point cloud robustness, existing methods primarily rely on augmentation strategies or defense mechanisms while overlooking the geometric nature of adversarial fragility. We hypothesize that adversarial vulnerability in 3D networks arises from a manifold misalignment between the latent geometry learned by the model and the intrinsic geometry of the underlying surface. Small, geometry-preserving perturbations along the input manifold often induce disproportionate distortions in feature space, potentially leading to misclassifications. We formalize this phenomenon by developing a geometric interpretation of 3D robustness that links classical adversarial theory to the intrinsic structure of point clouds. Motivated by this analysis, we introduce Manifold-Aligned Point Recognition (MAPR), a framework that regularizes the latent geometry by aligning predictions across intrinsic perturbations. MAPR augments each point cloud with intrinsic features capturing local curvature and diffusion structure, and applies a consistency loss that preserves invariance to intrinsic, geometry-preserving perturbations. Without relying on adversarial training or additional data, MAPR consistently improves robustness under multiple adversarial attacks across several datasets, achieving average robustness gains of +20.02 and +8.83 percentage points over vanilla models on ModelNet40 and ScanObjectNN, respectively.
Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.