Reconfigurable Radiology Labels Without Relabeling

Automatic report labeling facilitates the identification of clinical findings from unstructured text and enables large-scale annotation for medical imaging research. Existing rule-based labelers struggle with the diverse descriptions in clinical reports, while fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs) requires large amounts of labeled data that are often unavailable in clinical settings. In this paper, we propose PromptRad, a knowledge-enhanced multi-label \textbf{prompt}-tuning approach for \textbf{rad}iology report labeling under low-resource settings. PromptRad reformulates multi-label classification as masked language modeling and incorporates synonyms from the UMLS Metathesaurus into a multi-word verbalizer to enrich category representations. By fine-tuning the PLM without additional classification layers, PromptRad requires substantially less labeled data than conventional fine-tuning. Experiments on liver CT (computed tomography) reports show that PromptRad outperforms dictionary-based and fine-tuning baselines with only 32 labeled training examples, and achieves competitive performance with GPT-4 despite using a much smaller model. Further analysis demonstrates that PromptRad captures complex negation patterns more effectively than existing methods, making it a promising solution for report labeling in data-scarce clinical scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/ila-lab/PromptRad.

Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation is hindered by the long-tailed distribution of pathologies and the open-world nature of clinical environments. Existing benchmarks often rely on closed-set classes from a single institution, failing to capture the prevalence of rare diseases or the appearance of novel findings. To address this, we present the CXR-LT challenge. The first event, CXR-LT 2023, established a large-scale benchmark for long-tailed multi-label CXR classification and identified key challenges in rare disease recognition. CXR-LT 2024 further expanded the label space and introduced a zero-shot task to study generalization to unseen findings. Building on the success of CXR-LT 2023 and 2024, this third iteration of the benchmark introduces a multi-center dataset comprising over 145,000 images from PadChest and NIH Chest X-ray datasets. Additionally, all development and test sets in CXR-LT 2026 are annotated by radiologists, providing a more reliable and clinically grounded evaluation than report-derived labels. The challenge defines two core tasks this year: (1) Robust Multi-Label Classification on 30 known classes and (2) Open-World Generalization to 6 unseen (out-of-distribution) rare disease classes. This paper summarizes the overview of the CXR-LT 2026 challenge. We describe the data collection and annotation procedures, analyze solution strategies adopted by participating teams, and evaluate head-versus-tail performance, calibration, and cross-center generalization gaps. Our results show that vision-language foundation models improve both in-distribution and zero-shot performance, but detecting rare findings under multi-center shift remains challenging. Our study provides a foundation for developing and evaluating AI systems in realistic long-tailed and open-world clinical conditions.

Chest X-ray (CXR) radiology report generation (RRG) models have shown rapid progress on automated metrics, yet their clinical utility remains uncertain due to limited qualitative evaluation by radiologists. We present CXRMate-2, a state-of-the-art CXR RRG model that enables tractable reinforcement learning (RL) through structured multimodal temporal embeddings and high-resolution visual feature compression, for efficient, unified conditioning of an LLM decoder on visual, textual, and temporal context from a study and its prior. This enables group relative policy optimisation (GRPO), where a proposed reward function is used to improve semantic alignment with radiologist reports. Across the MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert Plus, and ReXgradient datasets, CXRMate-2 achieves statistically significant improvements over strong benchmarks, including gains of 11.2% and 24.4% in GREEN and RadGraph-XL, respectively, on MIMIC-CXR relative to MedGemma 1.5 (4B). To directly compare CXRMate-2 against radiologist reporting, we conduct a blinded, randomised qualitative retrospective evaluation. Three consultant radiologists compare generated and radiologist reports across 120 studies from the MIMIC-CXR test set. Generated reports were deemed acceptable (defined as preferred or rated equally to radiologist reports) in 45% of ratings, with no statistically significant difference in preference rates for seven of the eight analysed findings. Preferences for radiologist reports were driven primarily by higher recall, while generated reports were consistently preferred for readability. Together, these results define a clear pathway to clinically acceptable CXR RRG. Improving recall and the detection of subtle findings represents the primary remaining barrier to non-inferiority with radiologist reporting, positioning CXR RRG for prospective evaluation in assistive, radiologist-led workflows.