Seeing What Matters: Lesion-Aware High-Resolution Patch Discovery and Fusion for Chest X-ray Report Generation

The evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) for chest X-ray (CXR) analysis has largely been limited to disease-presence classification without visual grounding. Such evaluations fail to verify the expert-level lesion perception necessary to ensure the clinical reliability of VLMs. To address these limitations, we introduce CheXpercept, a sequential, multi-level perception benchmark that mirrors a radiologist's cognitive workflow across coarse-level detection, fine-level contour evaluation and revision, and semantic-level attribute extraction. To ensure high clinical fidelity at scale, we construct the dataset using a semi-automated generation pipeline paired with a review by six medical experts. CheXpercept contains 10,400 QA items derived from 2,100 CXRs, covering seven clinically critical pulmonary and cardiac lesions. To demonstrate the current landscape of VLM perception, we benchmark 14 general and medical VLMs on CheXpercept. The models achieve adequate performance only at the coarse level, with accuracy degrading precipitously on deeper visual tasks. Notably, medical VLMs show almost no perceptual advantage over their general-domain counterparts, highlighting a systemic flaw in current domain adaptation. The code and dataset will be publicly available.

A clinically useful chest X-ray system must go beyond fluent report generation: it should classify findings with tunable decision thresholds, localize them spatially, and derive the anatomical measurements upon which many diagnoses depend. Today's Vision-Language Models (VLMs) treat these as separate problems, if they address them at all, leaving a gap between what radiologists need and what generative models provide. We introduce CARE-X, a chest X-ray VLM that narrows this gap by unifying auxiliary discriminative supervision with reward-aligned generation. CARE-X augments its generative backbone with focal-loss classification and composite-loss grounding heads, co-trained alongside the language-modeling objective. This auxiliary supervision produces discriminative diagnostic predictions with tunable decision thresholds and precise spatial localization while also improving report quality, providing evidence that structured prediction and generation reinforce one another. Building on this foundation, Decoupled Clip and Dynamic Sampling Policy Optimization (DAPO) leverages task-specific reward signals for report generation, visual question answering (VQA), and spatial grounding, directly optimizing the clinical quality metrics that matter in practice. The result is state-of-the-art performance on the majority of metrics across four report-generation benchmarks, 94.0% VQA accuracy on ReXVQA (+6.0 pp over the next-best baseline), and generative spatial decoding that reaches near parity with dedicated detection heads. Separately, to address measurement-dependent diagnoses, we couple Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct with native tool-calling capabilities for invoking deterministic measurement tools, while retaining full visual access to the image. This hybrid inference yields +43.6 pp average F1 over perception-only baselines across five measurement-dependent conditions.

Chest X-ray (CXR) radiology report generation (RRG) models have shown rapid progress on automated metrics, yet their clinical utility remains uncertain due to limited qualitative evaluation by radiologists. We present CXRMate-2, a state-of-the-art CXR RRG model that enables tractable reinforcement learning (RL) through structured multimodal temporal embeddings and high-resolution visual feature compression, for efficient, unified conditioning of an LLM decoder on visual, textual, and temporal context from a study and its prior. This enables group relative policy optimisation (GRPO), where a proposed reward function is used to improve semantic alignment with radiologist reports. Across the MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert Plus, and ReXgradient datasets, CXRMate-2 achieves statistically significant improvements over strong benchmarks, including gains of 11.2% and 24.4% in GREEN and RadGraph-XL, respectively, on MIMIC-CXR relative to MedGemma 1.5 (4B). To directly compare CXRMate-2 against radiologist reporting, we conduct a blinded, randomised qualitative retrospective evaluation. Three consultant radiologists compare generated and radiologist reports across 120 studies from the MIMIC-CXR test set. Generated reports were deemed acceptable (defined as preferred or rated equally to radiologist reports) in 45% of ratings, with no statistically significant difference in preference rates for seven of the eight analysed findings. Preferences for radiologist reports were driven primarily by higher recall, while generated reports were consistently preferred for readability. Together, these results define a clear pathway to clinically acceptable CXR RRG. Improving recall and the detection of subtle findings represents the primary remaining barrier to non-inferiority with radiologist reporting, positioning CXR RRG for prospective evaluation in assistive, radiologist-led workflows.