World-Model-Aware Responsibility Allocation in Heterogeneous Logistics Systems

Latent world models underpin much of modern model-based control, yet current action-conditioned formulations supervise the next-latent transition with a single, undifferentiated target, forcing a monolithic learning signal to absorb every source of state change. In real world, however, transitions arise from two heterogeneous sources: an action-driven component induced by the agent, and an action-invariant world effect -- the change that would still occur under a null action, dictated by the environment's intrinsic dynamics (e.g., gravity-driven sliding, inertia, contact rebound, and persistent drift). Fusing them into a single target entangles the two inside the latent transition, prevents the model from attributing observed changes to their underlying causes, and undermines the transferability of the learned dynamics. We introduce DWM (Decomposed World Model), a supervision-level framework that operationalizes this decomposition. DWM augments the predictor of a latent world model with an auxiliary world head, regularized by a normalized world-contrastive objective to be action-invariant, while the original pred head is coupled to it via an orthogonality constraint; together, the two signals induce an explicit additive decomposition of the predicted transition into an action-invariant and a complementary action-driven component, without altering the underlying architecture or inference pipeline. To evaluate DWM under persistent world effects, we construct W-variants of three standard control benchmarks -- PushT-W, Reacher-W, and TwoRoom-W -- each instantiating a distinct action-invariant dynamic. DWM matches strong baselines on the flat counterparts and delivers a mean absolute improvement of 13.1% in CEM planning success across the W-variants.

World models let agents plan against predicted physical state, but that state drifts; re-observation is costly and delayed, and repair can fail. We present TRACE-RealWorld (TRW), to our knowledge the first commitment-level consistency contract for world models. TRW treats predicted state as a materialized view and a physical commitment as a read whose authorization can expire. Typed, calibrated claims specify consequence-conditioned freshness and priced verification. Adaptive refresh generalizes dual-Kalman synchronization to consult the world when evidence could change a decision; dependency-scoped SagaLLM compensation repairs reversible commitments invalidated after authorization. Under an event-aligned risk oracle and recovery-liveness assumptions, we prove that synchronization and compensation are insufficient alone, whereas their composition gives a conditional consistency guarantee. Otherwise, the argument yields an auditable decomposition of violations into named debts. We implement TRW in Flood-SAR, a search-and-rescue simulator over real geography, and test six preregistered questions at frozen operating points on held-out seeds. Adaptive refresh reduces stale execution but does not dominate fixed refresh on cost, coverage, or rescue outcomes. Localized repair reduces repair work by 9.56 units per mission and restoration latency by 80.7 seconds relative to global recovery; the observed residual-violation difference is zero without establishing equivalence. Detection coverage is 0.83-0.89, and 10 of 97 invoked restorations are incomplete by mission end. The campaign treats empirical slack as sensitivity inputs rather than discharging the theorem's assumptions or providing a simultaneous population certificate. Exact replay reconstructs a disputed dispatch. TRW thus makes a world model an auditable predictive interface rather than a self-validating source of truth.

World models have progressed from compact latent dynamics to generative, controllable, and interactive simulators of embodied environments. However, high predictive likelihood and visual fidelity do not necessarily ensure that a model preserves the evidence required for safe decision-making. This perspective identifies three structural mismatches in current world modeling: likelihood versus risk, prediction versus intervention, and finite-horizon prediction versus accumulated consequences. We propose the Risk-Informed World Model (RIWM) as a decision-centric research direction for safety-critical embodied systems. RIWM organizes world modeling around consequences, intervention, epistemic uncertainty, and recoverability, and integrates four interdependent capabilities: decision-relevant representation, counterfactual reasoning, safety-critical episodic memory, and runtime safety assurance. It distinguishes physical, social, and operational consequences while using epistemic uncertainty to qualify the evidence supporting action. We further discuss open challenges in identifying consequential futures, validating counterfactual reasoning, maintaining revisable safety memories, translating learned consequences into executable constraints, and determining when evidence is sufficient to act. This perspective argues that future world models should move beyond predicting likely futures toward identifying which futures matter, revising judgments through experience, and recognizing when to act, revise, sense, defer, or abstain.