Safe adaptive control is online adaptation under a safety guarantee on the learning trajectory itself. The controller may use any causal, history-dependent rule and act differently across environments as data arrive. Only its safety guarantee is uniform: the same rule must satisfy it under every initially plausible model. Performance is measured against a safe oracle that knows the realized model. Many finite-time analyses assume persistent excitation of the uniformly safe closed loop, so the data distinguish every pair of models requiring different control decisions. Under that assumption, feasibility is already settled; only the rate remains. We ask instead: Do the safety constraints permit such an informative experiment at all? While an alternative remains plausible, the controller must preserve a safe continuation under it. We call the first action that forecloses such a continuation commitment. Chance safety allows commitment only on an event rare under the alternative, and the evidence must arrive beforehand: the observation generated by the committing action is too late. We define precommitment information as the KL divergence between learner-visible laws stopped before commitment. Our main result is a causal reduction. The commitment rule determines (1) the probability that safety permits commitment under the alternative, (2) the target-side cost of remaining noncommittal, (3) and the information available when the decision is made. Bounded precommitment information therefore leaves a fixed fraction of the oracle gap unavoidable. If the gap is Ω(T), every uniformly safe policy has linear regret. We establish the obstruction in a constrained linear system with quadratic regulation cost. We also prove recovery in special cases and derive semidefinite upper certificates for deterministic linear-Gaussian systems.
We study the problem of adaptive control of the stochastic linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with constraints that must be satisfied at every time step. Prior work on the multidimensional problem has shown O~(T2/3) regret and satisfaction of robust constraints, leaving open the question of whether O~(T) regret can be attained in the constrained LQR setting. We contribute to this problem by showing O~(T) regret and satisfaction of chance constraints. This type of constraints allow us to handle unbounded noise and also enable analytical techniques not directly applicable to robust constraints. Our proposed algorithm for this problem uses an SDP to select an optimistic policy, and then "scales back" this policy until it is verifiably-safe. Our theoretical analysis establishes regret and constraint guarantees via a key lemma that bounds the system covariance in terms of the chosen policy. This covariance-based analysis is in contrast with the cost-to-go based analysis that is typically used in adaptive LQR.
We augment the Slotine--Li adaptive controller for Euler--Lagrange systems with three learned components: a structured-quadratic Lyapunov function Vψ whose positive-definiteness follows from a Cholesky parameterization, a residual Soft Actor--Critic policy that adds bounded torque corrections to the analytic baseline, and a physics-informed neural network that estimates unmodeled dynamics. A closed-form safety filter, derived from the single affine constraint V˙ψ+αVψ≤0, projects every policy output onto the safe set without requiring an online QP solver. We prove: global feasibility of the filter under a drift-decay condition on the control-degeneracy set; exponential stability under exact shielding, with a robust extension whose margin depends on the PINN approximation error; almost-sure convergence of the three-timescale policy--certificate--multiplier updates to a KKT point; and a PAC generalization bound for the certificate over compacts. On a 2-DOF manipulator with nonlinear friction and variable payload, the learned certificate accounts for most of the empirical gain: tracking error drops by 41% on nominal friction and 24% on aggressive friction at the centroid of the training distribution. A 7-DOF scalability study on a Franka Emika Panda confirms clean convergence of the full pipeline at industrial scale, identifies the conditions under which gains over exact model-based baselines should and should not be expected, and documents a warm-start pathology of the learned certificate that has practical implications for deployment.
Safety in reinforcement learning is often specified through cumulative cost constraints, but these trajectory-level guarantees do not directly prevent unsafe individual decisions, especially under nonstationarity. In continual and nonstationary settings, the difficulty is amplified because the risk associated with the same action can vary across contexts, while a fixed state-level threshold may be either too conservative or too weak. We propose Constraint Projection Safety Shield (CPSS), a runtime mechanism that converts a cumulative safety budget into adaptive state-level control constraints during execution. CPSS tracks the remaining safety budget, projects it into a time-varying admissible risk threshold, and filters policy actions whose predicted safety cost exceeds the active threshold. The threshold is adjusted online using contextual signals so that enforcement becomes stricter in more demanding or rapidly changing regimes and less restrictive when the available safety budget is sufficient. We analyze the resulting shielded policy and show that the mechanism guarantees per-state threshold satisfaction for executed actions, induces finite-horizon cumulative cost bounds, and yields a performance degradation bound in terms of intervention frequency and per-step reward distortion. We evaluate CPSS in nonstationary highway merging scenarios using highway-env. Across multiple seeds, CPSS substantially reduces proximity-based safety violations and increases separation margins while intervening selectively rather than dominating the learned policy. These results support adaptive budget-to-threshold projection as a practical way to transform cumulative safety specifications into effective local safety control for continual reinforcement learning systems.