Translation as Augmentation: Effect of Translated Data on Assessment of Difficulty

When a text is translated, does the translation retain the complexity of the original? We introduce ComplexityMT, a new challenge for assessing how text complexity and machine translation interact with and influence each other, using the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) levels as the measure of text complexity. Across six languages, including Arabic, Dutch, English, French, Hindi, and Russian, we evaluate three open-weight models, one closed model, and a commercial machine translation system on two tasks: i) correlation of CEFR with translation difficulty, and ii) shifts in CEFR levels of the source texts. Our experiments show that higher CEFR levels make texts more difficult to translate, and that machine translation shifts the CEFR level of the target text compared to the original source, for most languages. These findings provide new insights for researchers and practitioners working on multilingual pedagogical content generation and machine translation difficulty estimation.

BERT models have revolutionised Natural Language Processing (NLP) through their ability to process unstructured text across diverse domains. However, developing high-quality BERT models for non-English languages remains challenging due to limited annotated data and high computational demands. Translating non-English data into English and fine-tuning existing English BERT models offers a resource-efficient alternative, yet few studies have structurally compared translation-based fine-tuning with native-language BERT performance across tasks and languages. This study provides such a comparison, evaluating the feasibility of translation-based fine-tuning across six NLP tasks: Sentiment Analysis, Hate Speech Detection, Question Answering, Named Entity Recognition, Part-of-Speech Tagging, and Natural Language Inference, using datasets translated from Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, Italian, and Russian. Across all settings, the translation-based approach was comparable or superior in 53.3 percent of cases. Gains were most frequent in Question Answering, Part-of-Speech Tagging, and Natural Language Inference, while performance declines were common in Named Entity Recognition and Hate Speech Detection. The results show that translation-based fine-tuning is most effective for tasks relying on syntactic or structural patterns and for languages typologically close to English, such as Dutch, but less effective for token-level or culturally nuanced tasks, particularly in Chinese. Overall, this study demonstrates that translation-based fine-tuning offers a scalable, resource-efficient, and empirically validated path for extending NLP to low-resource languages while advancing linguistic inclusivity and sustainability in artificial intelligence.

Most endangered languages lack the parallel data required for machine translation, despite the existence of descriptive grammar books. We introduce a pipeline that uses large language models to extract grammatical rules, example sentences, and lexicons from grammar books and generate synthetic parallel corpora for fine-tuning-rather than feeding grammar content into prompts at inference time, as in prior work. Validated on three typologically diverse low-resource languages-Kalamang (Papuan), Tuatschin (Romance), and Mandan (Siouan)-we show that fine-tuning on synthetic data improves over seed-data baselines in 75% of configurations for Kalamang and 59% for Tuatschin, with best-case ChrF++ gains of +8.8, +5.3, and +3.3 respectively. Through a systematic factorial study across 96 configurations varying target part-of-speech, retrieval granularity, and sample volume, we identify which factor combinations drive gains and where they break down. Our results demonstrate that static linguistic documentation can be repurposed for machine translation fine-tuning, offering a practical path towards translation tools for severely under-resourced languages.