Post-Operative Glioma Segmentation via Loss Stabilization, Normalization and Subspace Attention

Background: Accurate glioma subregion delineation is important for radiotherapy planning and longitudinal monitoring, but manual contour correction is time-consuming. Models such as nnU-Net may generalize imperfectly and lack clinician-directed text correction. Purpose: We investigated adapting a three-dimensional (3D) vision-language foundation model for text-guided brain tumor segmentation refinement. Methods: We developed a lightweight VoxTell-based framework. Pretrained VoxTell generated initial masks. Oracle prompts derived from segmentation errors encoded target, action, location, imaging evidence, edit size, and preservation constraints. Frozen Qwen/VoxTell prompt embeddings were injected through trainable projections into its multiscale decoder conditioning; other weights remained frozen. Training, validation, and testing used 901, 100, and 250 BraTS-GLI cases. Cross-dataset transfer was evaluated on 100 meningioma, metastasis, pediatric tumor, and UPENN-GBM cases. Results: On the internal test set using post-contrast T1-weighted input, correct instructions improved subregion Dice similarity coefficient (DSC; enhancing tumor, edema, and necrotic/non-enhancing core) from $0.774\pm0.158$ to $0.796\pm0.137$. They outperformed blank prompts ($0.762\pm0.155$; Holm-adjusted $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.71$) and contradictory prompts ($0.770\pm0.163$; $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.48$). In cross-dataset testing, correct instructions improved DSC from $0.527\pm0.287$ to $0.550\pm0.278$ and outperformed contradictory instructions ($0.504\pm0.275$; $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.43$). Conclusion: A 3D vision-language foundation model can perform instruction-guided refinement of glioma subregion segmentations. Sensitivity to correct, blank, and contradictory prompts suggests text-dependent contour editing rather than nonspecific post-processing, supporting further evaluation as a clinician-in-the-loop tool.

Glioma segmentation in multiparametric MRI is a critical component of treatment planning. A segmentation model that fails silently on treatment-critical sub-regions represents a patient safety risk that overlap-based metrics such as Dice scores cannot expose. We ask whether voxel-level uncertainty estimation via Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout can reliably identify segmentation errors in clinically critical sub-regions, and whether calibration failure modes are detectable from standard reporting metrics alone. In an empirical two-model case study on 126 BraTS21 patients, we evaluate a high-performance pretrained SegResNet and a locally trained UNet with residual units (UNet-Res). MC dropout preserved segmentation accuracy ($|Δ\text{Dice}|$ $<0.01$) while achieving strong uncertainty-error alignment (AUROC for entropy (H) $\approx$0.97), indicating uncertainty correctly ranks erroneous voxels above correct ones. Entropy-based patient stratification identified a high-uncertainty subgroup with substantially lower segmentation performance (median whole-tumour Dice $0.835$ vs. $0.925$), supporting uncertainty as a practical triage signal. However, global alignment can mask important region-specific differences. Despite similar AUROC, UNet-Res exhibited near-zero enhancing tumour entropy ($0.054$) and Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of $0.915$, with a Dice of only $0.714$, indicating severely miscalibrated confidence on the most clinically critical sub-region, a failure mode invisible to standard Dice and AUROC reporting. These findings demonstrate that strong uncertainty-error alignment is necessary but insufficient for clinical safety: sub-region-specific calibration assessment must accompany AUROC evaluation when selecting models for clinical deployment.

Existing BraTS-GLI datasets provide a widely used benchmark for adult glioma MRI segmentation, but their task definition focuses on tumor subregions and does not systematically represent coexisting white matter hyperintensities (WMH). In joint segmentation settings, such unlabeled abnormalities introduce task-specific label noise by treating pathological regions as normal tissue. To address this limitation, we introduce BraTS-GLI Anatomy-Lesion, a controlled-access, labels-only derived resource built from the BraTS 2023-GLI training cohort. The resource provides 1,251 unified eight-class anatomy-lesion label sets aligned with the original four-modal MRI cases, including image-repair labels for 116 cases requiring repaired imaging inputs. The cohort is organized into a 394-case purified subset and an 857-case extended subset, with case-level metadata covering label source, image-repair requirements, quality-control status, access conditions, checksums, and release boundaries. Compared with the original BraTS-GLI annotations, the resource substantially expands foreground supervision by incorporating healthy brain tissues and previously unlabeled coexisting abnormalities within a unified label space. A validation study using MedNeXt and T1/FLAIR inputs suggests that WMH-aware supervision preserves healthy-tissue segmentation performance across both in-domain GLI and external WMH datasets, while improving sensitivity to coexisting lesions relative to noisy-control training. The resource is intended for scientific research and supports joint anatomy-lesion supervision, label-noise analysis, and reproducible evaluation. Data are available at https://www.synapse.org/Synapse:syn75210889/wiki/, and code is available at https://github.com/xyx200/brats-gli-anatomy-lesion-code. The data resource DOI is https://doi.org/10.7303/SYN75210889.