cs.ROJul 27, 2026

FIRMGrasp: A Friction-Informed Risk Margin for Robust Grasp Synthesis

Authors: Clinton EnweremJohn S. BarasCalin Belta

Abstract

Classical grasp quality metrics assume one deterministic friction coefficient and therefore cannot assess whether a grasp maintains force closure across plausible friction values. We present FIRMGrasp, a family of grasp quality metrics that incorporates friction uncertainty through Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). At confidence level ββ, we evaluate the force-closure margin at the mean of the adverse friction tail. This evaluation defines the risk-adjusted margin ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)}, the inscribed-ball radius of the corresponding grasp wrench space. We prove that ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} varies monotonically with ββ, remains differentiable in the grasp parameters, and certifies that any grasp with ε(β)>0\varepsilon^{(β)} > 0 achieves force closure with probability at least ββ. Across 1,599 LEAP Hand and Allegro Hand grasps, ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} identifies friction-sensitive grasps that receive high nominal Ferrari-Canny scores, and 53% of the nominally force-closed grasps lose closure in the adverse friction tail. The nominal margin ranks a successful grasp above a failed grasp with probabilities of only 0.53 in the shake test and 0.67 in the pick test, whereas ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} achieves 0.63 and 0.78. At an adverse friction coefficient of 0.2, 70% of grasps with positive ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} withstand a simulated lift and lateral pull, compared with 25% of grasps with positive nominal margin and nonpositive ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)}. We also synthesize grasps with positive ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} for the RealHand L6 and LEAP Hand, both of which retain the object during adverse-friction lifts. In MuJoCo trials with the RealHand L6, 95% of grasps that establish contact and have positive ε(β)\varepsilon^{(β)} retain the object at the same adverse friction coefficient.

Explore similar work

CardsList