eess.IVJul 30, 2026

Simulative Anomaly Detection using 2D Tomography

Authors: Moti Ben-HarushNimrod TenehGregory Lukovsky

Organizations: Elta Systems Ltd., Ashdod 7710202, Israel

Abstract

We present a novel technique for predicting the imaging quality of anomalies such as cancer cells located inside organic tissues. This technique is useful for evaluating and designing RF tomography sensors.

Explore similar work

May 23, 2026physics.med-ph

Catching magnetic resonance imaging outliers in artificial intelligence-supported radiotherapy workflows: unsupervised detection and localization of image anomalies using deep learning

Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into radiotherapy workflows, yet such pipelines remain vulnerable to out-of-distribution image data that may introduce unexpected behavior in clinical tasks. Deep learning-based anomaly detection for pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains largely unexplored, and transparent evaluation of its feasibility for full automation is limited. We developed and evaluated a fully automated, unsupervised anomaly-detection framework for pelvic and brain MRI. A two-stage framework was trained on reference images from public datasets: LUND-PROBE for pelvic MRI, and IXI, fastMRI, and fastMRI+ for brain MRI. In the first stage, MRI slices were compressed into discrete tokens; in the second, the distribution of normal tokens was modeled. Anomaly evidence was estimated by combining perceptual image differences with token-surprisal scores based on negative log-likelihood. Automated detection was evaluated on pelvic MRI with synthetic global and real clinical anomalies, and on brain MRI with clinically annotated fastMRI+ abnormalities. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and false-positive behavior in held-out normal cases were assessed. The framework achieved robust detection across hidden evaluation cohorts, with AUCs of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.87) for pelvic and brain MRI, respectively. Heatmap analysis showed strong spatial agreement between detected anomalies and ground-truth locations, supporting localization accuracy and interpretability. These results support the potential of unsupervised anomaly detection as an automated MRI quality-control layer for radiotherapy workflows, with transparent visualization of image regions likely to compromise downstream AI-based tasks.
Mustafa Kadhim, Viktor Rogowski, Emilia Persson +7
Aug 17, 2026cs.CV

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Image Dataset Quality Assurance in Multi-Center Breast MRI

Corrupted, inconsistent, or anomalous data silently threatens the safety and reliability of medical AI. Despite growing regulatory recognition of dataset quality assurance (QA) for high-risk medical AI, scalable automated detection remains underdeveloped. We employ unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection as an automated dataset QA mechanism for multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. We build a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets (protocol violations, processing errors, incorrect anatomical regions) and propose a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes. The benchmark includes near-, medium-far-, far-OOD samples, as well as in-distribution and external normal data. Four methods are evaluated: a projection-based method extended with a domain-specific feature extractor and a novel positional encoding, a reconstruction-based approach extended to full 3D volumes with an augmented training objective, and two unmodified hybrid OOD detection methods. Medium-far- and far-OOD samples are detected reliably, whereas near-OOD samples and external normal data from unseen institutions expose method-specific differences. The 3D reconstruction-based approach best balances detection performance (AUROC: 0.936) and generalization to unseen institutions. The projection-based method with positional encoding achieves the highest overall detection performance (AUROC: 0.954). Both hybrid methods exhibit critical failure modes, confirming that methods validated for one modality or anatomy may not generalize without domain-specific adaptation. Implants and mastectomies remain an open challenge for all methods. Our results establish a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.
Chiara Tappermann, Steffen Renisch, Lars Ole Schwen +3
Jul 27, 2026cs.CV

Panda: Unsupervised Pelvic Anomaly Detection for Real-Time MR Imaging

Female pelvic diseases remain an under researched area characterized by often delayed diagnosis. While pelvic MRI offers superior soft-tissue contrast for diagnosis and image-guided procedures, real-time anomaly detection remains challenging due to physiological motion, tissue deformation, and instrument artifacts. Existing supervised approaches are impractical, as adverse events are rare, heterogeneous, and difficult to annotate. We present a Dinomaly-based unsupervised anomaly detection framework adapted for pelvic MRI that learns normative representations from healthy cases and flags deviations without requiring labels. Our approach leverages a frozen DINOv3 Vision Transformer encoder combined with a noisy MLP bottleneck and Linear Attention decoder to prevent identity mapping while maintaining computational efficiency. Anomalies are localized via per-token cosine distance between encoder and decoder representations, yielding spatial anomaly maps that provide immediate feedback at the scanner to support radiologist decision-making and adaptive protocol adjustment. Evaluated on a curated subset of the Uterine Myoma Dataset, the framework achieves a pixel-level AUROC of 88.06% and high specificity (95.45%) at frame level at 40.5 slices/s, meeting real-time clinical deployment requirements. The spatial anomaly maps and frame-level scores provide immediate, localized feedback at the scanner to support radiologist decision-making and adaptive protocol adjustment during active procedures.
Anika Knupfer, Maximilian Lindholz, Johanna Paula Müller +4