stat.APAug 5, 2026

Distribution-Free Conformal Prediction for Steel Fatigue Strength: Marginal Validity Is Not Enough

Authors: Irene Boruah

Organizations: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dibrugarh University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Dibrugarh, 786004, Assam, India.

Abstract

Predicting fatigue failure in steel components experimentally is costly because it requires testing across multiple compositions and processing conditions. This has spurred research on data-driven prediction models. Studies using the NIMS MatNavi steel fatigue dataset often report high point-prediction accuracy but rely on aggregate error metrics, leaving uncertainty about the reliability of individual predictions and whether accuracy is consistent across the fatigue-strength spectrum. This paper is the first to apply conformal prediction to steel fatigue strength, comparing five interval-construction methods across 50 independent data splits and distinguishing marginal coverage from coverage within specific sub-regions of the predicted property. A gradient-boosting point model achieves an R^2 of 0.976 +/- 0.009 and a mean absolute error of 18.3 +/- 2.3 MPa. Split-conformal prediction provides valid marginal coverage (0.918) but drops to 0.755 in the highest-strength quartile, where design margins are most critical, a pattern also observed with a Gaussian process baseline. A cross-fitted, normalized conformal method restores near-uniform coverage across all quartiles (0.869-0.938) without a significant increase in interval width, by scaling the interval based on a cross-fitted estimate of local prediction difficulty rather than using a single global width. Diagnostic analysis traces the residual gap in the highest-strength quartile to elevated residual variance (2.7x the pooled Q1-Q3 level) rather than a systematic bias, situating the shortfall against a proven distribution-free limit on exact conditional coverage. Marginal coverage claims for ML-based fatigue-strength predictions can conceal systematic unreliability precisely where engineering decisions are most risky; therefore, conditional coverage should be routinely assessed alongside marginal coverage.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Aug 6, 2026stat.ML

Beyond Marginal Validity: Finite-Sample Guarantees for Localized Conformal Prediction

Conformal prediction endows arbitrary black-box predictors with finite-sample, distribution-free marginal coverage, yet marginal validity can hide severe covariate-specific miscalibration, while exact distribution-free conditional coverage is finite-sample unattainable. Randomly localized conformal prediction (RLCP) mitigates this gap by calibrating near the test point while preserving marginal coverage. Existing theory, however, lacks finite-sample guarantees for the realized localized set that jointly control conditional validity and oracle efficiency. We provide such guarantees. For any fixed score, under Hölder regularity of the conditional score CDF and standard density and kernel assumptions, we prove high-probability bounds, uniform over a realized localization neighbourhood, for the conditional-coverage gap and the length error relative to the oracle. The bounds decompose into an O(hβ)O(h^β) localization bias and a calibration term decreasing with calibration size, clarifying the bandwidth bias-variance tradeoff and when RLCP tracks the oracle. We also analyze data-split learned scores: when the score targets a pivotal score, as in conformalized quantile regression, uniform local guarantees decompose into fixed-score calibration and uniform score-estimation errors, showing that improved learning sharpens localized guarantees.
Anton Conrad, Rustam Isaev, Denis Belomestny +2
Conformal PredictionQuantile RegressionConstruct ValidityEmpirical Risk Minimization
AskPDF
Apr 20, 2026math.ST

Conformal Robust Set Estimation

Conformal prediction provides finite-sample, distribution-free coverage under exchangeability, but standard constructions may lack robustness in the presence of outliers or heavy tails. We propose a robust conformal method based on a non-conformity score defined as the half-mass radius around a point, equivalently the distance to its (⌊n/2⌋+1)(\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1)-nearest neighbour. We show that the resulting conformal regions are marginally valid for any sample size and converge in probability to a robust population central set defined through a distance-to-a-measure functional. Under mild regularity conditions, we establish exponential concentration and tail bounds that quantify the deviation between the empirical conformal region and its population counterpart. These results provide a probabilistic justification for using robust geometric scores in conformal prediction, even for heavy-tailed or multi-modal distributions.
Alejandro Cholaquidis, Emilien Joly, Leonardo Moreno
Conformal InferenceConformal PredictionOutliersDistance
AskPDF
Jul 30, 2026cs.LG

Predicting Steel Fatigue Life from Micrographs Using Physics-Informed Deep Learning

Here is the plain text version optimized for arXiv's submission form. Custom macros (like \CV and \SI) have been converted to standard text/math so they render correctly on the webpage: Evaluating the fatigue life of structural steels conventionally requires mechanical testing lasting tens to hundreds of hours, making it impractical for rapid quality control. We present CV, a computer vision framework that estimates the fatigue life (log⁡Nf\log N_f) of lightweight alloy steels directly from optical micrographs without physical testing.The pipeline features a seven-stage OpenCV preprocessing routine to remove artifacts, a 28-dimensional physics-informed feature extractor (quantifying crack morphology, grain structure, porosity, and texture), and a CNN regression model trained with a Gaussian negative log-likelihood (GNLL) loss to jointly predict log⁡Nf\log N_f and sample-specific uncertainty σ^\hatσ.Evaluating three architectures (SE-CNN, ResNet-50, VGG-16) on a synthetic micrograph benchmark, ResNet-50 achieves R2=0.93R^2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.18 log-cycles, and macro-F1 = 0.91. The GNLL objective reduces Expected Calibration Error by 76% compared to a mean-squared-error baseline (ECE: 0.089→0.0210.089 \rightarrow 0.021). Grad-CAM maps confirm the network attends to metallurgically meaningful microstructural features.Running in under 65 ms per image, the pipeline and synthetic dataset generator are open-sourced. Because validation relies entirely on synthetic micrographs, these results demonstrate methodological soundness under simulated conditions; a domain-transfer study on real field samples is the immediate next step.
Aryuemaan Kumar Chowdhury
Porous MediaUseful Life PredictionCrackComputer Vision
AskPDF