Nutrition Data Infrastructure for the AI Era: Operationalizing FAIR for Agent-Mediated Research

Geospatial datasets support applications from urban planning to climate modeling, yet consistent assessment of FAIR compliance is difficult. Existing evaluators use different rubrics and evidence sources and may fail on JavaScript-rendered pages or repository-specific identifiers. For 50 datasets from 10 repositories, the standard deviation of normalized scores across available tools averages 15.0 percentage points and reaches 30.3 for one dataset. Because these outputs are not equivalent measurements, we use them to characterize disagreement and failure modes, not comparative accuracy. We present AgentFAIR, a multi-agent framework combining structured metadata extraction with 13 sub-principle-specific LLM evaluators. Each produces a 0-3 maturity score, cited evidence, and recommendations; a critic checks evidence and consistency and can request targeted re-evaluation. Mean Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability scores are 79.7%, 70.4%, 45.3%, and 72.0%. Rank correlations with four baseline tools range from 0.31 to 0.61; the FAIR-enough comparison is not statistically significant. On a 10-dataset repeated-run subset, sub-principle agreement averages 89% (standard deviation: 3 percentage points), versus 71% without the critic. A preliminary 15-dataset expert study yields Fleiss' kappa of 0.71 and 82% alignment with expert consensus. API cost is approximately USD 0.054 per dataset. These results support auditability and feasibility, while the limited benchmark, incomplete ablations, and single-model-family validation constrain claims about accuracy and generalization.

Computational nutrition needs precise ingredient data, but current databases are incomplete, inconsistent, and built for human reference rather than automated reasoning. LLMs could help fill these gaps, but single-pass outputs are unreliable and can introduce silent errors into downstream computation. We present a quality-controlled LLM pipeline for ingredient data acquisition that combines robust statistical estimation, domain-specific invariant checks, and a web-fetch fallback. An illustrative Heap's Law fit to 233 recipes suggests that unique-ingredient growth is sub-linear and front-loaded: the projected ratio of unique ingredients to recipes falls from 1.74 at 100 recipes to 0.19 at 5,000. For each ingredient attribute, repeated LLM queries are treated as samples from a model-induced answer distribution, and we apply robust point estimators and normalised confidence scores across numerical, Boolean, multiple-choice, open categorical, and optional integer types. An invariant guard layer enforces nutritional and logical self-consistency within each ingredient record. Minor numeric inconsistencies are reconciled via a linear program that minimises worst-case percentage deviation while preserving semantic zeros, and major violations are escalated to web-evidence-grounded repair, then human review only if that fails. On a curated 30-ingredient reference set, the pipeline achieves 98.4% exact match on nutrient flags and cuts median absolute percentage error on nutrient ratios from 31.9% for the median-aggregated baseline to 10.1%, a reduction of 21.8 percentage points, at an API cost of about $1 per ingredient. This frames LLM-assisted database construction as a controlled data-engineering workflow that makes uncertainty operational rather than discarding it.

An embodied kitchen assistant must do more than recognize food in isolated frames. It must track ingredient states over time and integrate visual observations with recipe and nutritional knowledge to support constraint-aware decision-making. We formalize this capability as \emph{Embodied Nutrition Management}: perceiving nutrition-relevant events, maintaining a persistent food state, and using it for knowledge-grounded planning. Existing benchmarks evaluate static food understanding or embodied cooking actions, but do not measure whether an agent can continuously update and use nutrition-relevant states in dynamic kitchens. To fill this gap, we introduce \textbf{NutriBench-Kitchen}, a benchmark containing 1,500 manually verified question--answer pairs from 160 cooking videos. It covers five task families: Ingredient Entry, Memory Management, Recipe Query, Long-Term Planning, and Short-Term Planning, spanning food-state construction, maintenance, knowledge retrieval, and decision-making across different planning horizons. Evaluations of proprietary and open-source large vision-language models reveal a substantial gap from human performance, particularly in quantitative ingredient estimation, long-term state tracking, and reasoning under interacting constraints. We further introduce \textbf{Nutri-Vgent}, a diagnostic long-video agent with separate episodic, food-state, and recipe memories. Its consistent improvements demonstrate the value of explicit state representations and structured memory for nutrition management. Together, NutriBench-Kitchen and Nutri-Vgent provide a testbed for studying persistent state tracking and knowledge-grounded reasoning in dynamic kitchens. Code is available at https://github.com/V1ol1n/NutriBench-Kitchen.