Periocular Soft Biometrics: A Survey and Applications to Multimedia Forensics and Disinformation Detection
Organizations: School of Information Technology (ITE), Halmstad University, Sweden
Abstract
Soft-biometric attributes such as gender, age, and ethnicity provide valuable ancillary evidence when full identity recognition is not feasible, supporting applications in forensic investigation, identity verification, surveillance, or detection of synthetic and manipulated media. Among biometric modalities, the periocular region is a robust source of soft-biometric cues, as it often remains visible when other parts of the face are occluded, a frequent condition in forensic evidence and surveillance footage, and can be captured across a wide range of acquisition conditions. In this paper, we provide a survey of demographic attribute estimation from periocular images, covering publicly available datasets, methodological trends from handcrafted descriptors to deep learning architectures, and the state of the art in gender, age, and ethnicity prediction. We discuss use cases relevant to multimedia forensics and disinformation-detection applications, including demographic filtering in surveillance footage, age verification, and the detection of demographic inconsistencies in synthetic data. We also highlight open challenges, including dataset bias, cross-domain generalisation, fairness, ethical aspects, and the lack of forensic-oriented benchmarks.
Figures & tables
| Best accuracy | |||||||||
| Ref. | Year | Database | Type | Images | Subj. | Spectrum | Gender | Age | Ethnicity |
| [ 39 ] | 1998 | AR | face | +4000 | 126 | VIS | 85.61% | - | - |
| [ 51 ] | 2000 | FERET | face | 14126 | 1199 | VIS | 90% | - | 98.5% |
| [ 50 ] | 2005 | FRGC | face | 36818 | 741 | VIS | 97.5% | - | 98.7% |
| [ 57 ] | 2006 | MORPH-II | face | 55k | 13k | VIS | - | 3.63 yr | - |
| [ 26 ] | 2007 | LFW | face | 13233 | 5749 | VIS | 93.4% | 60.2% | 82.9% |
| PERIOCULAR GENDER ESTIMATION | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. | Year | Method | Database | Spec-trum | Eyes | Accu-racy |
| [ 34 ] | 2012 | ICA + NN | FERET | VIS | Both | 90% |
| [ 54 ] | 2017 | (LBP, LTP, LPQ, BSIF, HOG) + (SVM, MLP) | VISOB | VIS | One | 90.2% |
| [ 62 ] | 2017 | Deep Class-Encoder | ND-Iris-0405 | NIR | One | 82.53% |
| [ 67 ] | 2017 | (Intensity, Texture, Shape) + RF | Cross-Eyed | V+N | One | 90% |
| [ 7 ] | 2019 | compass LBP + SVM | Adience | VIS | One Both | 84.06% 83.27% |
| PERIOCULAR AGE ESTIMATION | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. | Year | Method | Database | Spec-trum | Classes | Eyes | Accuracy |
| [ 73 ] | 2014 | 23 sub-CNNs | MORPH-II | VIS | 62 | Face parts | 3.63 yr (MAE) |
| [ 16 ] | 2019 | 4 sub-CNNs | Adience | VIS | 8 | Face parts | 51.03% (group) 83.41% (1-off) |
| [ 3 ] | 2020 | CNN + SVM | LFW | VIS | 3 | One Both | 60.2% (group) 60.0% (group) |
| PERIOCULAR ETHNICITY ESTIMATION | |||||||
| Ref. | Year | Method | Database | Spec-trum | Classes | Eyes | Accuracy |
Biometric Identification
Biometric identification matches or verifies people and animals using distinctive physical, physiological, or behavioral signals.
See all 128 papers