This paper presents a demand-driven framework for on-demand Urban Air Mobility (UAM) network design that links vertiport siting, fleet simulation, and door-to-door travel-time feasibility. Demand is estimated from commuter and passenger activity data, converted into spatial trip-end points, and clustered using K-means to generate candidate vertiport locations. Candidate networks are screened using range and minimum station-spacing constraints, then evaluated with a discrete-event simulation that models multi-vehicle dispatch, deadhead relocation, battery swaps, and service regularity. Flight time and energy consumption are computed using a point-mass eVTOL performance model. In a Greater Los Angeles case study, the preferred design expands from four stations and four eVTOLs at low demand to sixteen stations and twelve eVTOLs at the highest tested demand level. Results show that larger fleets improve completion time and vehicle-arrival regularity but do not eliminate deadhead flights, indicating that spatial demand imbalance remains an operational burden. The travel-time savings analysis further suggests that UAM is most defensible for longer or congestion-heavy trips where sufficient non-flight time remains after accounting for flight time.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Door-to-door UAM trip schematic and ground alternative
Fig. 2 : UAM network design and evaluation pipeline
Fig. 3 : DES Dispatch and Relocation Logic
Parameter (unit)
Description
Value
Δmax(km)
Max inter-station distance
81
Δmin(km)
Min station spacing
10
O
Number of runs
250
Ebat(MJ)
Battery usable energy
339
{TCB,Tboard,Tdeboard,Tclr}(s)
Swap, board, deboard, clearance times
{90,240,150,45}
v(km/h)
Average ground speed
{50,80}
TABLE I : Case-study parameters and operational constants
# Stations
Avg. ss(k)
Infeasible missions
Min dist. (km)
Max dist. (km)
4
0.6297
0
20
55
8
0.6359
0
14
70
12
0.6713
0
12
76
16
0.6949
0
11
78
18
0.6915
2
8
78
TABLE II : Clustering results
Fig. 4 : Centroids of the 16-clusters case used as candidate station locations; station latitudes and longitudes are annotated
Fig. 5 : Stations mapping over the study area
D
(K∗,F∗)
ET (h)
MVAI (min)
DHR (%)
CB
100
(4, 4)
2
18
22
15
500
(8, 8)
6
26
28
77
1000
(8, 8)
11
34
30
145
2000
(16, 12)
15
37
29
337
TABLE III : Preferred candidate design and performance across demand scenarios
K
F
ET (h)
MVAI (min)
DHR (%)
CB
4
16
10
30
24
418
8
32
7
15
28
400
12
48
4
13
23
490
16
64
3
10
24
520
TABLE IV : Fleet-abundant extreme case for D=2000 with F=4K
Fig. 6 : Objective landscape for the weighted cost function J as a function of station count K and fleet size F under four demand scenarios: (a) D=100 , (b) D=500 , (c) D=1000 , and (d) D=2000
Fig. 7 : Station–fleet tradeoffs for D=2000 passengers. Panels report DES outcomes across tested station counts K and fleet sizes F : (a) completion/evacuation time, (b) service regularity proxy, (c) flight frequency, and (d) battery swaps
Fig. 8 : Deadhead burden for D=2000 : total number of flights versus percentage of deadhead flights
Fig. 9 : Maximum allowable non-flight time budget vs. station-to-station range for multiple travel-time savings targets at v=80km/h
Reliable wireless connectivity is essential for urban air mobility (UAM) networks in dense urban environments. It is therefore imperative to carefully plan the supporting communication infrastructure for UAM flight corridors. Most existing works optimize communication infrastructure and UAV flight paths independently, often leading to unnecessary base station (BS) deployment or excessive flight detours. This paper studies the joint optimization of BS deployment and UAV flight corridors in complex urban environments, aiming to minimize both infrastructure investment and flight distance while satisfying communication quality constraints. We propose CR-CMAB, a channel reciprocity-guided combinatorial multi-armed bandit framework. The framework constructs high-fidelity radio maps using 3D ray tracing, selects BS combinations via coverage-aware CMAB search, and dynamically expands the search space by identifying promising BS locations through channel reciprocity. Experimental results from a detailed case study demonstrate that CR-CMAB outperforms baseline methods with moderate computational time, yielding more strategically positioned BSs and shorter flight corridors. This study offers a practical planning perspective for cost-effective and communication-reliable UAM deployment in future smart cities.
The growing demand for Urban Air Mobility (UAM) introduces significant challenges in airspace management, particularly within densely populated metropolitan regions. As the number of aerial vehicles-such as drones, air taxis, and helicopters-continues to rise, so does the risk of mid-air collisions and conflicts with existing air traffic and obstacles. Ensuring safe and efficient UAM operations requires robust strategic deconfliction mechanisms. We propose an Answer Set Programming (ASP) based approach for strategic deconfliction, focusing on time synchronization and route optimization for conflict-free flight plans. The solution is benchmarked against Constraint Programming (CP), emphasizing scalability and resource use. Results show that ASP offers faster execution and better scalability for small to medium cases, while CP maintains stable memory but degrades with complexity.
Uncrewed aerial vehicle base stations (UAV-BSs) are expected to cover traffic demand that shifts across space and time, yet most repositioning schemes either re-solve an optimization problem per slot or learn reactive policies without an explicit demand model. We cast demand-driven fleet repositioning as latent-space decision-time planning and propose DSWM, a decomposed spatio-temporal world model: an agentic controller that perceives the demand field through a rolling observation window, retains operational context in a latent recurrent state, reasons about candidate motions by imagined rollouts under an uncertainty penalty, and coordinates the fleet through replanned first actions. DSWM learns a recurrent state-space model shaped by an exponential-moving-average (EMA) based latent predictive objective with variance regularization. It attaches a differentiable service simulator that replays the association, probabilistic line-of-sight channel, and Shannon rate chain inside latent rollouts. Planning uses a cross-entropy method whose imagined demand is anchored on the current observation window with mixing coefficient ρ=0.95. On a unified pipeline over three real datasets (Milan CDR (call detail record), Shanghai Telecom, YJMob100K) and 14 methods including five reproduced IEEE baselines, DSWM attains weekday served ratios of 0.889, 0.908, and 0.898, ranking first among non-ablated configurations on every dataset. On Milan it improves over the strongest non-learning baseline (Greedy, 0.780) by 0.109, a margin that comes from decision-time use of observations rather than prediction accuracy.
Shengjie Zhong, Zhongliang Zhao, Jingxuan Chen +4
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China