GATTA: Graph Active Learning with Test-Time Augmentation
Organizations: Department of Artificial Intelligence and Systems Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, Budapest, H-1117, Hungary. · Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Test-time augmentation (TTA) has proven effective for improving model robustness and uncertainty estimation in computer vision, yet its application to graph-structured data remains largely unexplored. We introduce GATTA (Graph Active Learning with Test-Time Augmentation), a framework for enhancing active learning by aggregating predictions across multiple augmented views to produce more reliable uncertainty estimates. To address the challenge of label-preserving graph augmentations, GATTA incorporates a consistency-based filtering mechanism that discards augmented views yielding unreliable predictions. We systematically evaluate GATTA across multiple graph datasets, GNN architectures, and acquisition strategies. Our results show that simple uncertainty-based methods, such as Entropy and Least Confidence, benefit most from TTA, achieving performance competitive with more sophisticated and computationally expensive approaches. GATTA generalizes across architectures, outperforms model-side ensemble methods such as MC Dropout. We further show that GATTA scales efficiently with both ensemble size and graph size. Extensive analysis of augmentation types, strengths, and filtering strategies provides practical guidelines for effective deployment. Our findings demonstrate that augmenting simple methods with TTA offers a more efficient path to strong active learning performance than engineering complex acquisition functions, enabling practitioners to achieve competitive results with lower computational overhead and reduced implementation complexity.
Figures & tables
| Strategy | Average | 75th percentile |
| Feature Masking | ||
| Feature Noising | ||
| Edge Dropout | ||
| FM + ED | ||
| FN + ED |
| Simple | Complex | Other | |||||||||||||
| Dataset | Entropy-P | Entropy-S | LC-P | LC-S | MP | ESP | ANRMAB | AGE | GEEM | ||||||
| GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | SGC | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | SGC | |
| Citeseer | |||||||||||||||
| CoraML | |||||||||||||||
| PubMed | |||||||||||||||
| Amazon Photos | |||||||||||||||
| GATTA | MCD | Am. Co. | Am. Ph. | Cite. | Cora | PubM. |
| – | ✓ | +5.71 | -0.49 | +1.32 | +1.93 | +1.07 |
| P | – | -0.02 | +0.33 | +1.13 | +2.89 | +4.80 |
| ✓ | -8.39 | -0.98 | +2.03 | +0.45 | +2.00 | |
| S | – | -1.52 | +2.20 | +1.87 | +2.09 | +3.70 |
| ✓ | +4.24 | -0.30 | +1.78 | +1.36 | +2.85 |
Appendix figures & tables17 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Dataset | #Nodes | #Edges | #Features | #Classes | Edge Density | Homophily |
| CoraML | 2,810 | 15,962 | 2,879 | 7 | 0.20% | 78.44% |
| Citeseer | 1,681 | 5,804 | 602 | 6 | 0.20% | 92.76% |
| PubMed | 19,717 | 88,648 | 500 | 3 | 0.02% | 80.24% |
| AmazonComputers | 13,381 | 491,556 | 767 | 10 | 0.27% | 77.72% |
| AmazonPhotos | 7,484 | 238,086 | 745 | 8 | 42.47% | 82.72% |
| Layers | Hidden Dim. | Learning Rate | Max Epochs | Weight Decay | Dropout |
| 1 | [64] | 0.001 | 10,000 | 0.001 | 0.8 |
| Filtering | GATTA-P | GATTA-S | Average |
| Hard | |||
| Firm | |||
| None | |||
| Average |
| Citeseer | CoraML | PubMed | Amazon Photos | Amazon Computers | |||||||
| Strategy | GATTA | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC | GCN | SGC |
| Entropy | – | ||||||||||
| P | |||||||||||
| S | |||||||||||
| LC | – | ||||||||||
| P | |||||||||||
| Amazon Computers | Amazon Photos | CiteSeer | CoraML | PubMed | |
| Entropy | 70.06 7.97 | 84.47 6.12 | 87.48 3.44 | 74.61 4.7 | 67.69 6.13 |
| + MCD | 75.77 3.64 | 83.98 4.41 | 88.8 1.72 | 76.54 3.62 | 68.76 5.63 |
| GATTA-P | 70.04 7.05 | 84.8 6.13 | 88.61 1.75 | 77.5 2.72 | 72.49 3.6 |
| + MCD | 61.67 9.31 | 83.49 5.83 | 89.51 1.07 | 75.06 3.11 | 69.69 5.61 |
| GATTA-S | 68.54 10.98 | 86.67 3.91 | 89.35 1.01 | 76.7 2.83 | 71.39 4.58 |
| + MCD | 74.3 5.5 | 84.17 7.42 | 89.26 1.45 | 75.97 2.74 | 70.54 4.74 |
| Amazon Computers | Amazon Photos | CiteSeer | CoraML | PubMed | ||
| GCN | – | 70.06 7.81 | 84.47 5.99 | 87.48 3.37 | 74.61 4.61 | 67.69 6.01 |
| P | 70.04 6.91 | 83.41 6.34 | 89.51 1.60 | 77.50 2.67 | 72.49 3.53 | |
| S | 74.58 6.51 | 86.67 3.83 | 89.30 1.35 | 76.19 3.35 | 72.27 5.49 | |
| SGC | – | 69.18 6.63 | 79.79 8.91 | 84.67 6.29 | 76.89 4.06 | 67.37 5.79 |
| P | 70.08 7.24 | 81.02 7.98 | 87.93 1.81 | 78.64 2.83 | 67.89 7.36 | |
| S | 74.57 4.2 | 85.39 5.99 | 89.14 1.22 | 81.01 1.63 | 69.95 6.75 |