Parts of speech categorization is understood in the European linguistic tradition as crisp categorization, which is also reflected in corpus linguistics, where each disambiguated token is assigned exactly one POS. However, the assigned categories are largely determined by arbitrary decisions distilled into annotation manuals. Since some words stand between parts of speech in their semantics or typical syntax, and some parts of speech are closer to each other than others, POS categorization seems inherently fuzzy. We analyze this fuzziness using word2vec embeddings, training a neural network to reduce their high dimensionality to three dimensions relevant for determining parts of speech. This creates a three-dimensional space onto which we map several thousand words, revealing which are prototypical and which lie on the boundaries, and visualizing relationships between parts of speech. The study uses Universal Dependencies POS tags for French, Czech, Finnish, Russian, and English.
Figures & tables
Traditional POS
UPOS
Category
noun
NOUN
common noun
PROPN
proper noun
verb
VERB
main verb
AUX
auxiliary verb or other tense, aspect, or mood particle
adjective
ADJ
adjective
DET
determiner (including article)
Table 1: Universal POS
Figure 1: Layout of the neural network used in the experiment
I NOUN I VERB I AUX I ADJ I DET I NUM I ADV I PRON I ADP I CCONJ I SCONJ
I NOUN I VERB I AUX I ADJ I DET I NUM I ADV I PRON I ADP I CCONJ I PART I SCONJ
I NOUN I VERB I AUX I ADJ I NUM I ADV I PRON I ADP I CCONJ I SCONJ
I NOUN I VERB I AUX I ADJ I DET I NUM I ADV I PRON I ADP I CCONJ I PART I SCONJ
I NOUN I VERB I AUX I ADJ I DET I NUM I ADV I PRON I ADP I CCONJ I PART I SCONJ
Sparse AutoEncoders (SAEs) offer a promising way to inspect language model representations, but it is still unclear what kind of linguistic structure their latents expose. We use part-of-speech (PoS) categories as a controlled test case to study whether morpho-syntactic information is encoded by individual latents or by structured groups of features. We find that PoS distinctions are highly recoverable from SAE activations, but do not align with one-to-one latent / category mappings. This recoverability is not reducible to lexical memorisation, and Open and Closed PoS classes differ substantially. Categories are supported by compact groups of sparse latents, with substantial variation across tags. These groups remain stable on held-out data, while also showing overlap between related categories. Our results show that SAEs localise morpho-syntactic information in a distributed and category-dependent form rather than through atomic grammatical features.
This study investigates the relationship between the phonological and morphological structure of Polish words and their meanings using Distributional Semantics. In the present analysis, we ask whether there is a relationship between the form properties of words containing consonant clusters and their meanings. Is the phonological and morphonological structure of complex words mirrored in semantic space? We address these questions for Polish, a language characterized by non-trivial morphology and an impressive inventory of morphologically-motivated consonant clusters. We use statistical and computational techniques, such as t-SNE, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Linear Discriminative Learning, and demonstrate that -- apart from encoding rich morphosyntactic information (e.g. tense, number, case) -- semantic vectors capture information on sub-lexical linguistic units such as phoneme strings. First, phonotactic complexity, morphotactic transparency, and a wide range of morphosyntactic categories available in Polish (case, gender, aspect, tense, number) can be predicted from embeddings without requiring any information about the forms of words. Second, we argue that computational modelling with the discriminative lexicon model using embeddings can provide highly accurate predictions for comprehension and production, exactly because of the existence of extensive information in semantic space that is to a considerable extent isomorphic with structure in the form space.
Paula Orzechowska, R. Harald Baayen
Adam Mickiewicz University · University of Tübingen
Neural language models are typically trained on next-token prediction, although linguistic structure spans multiple temporal scales. Successor representations (SRs) make this horizon explicit by encoding discounted distributions over future states. Here, we ask whether such predictive representations can recover not only word classes, but also finer functional and construction-like structure from natural language. A residual network trained on WikiText-103 predicts SR distributions at three horizons without part-of-speech supervision. At the shortest horizon, unsupervised clustering robustly recovers nouns, verbs, and adjectives, while directed inter-cluster transitions reproduce familiar syntactic asymmetries. At finer resolutions and across 13 part-of-speech categories, the same geometry reveals semantic-functional groupings that cross category boundaries and directed relations tracing candidate date, measurement, and title-name constructions. Part-of-speech agreement declines as the predictive horizon lengthens. These results suggest that word classes are coarse regions within a richer predictive geometry in which categorical and construction-like linguistic structure emerge from future-word distributions.
Mathis Immertreu, Achim Schilling, Thomas Kinfe +1
Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Group, Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany · Neuromodulation and Neuroprosthetics, University Hospital Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Germany · Neuroscience Lab, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany +1