Deep learning-based computed tomography (CT) derived body composition classifier for colorectal cancer patients

Lower extremity computed tomography (CT) contains clinically relevant information for body composition analysis, sarcopenia assessment, and musculoskeletal disease monitoring, but extracting these measurements at scale requires accurate tissue segmentation and an automated quantification workflow. Existing public segmentation tools are not designed for comprehensive lower extremity CT analysis, particularly for clinically important inter/intramuscular adipose tissue, and most public methods only provide mask prediction rather than an end-to-end quantification system. To address this problem, we present LegSegNet, a deep learning system for lower extremity CT tissue segmentation and body composition quantification. Given an input CT scan, LegSegNet segments bone, skeletal muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and inter/intramuscular adipose tissue. It then computes quantitative tissue measurements for downstream analysis. We developed the segmentation model using 1,302 manually annotated CT slices and evaluated it on 900 held-out test slices, with all annotations reviewed by radiologists. We benchmark LegSegNet against a broad set of 2D segmentation methods, including CNN-based models, transformer-based models, and finetuned foundation models, and further evaluate its generalization on an external public CT dataset. LegSegNet achieves the best overall segmentation performance, with an average Dice score of 89.31 on the held-out test set. To our knowledge, LegSegNet is the first publicly available end-to-end system for lower extremity CT tissue segmentation and quantification, providing a practical evaluation tool for future computer vision research in medical image analysis. The code and model weights are available at: https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/LegSegNet

Background: Automated 3D segmentation of muscles and adipose tissue from CT is vital for body composition analysis, but multi-source data heterogeneity and high CPU memory demands hinder clinical deployment. Methods: We propose a coarse-to-fine hierarchical framework to segment ten tissue structures. Efficiency is optimized using Dynamic Spacing and Anisotropic Patching, a Group Inference mechanism for low-memory sliding-window processing, and Topology-Aware Asymmetric Resampling for fast post-processing. Results: The framework was trained on 1,558 CT volumes from seven public and two private datasets, and evaluated on an independent test cohort (N=105), per-structure Dice coefficients ranged from 0.924 to 0.982. Eight major structures met the +-10% relative error clinical acceptance limit. On a 12-core CPU workstation, the GPU-free pipeline averaged 44.5 seconds per volume with 4.73 GB peak memory. Conclusion: This framework balances accuracy and efficiency, enabling robust, large-scale body composition analysis on standard CPU workstations.

Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning ensemble for estimating adult sex, age, height, and weight from coronal digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from diagnostic CT. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 128,621 CT examinations from 80,004 adults at nine institutions in Japan. Three multitask models-ConvNeXt-Base, ViT-Base/16, and MaxViT-Base-were fine-tuned using coronal DRRs and combined by weighted averaging. Data were split by institution into training (114,147 examinations; seven institutions), tuning (4,305; one institution), and test (10,169; one institution) sets; generalizability was assessed on two non-Japanese datasets. Accuracy and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate sex classification and age, height, and weight regression, respectively. Body surface area (BSA)-corrected heart and liver volume trends were compared using true versus estimated height and weight. Results: In the test set (median age, 69.9 years; 4,899 of 10,169 [48.2%] male), overall sex-classification accuracy was 0.997 (95% CI, 0.996-0.998), and MAEs were 3.57 years (3.51-3.63), 2.59 cm (2.54-2.64), and 3.40 kg (3.34-3.47) for age, height, and weight, respectively. In examinations covering the chest through pelvis, accuracy was 1.000, and MAEs were 3.15 years, 2.28 cm, and 3.18 kg, respectively. BSA calculated from estimated values reproduced age-related heart and liver volume trends obtained using true values. On non-Japanese datasets, height error increased but was reduced by continued fine-tuning. Conclusion: The ensemble estimated adult sex, age, height, and weight from CT-derived DRRs, with generally lower errors in examinations with broader anatomical coverage.