Organizations: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA · Strength Research Department, Research and Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Nagasaki, 851-0392, Japan · Strength Research Department, Research and Innovation Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Takasago, 676-8686, Japan
This paper develops an adaptive surrogate modeling method for problems with very high-dimensional spatio-temporal outputs. The analysis of spatio-temporal multi-physics systems is computationally expensive and consists of a large number of inputs and outputs. Surrogate models are often constructed to replace the physics-based model to achieve computational efficiency in analyses such as uncertainty quantification and optimization that require many function calls. In order to address the challenge introduced by the high dimensionality of spatio-temporal output, a dimension reduction method is first employed to map the high-dimensional output to a low-dimensional latent space. This is followed by the construction of the surrogate model in the low-dimensional space. The prediction error in the original space, which includes both the reconstruction error and surrogate model error, is evaluated using different error metrics. Based on the prediction accuracy of the surrogate model, new training points are identified for adaptive improvement of the surrogate model. We present a novel adaptive sampling technique that combines exploration and exploitation to improve the surrogate model accuracy with the fewest possible runs of the expensive physics-based model. Thermo-mechanical analysis of a gas turbine engine blade is used to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Schematic describing the proposed procedure for surrogate model construction with high-dimensional field data using rSVD
Figure 2: Evolution of the NRMSE from the initial surrogate model (20 samples) to the final surrogate model (45 samples) using different adaptive sampling techniques, for the seven benchmark functions in Appendix A
Figure 3: Adaptively selected training point locations for the Branin’s function and the final surrogate model accuracy in terms of NRMSE are plotted in contours (Black dots: initial 20 samples, Red dots: additional 25 samples)
Figure 4: Adaptively selected training point locations for the Schwefel function and the final surrogate model accuracy in terms of NRMSE are plotted in contours (Black dots: initial 20 samples, Red dots: additional 25 samples)
Input
Values
TBC thickness
32× nominal to 34× nominal
T1T rate
80 × nominal to 100 × nominal
Transient creep rate
-3 σ to 3 σ
Constant creep rate
-3 σ to 3 σ
Output
Nomenclature
Creep equivalent strain
CEEQ
Table 1: Physics model input and output parameters
Figure 5: FEM model of engine rotor blade
Model
Fold #
Extra-Trees
LightGBM
XGBoost
CatBoost
DNN
GP
1
0.1722
0.2029
0.1823
0.1780
0.2102
0.2205
2
0.1885
0.2146
0.2113
0.1843
0.2243
0.2315
3
0.1329
0.1829
0.1732
0.1362
0.1856
0.1795
4
0.1090
0.1257
0.1219
0.1155
0.1351
0.1583
5
0.1123
0.1286
0.1199
0.1136
0.1209
0.1348
Table 2: 7-fold cross-validation results in terms of RMSE
Figure 6: Predicted vs. observed values of important features for FEM run 23
Figure 7: Actual Feature 1 values vs. TBC thickness and T1T rate
Batch id
β1
β2
α
γ
First batch: FEM 47-56
0.30
0.03
1
1
Second batch: FEM 57-60
0.56
0.23
1
1
Third batch: FEM 61-62
1
1
1
1
Fourth batch: FEM 63-66
0.53
0.04
1
1
Table 3: Optimal hyperparameter values of each batch
Figure 8: Initial FEM training data and adaptively selected additional samples
Figure 9: Final surrogate model prediction accuracy in the original space for leave-one-out FEM runs
Figure 10: Final surrogate model prediction compared against FEM run 36 at node 5057
Training data
Avg. PNMAE
Avg. PNrMAE
Avg. RMSE
FEM 1-46
27.9
19.3
0.00254
FEM 1-56
26.5
17.6
0.00222
FEM 1-60
26.3
17.3
0.00219
FEM 1-62
24.9
16.1
0.00209
FEM 1-66
24.6
15.8
0.00193
Table 4: Average LOOCV results of the first 46 FEM runs in terms of PNMAE, PNrMAE, and RMSE
In many engineering applications, a single high-fidelity model produces multiple quantities of interest (QoIs) under the same input parameters, e.g. finite element models of complex physical systems. To alleviate the high computational cost of direct model evaluations, surrogate models are widely used to construct efficient approximations of model responses. Naturally, the accuracy of surrogates strongly depends on the quality of the experimental design (ED). However, a single ED may not provide an adequate representation for all outputs simultaneously, especially when different outputs exhibit varying sensitivities to the input variables. A straightforward solution is to perform separate sampling for each output, but this results in increased sampling complexity and computational cost. From a statistical perspective, such an approach also ignores potential correlations among all outputs and may compromise data consistency. To address this issue, an adaptive sequential sampling method for constructing polynomial chaos expansion surrogate models is generalized for vector valued QoIs. The method sequentially selects new samples from a candidate pool based on their local contribution to the output variance, while balancing distance-based exploration of the input space and exploitation of aggregated variance information across all outputs. Its performance is compared with non-sequential Latin Hypercube Sampling through several numerical examples from engineering problems. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed strategy improves both surrogate accuracy and stability, and provides a more reliable estimation of second-order statistics.
Surrogate models provide compact relations between user-defined input parameters and output quantities of interest, enabling the efficient evaluation of complex parametric systems in many-query settings. Such capabilities are essential in a wide range of applications, including optimisation, control, data assimilation, uncertainty quantification, and emerging digital twin technologies in various fields such as manufacturing, personalised healthcare, smart cities, and sustainability. This article reviews established methodologies for constructing surrogate models exploiting either knowledge of the governing laws and the dynamical structure of the system (physics-based) or experimental observations (data-driven), as well as hybrid approaches combining these two paradigms. By revisiting the design of a surrogate model as a functional approximation problem, existing methodologies are reviewed in terms of the choice of (i) a reduced basis and (ii) a suitable approximation criterion. The paper reviews methodologies pertaining to the field of Scientific Machine Learning, and it aims at synthesising established knowledge, recent advances, and new perspectives on: dimensionality reduction, physics-based, and data-driven surrogate modelling based on proper orthogonal decomposition, proper generalised decomposition, and artificial neural networks; multi-fidelity methods to exploit information from sources with different fidelities; adaptive sampling, enrichment, and data augmentation techniques to enhance the quality of surrogate models.
Matteo Giacomini, Pedro Díez
Laboratori de Càlcul Numeric (LaCàN), E.T.S. de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain. · Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en Enginyeria (CIMNE), Barcelona, Spain.
Most practical engineering design problems involve nonlinear spatio-temporal dynamical systems. Multi-physics simulations are often performed to capture the fine spatio-temporal scales which govern the evolution of these systems. However, these simulations are often high-fidelity in nature, and can be computationally very expensive. Hence, generating data from these expensive simulations becomes a bottleneck in an end-to-end engineering design process. Spatio-temporal surrogate modeling of these dynamical systems has been a popular data-driven solution to tackle this computational bottleneck. This is because accurate machine learning models emulating the dynamical systems can be orders of magnitude faster than the actual simulations. However, one key limitation of purely data-driven approaches is their lack of generalizability to inputs outside the training distribution. In this paper, we propose a physics-informed spatio-temporal surrogate modeling (PISTM) framework constrained by the physics of the underlying dynamical system. The framework leverages state-of-the-art advancements in the field of Koopman autoencoders to learn the underlying spatio-temporal dynamics in a non-intrusive manner, coupled with a spatio-temporal surrogate model which predicts the behavior of the Koopman operator in a specified time window for unknown operating conditions. We evaluate our framework on a prototypical fluid flow problem of interest: two-dimensional incompressible flow around a cylinder.
Sudeepta Mondal, Soumalya Sarkar
Raytheon Technologies Research Center, 411 Silver Lane, East Hartford, CT 06108.