Generative imitation learning policies excel at trajectory planning but lack closed-loop force regulation, while directly incorporating force modalities often requires redesigning or retraining the network. We present UniReflex, a universal plug-and-play framework that equips frozen generative policies with variable impedance control (VIC) for contact regulation, guided by force-direction intent collected during demonstration, without further slow-backbone fine-tuning. By non-invasively intercepting deep latent representations from the action head, UniReflex drives a fast reflex network that decouples active force exertion from external interaction response. This scheme predicts normalized anisotropic stiffness directions for directional compliance allocation. Furthermore, UniReflex integrates an adaptive gating mechanism that enables seamless transitions between position-dominant planning and force-dominant execution. Real-world bimanual experiments demonstrate that UniReflex significantly improves contact stability and success rates while preserving original position accuracy. Our approach achieves 25-66x lower per-step backward latency relative to joint training strategies on the evaluated backbones.
Figures & tables
Category
Representative methods
Force ctrl.
Closed- loop
Variable stiff.
Ref. force
Plug- play
Fast-only training
Variable impedance control
Guided Control
ACP [ 15 ]
Active
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
Hybrid P/F Control
ForceVLA2 [ 23 ]
Active
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
Force-conditioned imitation learning
Force-aware DP
FoAR [ 13 ]
Passive
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Force-aware VLA
TA-VLA [ 37 ] , ForceVLA [ 34 ]
Passive
✗
✗
✗
✗
✗
Table 1: Taxonomy of force control methods. UniReflex uniquely enables active, variable-stiffness control while maintaining plug-and-play compatibility with frozen generative policies via fast-only training.
Figure 1: System architecture of UniReflex . UniReflex hierarchically couples slow vision-driven planning, a fast proprioceptive reflex, and a real-time execution layer that tracks predicted reference forces together with reference-impedance targets.
Figure 2: Five contact-rich tasks: short per-task introductions and the main physical challenges, together with a two-stage evaluation protocol.
Policy
Wipe (Curve)
Wipe (Incline)
Plug Charger
Peel Note
Flip Chip Box
lift
wipe
lift
wipe
lift
plug
lift
peel
push
flip
RDP
60.0%
50.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
60.0%
50.0%
70.0%
50.0%
ForceVLA
30.0%
20.0%
50.0%
30.0%
30.0%
0.0%
50.0%
30.0%
40.0%
20.0%
TA-VLA
50.0%
50.0%
70.0%
50.0%
40.0%
40.0%
70.0%
40.0%
50.0%
30.0%
DP
70.0%
30.0%
80.0%
30.0%
70.0%
50.0%
90.0%
30.0%
80.0%
30.0%
π0
80.0%
30.0%
90.0%
30.0%
80.0%
50.0%
90.0%
30.0%
90.0%
30.0%
Table 2: Success Rates (%) on Contact-Rich Benchmarks. Phase I vs. Phase II; UniReflex-augmented policies vs. vanilla backbones and force-aware baselines.
Variant
Peel Note
Wipe (Curve)
Wipe (Incline)
Force/stiffness output (Phase II success / F-err.)
UniReflex (DP)
90.0% / 5.8%
70.0% / 8.9%
70.0% / 6.8%
No stiffness mod.
50.0% / 32.4%
30.0% / 38.7%
40.0% / 35.6%
Fixed isotropic stiffness
50.0% / 28.3%
40.0% / 34.2%
30.0% / 36.5%
Wrench-only
30.0% / 34.1%
20.0% / 37.4%
20.0% / 33.8%
Manual impedance
60.0% / 18.4%
50.0% / 19.2%
40.0% / 17.6%
Table 3: Component ablations under frozen DP.
Figure 3: High-frequency reflex and force tracking: (a) UniReflex maintains success on contact-rich tasks under disturbances. (b) Effective force during the peel task for baselines vs. UniReflex. (c) Measured contact force vs. predicted reference force during UniReflex execution.
Perturbation
Policy
Metric
Peel
Wipe
Flip
Dynamic
DP
Rec.
10.0%
20.0%
10.0%
UniReflex (DP)
Rec./ Trec
90.0%/0.87s
100.0%/1.13s
80.0%/1.28s
TCP bias (1–2 cm)
UniReflex (DP)
Phase II Rec.
80.0%
90.0%
70.0%
Table 4: Recovery under two perturbation settings.
Backbone
Slow/Fast Params
Ratio
Steps K / Size H
Joint FT (ms)
Ours (ms)
Speedup
DP
452.3M / 1.70M
0.375%
20 (DDIM) / 256
≈ 406
7.70
≈ 53 ×
π0
3.50B / 6.60M
0.188%
10 (Flow-Matching) / 1,024
≈ 566
8.57
≈ 66 ×
DreamZero
22.92B / 62.2M
0.271%
8 (Flow-Matching) / 5,120
≈ 5,490
223
≈ 25 ×
Table 5: Backbone scale vs. reflex training cost . Joint FT: estimated full forward-backward cost; Ours: fast GRU backward step only.
Force-controlled robotic manipulation studies how robots regulate contact forces and compliance to grasp, assemble, and work safely with objects and surfaces.
During contact-rich manipulation, interactions between a robot and its environment carry information about local geometry: a surface prevents penetration, a bore guides a peg. A controller that exploits these interactions can comply with environmental constraints while preserving task intent. Robot-earning systems commonly use position, hybrid force-position, or Cartesian impedance control. Their prescribed tracking objectives, stiffness, or force-control directions may not match local constraints and may degrade performance. We learn a proprioceptive reflex policy in simulation on three simple interaction primitives: a spring, a plane, and a rail. The policy maps task-space commands to joint-position targets using state history, without direct force or geometrical measurements. Once trained, it serves as a frozen execution layer beneath higher-level controllers. We evaluate it in dual-arm box lifting, peg insertion, and surface following. In box lifting, the reflex kept the force below the threshold while the baseline failed. In rough-surface following it stayed below the 10 N reference, on par with tuned hybrid force-position control. In 0.02 mm peg insertion It reduced mean estimated contact force to less than half that of the baseline while increasing hardware success rates from at most 22 % to 36-58 %. By separating contact response from command generation, the reflex policy provides motion planners, learned policies, and teleoperators with robust contact-rich execution.
Contact-rich manipulation demands human-like integration of perception and force feedback: vision should guide task progress, while high-frequency interaction control must stabilize contact under uncertainty. Existing learning-based policies often entangle these roles in a monolithic network, trading off global generalization against stable local refinement, while control-centric approaches typically assume a known task structure or learn only controller parameters rather than the structure itself. In this paper, we formalize a physically grounded interaction frame, an instantaneous local basis that decouples force regulation from motion execution, and propose a method to recover it from demonstrations. Based on this, we address both issues by proposing Force Policy, a global-local vision-force policy in which a global policy guides free-space actions using vision, and upon contact, a high-frequency local policy with force feedback estimates the interaction frame and executes hybrid force-position control for stable interaction. Real-world experiments across diverse contact-rich tasks show consistent gains over strong baselines, with more robust contact establishment, more accurate force regulation, and reliable generalization to novel objects with varied geometries and physical properties, ultimately improving both contact stability and execution quality. Project page: https://force-policy.github.io/
Hongjie Fang, Shirun Tang, Mingyu Mei +9
Noematrix · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Zhejiang University +2
Diffusion policies have shown strong performance in learning complex, multi-modal behaviors for robotic manipulation. However, their application to contact-rich disassembly tasks remains limited by a key trade-off: the iterative denoising process introduces inference latencies that makes high frequency control difficult, which is essential for realizing dynamic interactions such as chiseling and prying. Recent action-chunking techniques mitigate latency but use an open-loop execution window, rendering the system blind to rapid force transients caused by fracture events. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Diffusion Policy Augmented by Fast Trajectory Generation (DPA-FTG). Compared to recent visual-tactile approaches that focus on positional correction, DPA-FTG decouples low-frequency planning from high-frequency force regulation. At the high level (5 Hz), a conditional diffusion model predicts a sequence of latent parameters for selecting a strategy from a learned vocabulary of task primitives. At the low level (60 Hz), a lightweight, force-conditioned policy acts as a neural impedance controller, modulating execution in real-time to maintain contact stability. We validate our approach on a bimanual battery disassembly task involving the separation of a compliant sheet. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that DPA-FTG outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, including Reactive Diffusion Policy (RDP).