Revisiting the "Push-T" Robot Manipulation Task with Agentic Robotics

How well can general-purpose multimodal models turn visual understanding and reasoning into embodied manipulation via executable code? We introduce CodeActionBench, a benchmark of 25 manipulation tasks that evaluates this capability through agentic Code-as-Policy. Without task-specific fine-tuning, demonstrations, external specialist perception or grasp modules, privileged scene state, or predefined task policies, agents should select visual evidence, form task-relevant 3D estimates, construct manipulation targets, and iteratively execute and revise their policies. A shared robot API provides RGB observations, calibrated geometric operations, robot feedback, and bounded motion, leaving task-dependent decisions to the evaluated agent. Fixed task instances, resource budgets, and a hidden physical-outcome verifier support controlled comparisons across models and harness configurations. Extensive evaluations across nine configurations and 675 attempts achieve success rates ranging from 2.7% to 73.3%. The strongest configuration, GPT-6 Astra with Codex CLI, solves 22 of 25 tasks at least once in three attempts, demonstrating the best performance while still leaving substantial room for improvement. Trajectory analyses reveal difficulties in spatial alignment, object retention, and completion judgment, including task failures despite successfully completed motions. CodeActionBench provides a controlled testbed for measuring how general-purpose models translate their capabilities into manipulation behavior and for examining typical failure scenarios in that process.

Coding agents can now write, run, and debug programs with little human help. Robot tasks, however, are usually specified by a sentence that leaves out how to grasp, in what order to make contact, and what the result should look like, and an agent given only the sentence must find these details by trial and error. We introduce ENCORE, which gives the agent a few demonstrations as evidence to read rather than as training data. A deterministic builder distills each demonstration into a pack of multi-view keyframes, gripper events, frame strips, and the full trajectory. A coding agent studies the pack, writes a policy program against a fixed perception and action API, refines it iteratively over a few development rollouts, and freezes it before a sealed evaluation that never reveals the success signal. On LIBERO-PRO, the agent's first program already succeeds in half of the perturbed tasks with demonstrations and in one task without them, and the frozen programs outperform the strongest prior agentic system run with the same language model (96.3% against 89.3%). On RoboDojo tasks whose instructions leave the goal unstated, no program succeeds without demonstrations. ENCORE also runs on a real bimanual robot, learning cube handover and cup inversion from five demonstrations each.

Can a multimodal language model learn to manipulate physical objects by reasoning about its own failures-without gradient updates, demonstrations, or reward engineering? We argue the answer is yes, under conditions we characterise precisely. We present Act-Observe-Rewrite (AOR), a framework in which an LLM agent improves a robot manipulation policy by synthesising entirely new executable Python controller code between trials, guided by visual observations and structured episode outcomes. Unlike prior work that grounds LLMs in pre-defined skill libraries or uses code generation for one-shot plan synthesis, AOR makes the full low-level motor control implementation the unit of LLM reasoning, enabling the agent to change not just what the robot does, but how it does it. The central claim is that interpretable code as the policy representation creates a qualitatively different kind of in-context learning from opaque neural policies: the agent can diagnose systematic failures and rewrite their causes. We validate this across three robosuite manipulation tasks and report promising results, with the agent achieving high success rates without demonstrations, reward engineering, or gradient updates.