HiTac-WAM: A Hierarchical Tactile World Action Model for Contact-Rich Robot Manipulation
Organizations: Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · ImprintX Robotics · Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
World action models jointly predict future visual observations and actions, whereas existing tactile-aware variants typically represent future touch as an image or latent stream without modeling the physical dependencies that organize tactile states hierarchically. We present HiTac-WAM, a hierarchical tactile world action model that forecasts a sequence of future tactile states for each candidate action chunk before execution. The forecast factorizes into contact state, a 3D deformation field, and slip risk, organized as a directed hierarchy in which each downstream stage is conditioned on stop-gradient signals from preceding stages. A directed attention mask allows tactile queries to attend to the video-action context of each candidate while preventing video and action queries from attending to tactile tokens. For planning, HiTac-WAM ranks candidate action chunks using tactile forecasts and task-progress estimates. For execution, the selected tactile forecast is retained as a reference; persistent discrepancies between predicted and observed tactile states trigger corrective replanning. HiTac-WAM achieves a mean contact F1 of 0.921; under matched training budgets, the directed hierarchy reduces 3D displacement L2 error by 17.6% relative to the deformation-only predictor and improves slip AUPRC by 60.4% relative to the slip-only predictor. Across chip grasping, blackboard erasing, and USB insertion, selection guided by the hierarchical forecasts increases the average real-robot success rate from 31.1% to 61.1%, while the full system attains 72.2%.
Figures & tables
| Method | Chip Grasping | Blackboard Erasing | USB Insertion | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DreamZero | 33.3 | 50.0 | 10.0 | 31.1 |
| Reactive Tactile | 40.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 |
| HiTac-WAM Selection | 70.0 | 73.3 | 40.0 | 61.1 |
| Full HiTac-WAM | 76.7 | 90.0 | 50.0 | 72.2 |
| Contact | 3D deformation | Slip risk | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task | Contact F1 | Onset MAE | Release MAE | 3D L2 (mm) | Top-20 Z MAE (mm) | Norm ratio | AUPRC |
| Chip grasping | |||||||
| Blackboard erasing | |||||||
| USB insertion | |||||||
| Mean | |||||||
| Model | F1 | 3D L2 | Top-20 Z | Norm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact-only | 0.903 | — | — | — |
| Deformation-only | — | 0.068 | 0.090 | 0.82 |
| Independent heads | 0.896 | 0.064 | 0.083 | 0.87 |
| Contact-conditioned | 0.915 | 0.059 | 0.076 | 0.94 |
| Directed hierarchy | 0.921 | 0.056 | 0.072 | 0.97 |
Tactile World Models
Tactile World Models predict how touch and contact change under robot actions to support planning and dexterous manipulation.
See all 30 papers