Scalable Distributed Simulation-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems

Scenario-Based Testing predominantly relies on the legacy ASAM OpenSCENARIO 1.x XML standard because existing continuous simulation frameworks lack native execution support for the recently matured v2.x Domain-Specific Language (DSL). Adapting legacy interpreters to evaluate v2.x logic introduces spatiotemporal drift, asynchronous event latencies, and artificial kinematic snapping. Addressing this execution gap, OSC2Runner introduces the first orchestration framework capable of natively mapping the OpenSCENARIO v2.x DSL to CARLA. The framework achieves this by formalizing scenario translation as a compilation pipeline through a multi-pass transpiler architecture. Bypassing static trajectory playback, the architecture synthesizes type-safe Abstract Syntax Trees directly into dynamic deterministic behavior trees (py_trees) natively mapped to CARLA's atomic APIs. Empirical validation in highly concurrent adversarial case studies demonstrates tick-by-tick determinism, exact spatial trigger evaluation, and 100.0 ms cross-actor blackboard synchronization. Kinematic analysis proves the strict adherence to continuous environmental boundaries. This architecture transitions Scenario-Based Testing from approximate behavioral interpretation to mathematically rigorous execution, establishing the deterministic backend required for co-simulation, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and automated LLM-driven generation pipelines.

Scenario-based testing with driving simulators is extensively used to identify failing conditions of automated driving assistance systems (ADAS). However, existing studies have shown that repeated test execution in the same as well as in distinct simulators can yield different outcomes, which can be attributed to sources of flakiness or different implementations of the physics. In this paper, we present MultiSim, a novel approach to multi-simulation ADAS testing based on a search-based testing approach that leverages an ensemble of simulators to identify failure-inducing, simulator-agnostic test scenarios. During the search, each scenario is evaluated jointly on multiple simulators. Scenarios that produce consistent results across simulators are prioritized for further exploration, while those that fail on only a subset of simulators are given less priority, as they may reflect simulator-specific issues rather than generalizable failures. Our empirical study, which involves testing three lane-keeping ADAS on different pairs of three widely used simulators, demonstrates that MultiSim outperforms single-simulator testing by achieving, on average, a higher rate of simulator-agnostic failures by 66%. Compared to a state-of-the-art multi-simulator approach that combines the outcome of independent test generation campaigns obtained in different simulators, MultiSim identifies, on average, up to 3.4X more simulator-agnostic failing tests and higher failure rates. To avoid the costly execution of test inputs on which simulators disagree, we propose to predict simulator disagreements and bypass test executions. Our results show that utilizing a surrogate model during the search retains the average number of valid failures and also improves efficiency. Our findings indicate that combining an ensemble of simulators is a promising approach for the automated cross-replication in ADAS testing.

Establishing trustworthy safety assurance for autonomous driving systems (ADSs) requires evidence that failures arise from avoidable system deficiencies rather than unavoidable traffic conflicts. Current adversarial simulation methods can efficiently expose collisions, but generally lack mechanisms to distinguish these fundamentally different failure modes. Here we present CARS (Context-Aware, Responsibility-attributed Scenario generation), a framework that integrates responsibility attribution directly into adversarial scenario generation. CARS combines context-aware adversary selection with a generative adversarial policy optimized in closed-loop simulation to construct collision scenarios that are both physically feasible and diagnostically attributable. Across benchmark datasets spanning heterogeneous national traffic environments, CARS consistently discovers feasible collision scenarios with high attribution rates under multiple regulation-prescribed careful and competent driver models. By coupling adversarial generation with normative responsibility assessment, CARS moves simulation testing beyond collision discovery toward the construction of interpretable, regulation-aligned safety evidence for scalable ADS validation.