WA-JEPA: Rethinking the Video JEPA Paradigm for World-Action Modeling in Autonomous Driving
Authors: Xinlin Wang, Yujiao Xiang, Yuheng Zhou, Jingqi Wang, Minqing Huang, Jiajie Huang, Dongxu Wei, Tingguang Zhou, Xiyang Wang, Gong Chen, Zhi Xu, Feiyang Tan, Hangning Zhou, Mu Yang
Organizations: Afari Intelligent Drive · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · Southeast University · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · Tianjin University
Video Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (V-JEPA) learns powerful spatiotemporal representations from video through self-supervised latent feature prediction. However, V-JEPA is built around random-mask completion and deterministic regression, making it fundamentally ill-suited for autonomous driving planning that demands future-directed prediction tightly coupled with action. To address this, we rethink the V-JEPA paradigm and present WA-JEPA, a V-JEPA-native world-action model designed for autonomous driving planning. Instead of random spatiotemporal masking, WA-JEPA employs hybrid future-masked pre-training, where the model infers future latents from observed context. Departing from deterministic regression, we recast future prediction as conditional flow matching over latent futures, which substantially improves the model's ability to generate plausible future latents for downstream planning. Finally, a joint future-action predictor is proposed to denoise future scene tokens and ego trajectories together in a unified spatiotemporal latent space, allowing action supervision to directly shape planning-relevant world representations. Pre-trained on nuPlan videos and fine-tuned on NAVSIM, WA-JEPA reaches 91.7 EPDMS on NAVSIM-v2, surpassing the strongest end-to-end and world-action baselines by 1.6 and 1.3 EPDMS, and, without HUGSIM-specific fine-tuning, attains the best HD-Score of 0.4462 on the closed-loop HUGSIM benchmark under the same evaluation protocol. These results validate V-JEPA-native world-action modeling as a powerful and scalable paradigm for autonomous driving planning. Code is available at https://github.com/AFARI-Research/WA-JEPA.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of V-JEPA, video-based world-action models, and our WA-JEPA. Our method bridges semantic representation learning and predictive world modeling through future-frame masking.
Figure 2: Overview of WA-JEPA. Stage 1 adapts V-JEPA 2 to multi-view driving videos by predicting future representations under full-future and patch-level masks. Stage 2 initializes from this checkpoint and jointly predicts future scene representations and ego actions with the Joint Future-Action Flow Predictor.
Method
Backbone
NC ↑
DAC ↑
DDC ↑
TLC ↑
EP ↑
TTC ↑
LK ↑
HC ↑
EC ↑
EPDMS ∗↑
EPDMS ↑
End-to-End Methods
TransFuser ( Chitta et al. 2022 )
RegNetY-3.2GF
96.9
89.9
97.8
99.7
87.1
95.4
92.7
98.3
87.2
76.7
–
ARTEMIS ( Feng et al. 2025 )
ResNet-34
98.3
95.1
98.6
99.8
81.5
97.4
96.5
98.3
–
83.1
–
Hydra-MDP++ ( Li et al. 2025b )
V2-99
98.8
97.8
99.1
100
84.0
95.3
70.1
–
96.8
84.1
–
DiffusionDrive ( Liao et al. 2025 )
ResNet-34
98.2
95.9
99.4
99.8
87.5
97.3
96.8
98.3
87.7
–
84.5
Drive-JEPA ( Wang et al. 2026a )
ResNet-34
98.8
97.4
99.0
99.8
83.5
98.0
96.2
98.1
85.6
85.4
–
Table 1: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on NAVSIM-v2 navtest . Methods are grouped by modeling paradigm. Backbone lists the primary visual or vision-language backbone used by each method. † marks results using auxiliary simulator-derived supervision. EPDMS ∗ refers to scores obtained before correction of the human-reference penalty-filter aggregation, whereas EPDMS reports the corrected scores.
WA-JEPA
LTF
DrivoR
UniAD
VAD
All 436 scenarios
NC
0.6856
0.4428
0.5217
0.6555
0.4117
DAC
0.9635
0.9275
0.9559
0.9320
0.9028
TTC
0.6120
0.3751
0.4620
0.5156
0.2798
Comf.
0.6620
0.9478
0.9390
0.6633
0.9534
PDMS
0.5717
0.3653
0.4475
0.4940
0.2831
Table 2: Zero-shot closed-loop results on HUGSIM. Values are on the [0,1] scale; higher is better, and the best result in each row is bold.
Figure 3: Target-referenced PCA visualization of future latent predictions from flow matching (FM) and direct regression (Reg.). For each method, a separate PCA basis is fitted to its EMA target representations and applied to both target and predicted latents. Each map represents two consecutive future frames.
Method
NC ↑
DAC ↑
TTC ↑
Comf. ↑
EP ↑
PDMS ↑
End-to-End Methods
TransFuser
97.7
92.8
92.8
100
79.2
84.0
DiffusionDrive
98.2
96.2
94.7
100
82.2
88.1
Drive-JEPA
98.7
96.2
95.5
100
82.9
89.0
VLA Methods
ReCogDrive
97.9
97.3
94.9
100
87.3
90.8
Table 3: Comparison on NAVSIM-v1 navtest .
Figure 4: Temporal representation preservation with flow matching (FM) and direct regression (Reg.). A lower directional-similarity collapse gap and a change-magnitude collapse closer to 1 indicate better preservation of the target temporal dynamics.
Encoder
EPDMS ↑
MAE
83.8
SigLIP2
83.1
DINOv3
83.8
V-JEPA 2
89.5
Table 4: Ablations on NAVSIM-v2 navtest . (a) Vision encoder selection. (b) Masking strategy in Stage 1. The first row represents the baseline that skips Stage 1 pre-training and directly uses the original pre-trained V-JEPA 2 for Stage 2 training. (c) Joint future–action predictor and future-prediction methods in Stage 2. FM and Reg. denote flow matching and direct regression, respectively. The first row denotes an action-only Stage 2 baseline initialized from the Stage 1 checkpoint and fine-tuned with aciton supervision, without joint scene-action modeling or future prediction.
Figure 5: Zero-shot closed-loop rollouts of WA-JEPA on HUGSIM. Rows correspond to the four source datasets and columns to three scenario types. Each pair shows the front camera with the projected 4 s plan (left) and the BEV view with the planned trajectory and detected objects (right). The green region marks the drivable corridor, the yellow–red curve the planned trajectory, the green box the ego vehicle, and orange boxes other agents.
Figure 6: Trajectory predictions on representative NAVSIM scenarios: (a) left and right turns, (b) fork and gateway navigation, and (c) stopping and straight driving.
Statistic
EPDMS
Number of seeds
10
Mean
91.7014
Standard deviation
0.0531
Standard error
0.0168
95% t -confidence interval
[91.6634,91.7393]
Median
91.6960
Table 7: Seed-level EPDMS variability for the main WA-JEPA experiment over a fixed set of ten seeds.
Existing autonomous-driving world models typically perform dense prediction of future videos, occupancy states, BEV representations, or agent motion. We argue that planning need not reconstruct the complete future world, but only focus on scene features that affect future ego action. Based on this perspective, we propose Auto-JEPA, an action-oriented latent world model that learns continuous future driving intent through joint-embedding prediction. Given visual observations, egomotion history, and navigation commands, Auto-JEPA predicts an intent embedding aligned with the latent representation of the future ego trajectory. The predicted intent retrieves executable trajectories from a fixed trajectory memory, which are then ranked by a scene-conditioned candidate selection module. Auto-JEPA keeps the visual encoder frozen, requires no explicit perception annotations, and uses no learned trajectory generator. By optimizing only task-specific modules for trajectory representation, intent prediction, and candidate selection, Auto-JEPA achieves 91.3 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 and 89.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2. Semantic occlusion experiments show that masking dynamic-agent regions induces an average intent change 2.97x that of equal-area random masking. Moreover, occluding vehicles that affect future driving substantially changes the predicted intent and selected trajectory, whereas both remain essentially unchanged when non-influential vehicles are occluded. These results show that future-intent prediction encourages the model to focus on planning-relevant visual features and supports high-quality planning without dense future-world modeling.
Jiwei Yang, Zhengxian Chen, Chaosheng Huang +1
School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University · 2State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University
Generalization is a central challenge in autonomous driving, as real-world deployment requires robust performance under unseen scenarios, sensor domains, and environmental conditions. Recent world-model-based planning methods have shown strong capabilities in scene understanding and multi-modal future prediction, yet their generalization across datasets and sensor configurations remains limited. In addition, their loosely coupled planning paradigm often leads to poor video-trajectory consistency during visual imagination. To overcome these limitations, we propose DriveVA, a novel autonomous driving world model that jointly decodes future visual forecasts and action sequences in a shared latent generative process. DriveVA inherits rich priors on motion dynamics and physical plausibility from well-pretrained large-scale video generation models to capture continuous spatiotemporal evolution and causal interaction patterns. To this end, DriveVA employs a DiT-based decoder to jointly predict future action sequences (trajectories) and videos, enabling tighter alignment between planning and scene evolution. We also introduce a video continuation strategy to strengthen long-duration rollout consistency. DriveVA achieves an impressive PDM-based planning performance of 90.9 PDM score on the NAVSIM benchmark. Extensive experiments also demonstrate the zero-shot capability and cross-domain generalization of DriveVA, which reduces average L2 error and collision rate by 78.9% and 83.3% on nuScenes and 52.5% and 52.4% on the Bench2Drive built on CARLA v2 compared with the state-of-the-art world-model-based planner.
Mengmeng Liu, Diankun Zhang, Jiuming Liu +7
University of Twente, The Netherlands · Xiaomi EV, China · University of Cambridge, United Kingdom +1
End-to-end autonomous driving increasingly leverages self-supervised video pretraining to learn transferable planning representations. However, pretraining video world models for scene understanding has so far brought only limited improvements. This limitation is compounded by the inherent ambiguity of driving: each scene typically provides only a single human trajectory, making it difficult to learn multimodal behaviors. In this work, we propose Drive-JEPA, a framework that integrates Video Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (V-JEPA) with multimodal trajectory distillation for end-to-end driving. First, we adapt V-JEPA for end-to-end driving, pretraining a ViT encoder on large-scale driving videos to produce predictive representations aligned with trajectory planning. Second, we introduce a proposal-centric planner that distills diverse simulator-generated trajectories alongside human trajectories, with a momentum-aware selection mechanism to promote stable and safe behavior. When evaluated on NAVSIM, the V-JEPA representation combined with a simple transformer-based decoder outperforms prior methods by 3 PDMS in the perception-free setting. The complete Drive-JEPA framework achieves 93.3 PDMS on v1 and 87.8 EPDMS on v2, setting a new state-of-the-art.
Linhan Wang, Zichong Yang, Chen Bai +6
Virginia Tech · Purdue University · XPENG Motors +1